Few would
argue against The Tree of Life being one of the very best films of the year, but it remains the biggest wild card of awards season, a massively beloved masterpiece whose impressionistic style and ostensible inaccessibility have presumably prevented it from surging forward as a sure thing.
Not exact matches
Some
argue that humanity did have a free will before Adam and Eve rebelled
against God and fell into sin by eating fruit from the
Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Few
argue against «artificial
trees» that could suck CO2 directly from the atmosphere (see «Artificial
trees on the way» in the box below).
Faria et al show that samples from microcephaly cases are distributed around the evolutionary
tree, which strongly
argues against (although again can't absolutely disprove) this idea.
e.g. the Human eye,
trees, Human body etc. and resources on Natural disasters, plate tectonics etc. that can be used to
argue against the design argument.
Sure,
tree huggers can
argue against pickups since most people don't use them for towing or hauling, but dadgummit, the Silverado is insanely practical.
Well, I'm not going to
argue against the use of a
tree for Christmas.