Just as this article said, and my comment above, to solve the divide, we can: (1)
Argue about the definition of Race / God (2) Argue about identification in a religion / race (3) Or realize the fundamental problem of prejudice that sneaks into human - made abstractions like «race» and «God».
If we can even
argue about the definition of theology, it's no wonder that theology itself become one big argument.
The leaders of Judaism had dozens if not hundreds of definitions about what was» work «on the Sabbath Day and completely missed the point (Jesus said so) and here we are
arguing about the definition of «drawing ``.
We who
argue about the definition of torture in rendition and combat situations when we have officially renounced the use of violence, should appreciate the irony.
The extensive «comments» on the first answer show the OP
arguing about the definition as well.
«GMO is very controversial because people
argue about the definition,» Cuomo said.
Congress is
arguing about the definition of «journalist»; startups are experimenting with new business models and ways to deliver news to a mobile audience; people all over the world who don't call themselves journalists are using social media and smartphones to record, broadcast, and comment on «news.»
Not exact matches
We can
argue all day
about the
definition of «athlete,» so here's one way to look at it.
Both Calvinists and Arminians agree on the
definitions of these words, and then
argue about how they all fit together.
It is easy enough to be one of many sorts of conservative rather than
argue about the singular
definition of conservatism, or help a unified conservative movement to victory via some scintillating white paper.
While atheism has become a generic term with varying
definitions, I would
argue that the typical atheist simply rejects claims made by men
about gods / goddesses.
Historians will
argue endlessly, but not fruitlessly,
about definitions of the term, but their colleagues and the public will not wait for a neat
definition.
Instead of
arguing with people
about whether or not they are conscious of grammatical rules or when these rules are violated, wagering means that we can study consciousness without having an agreed - on formal
definition of consciousness.
You might
argue that this lack of
definition is
about the culture of 2015.
Whether engaged in an extensive conversation with his wife involving the
definition of «resisting evil» or
arguing with her
about the best way to spend their money, «Winter Sleep» takes its time establishing Aydin's troubled, self - involved subjectivity.
People have spent more than two millennia
arguing about the nature of Chinese philosophies, and likely will continue to do so - so any
definition we offer will inevitably fall short but, boiling things down, according to differencebetween.info, the key difference is that Taoism focuses on the relationship between man and nature, and Confucianism focuses on the relationship between man and society.
I must say, we are off and running in this installment, although part of the reason why I can say that is my
definition of «running» includes «
arguing about Taco Bell's Waffle Taco within a minute of starting the podcast.»
We could probably
argue about semantics such as what really is the correct
definition for the word «concensus».
Why would the populist sites like RC spend so much time
arguing about the non-existing thing and trying to put «quick
definitions» for it?
You keep
arguing about circularity, when the criticisms do not depend on whether your method meets your plausible
definition of circularity, as it relates to your peculiar suspect method.
Arguing about what we «believe» is, by
definition, pointless.
They
argued that for purposes of amendment, this
definition should be limited to information used to make medical or treatment decisions
about the individual.
Throughout the year, Russia objected to the creation of a Group of Governmental Experts, raising «major doubts»
about the need to do so now and
arguing that it was «premature» when there is not yet an agreed - upon
definition of lethal autonomous weapons systems.
Bezos»
definition, I'd
argue, could entail catty remarks
about your appearance and that's clearly not what we're talking
about here.