That's not to
argue against choice, it's just to argue that we do it in a thoughtful way.»
Not exact matches
Collins, a moderate who voted
against the GOP's efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare earlier this year, says the bills will offset the impact of the loss of the individual mandate, but experts largely disagree,
arguing that the elimination of the mandate will spike health costs and reduce
choice in plans.
He
argued that a Christian facing problems at work with religious expression needed to consider their position and that they were not discriminated
against if they still had «the
choice of leaving their job and finding new employment».
Whilst it is hard to
argue against increased consumer
choice, the current situation is hardly satisfactory.
She hasn't been licensed in years, and spends so much time
arguing against women having birth
choices that it's highly doubtful she's kept up with current meaningful research.
Elsewhere, we have strongly
argued against «the bullet» option but, if truth be told, circumstances are giving us no
choice but a one - way
choice to reconsider our earlier position and then following that, to shift the goalposts accordingly.
Star Trek: Nemesis pits man
against himself in a battle of shared genetics and lifetime experiences
arguing that the aspiration to be a better person may be a human quality, but acting on that potential is an individual
choice.
Outspoken about her own experiences and pulling from 25 years writing about the industry, Joan Kron
argues against secrecy and looks at how female comedians have approached the issue - and their
choices - publicly with humor.
Last August, the American Civil Liberties Union won the latest in a series of lawsuits
against single - sex public schools in a district where, it
argued, children were given no other
choice.
Osborne takes a theory of decentralization, autonomy, accountability, and
choice, tests that theory
against real experience, and marshals substantial data to
argue that the new systemic approach is succeeding.
They depict me as
arguing against any regulation when my post was explicitly
against «high - regulation» of school
choice.
In a series of blog posts (I, II, III, IV), Jay Greene
argues against the «high - regulation approach» to school
choice.
Groups clashed over Shakespeare's intentions and word
choice; they
argued for and
against each other's interpretations.
-LSB-...] a series of blog posts (I, II, III, IV), Jay Greene
argues against the «high - regulation approach» to school
choice.
In
arguing against regulation, Jay writes: «But real education reform requires using the power of
choice and competition to provide incentives to create more good and to reduce bad.»
In «Expand
Choice, but Keep the Public Interest in Mind,» Nelson Smith
argues against Education Savings Accounts.
They summarize arguments
against students with disabilities participating in school
choice programs and offer counterarguments and nuances, ultimately
arguing that well - designed school
choice programs are beneficial to students with disabilities.
Even though taking out a personal loan to undergo debt consolidation is a very smart and straightforward
choice, many people warn
against it,
arguing that it only creates more problems and debt.
It is hard to
argue against a strategy that produces a better return than most investment
choices.
Plaintiffs
argue the sheer volume of three hundred total investment
choices for retirement investors indicates that defendants failed properly to monitor and evaluate the historical performance and expense of each of these funds, compare that historical performance and expense to a peer group of funds and / or even compare the three segments
against one another.
Well it isn't all good, and although pundits
argue that 401k loans are a good alternative to commercial loans and definitely a better
choice than an outright distribution, a 401k loan goes
against the whole principle of retirement investing.
But the dozen people who spoke
against the bill, including Petland owners and workers, Retail Association of Nevada members and dog breeders from Missouri,
argued the bill is too far reaching and will deprive the freedom of
choice for potential buyers.
Up to now scientists have however had little
choice but to engage in time - consuming op - ed exchanges, which result in one or two high - profile scientists
arguing against the views of an individual who may have no commitment to scientific accuracy at all.
No, what I'm seeing is your «Self - interest
argues against many
choices that science has led us to recognize as wise».
The Guardian: «Given that sea level has risen faster than predicted, if you're
arguing against the dangers posed by global warming, sea level is a poor
choice.»
Arguing against the probabilistic causation that exists at the quantum level — and thus evidently for causal necessity, but then also arguing for volition — in which free choice is the is the ability to choose between two potential courses of action in which either may be equally actual
Arguing against the probabilistic causation that exists at the quantum level — and thus evidently for causal necessity, but then also
arguing for volition — in which free choice is the is the ability to choose between two potential courses of action in which either may be equally actual
arguing for volition — in which free
choice is the is the ability to choose between two potential courses of action in which either may be equally actualizable.
It would be hard to know if this were because Monckton actually won or because of the
choice of Graeme Redfearn and Professor Brook to
argue against him.
Italy brought an action for annulment
against the publication of the two notices,
arguing that the notices should have been published in all official languages in the first place and that the
choice of the obligatory second language was discriminatory and not founded on objective reasons.
Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR), Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri (PPKM), and the Missouri Religious Coalition for Reproductive
Choice (MO - RCRC)
argued before the Missouri Supreme Court
against the Teen Health Endangerment law in November 2006.
Haynes also
argues vigorously
against asking grandchildren to express a
choice regarding grandparent visitation.