Not exact matches
Earlier this month, NBCC's outspoken president, attorney Fran Visco, sounded off
against approving the
drug Avastin for breast cancer,
arguing that «it does not show clinical benefit.»
Judge Carlos Lucero, in a partial dissent,
argued against such immunity: «The notion that a device manufacturer is immune from liability for harm caused by its device when the manufacturer has pushed the device for a use that the [U.S. Food and
Drug Administration] never approved is neither logical nor consistent with the Supreme Court's prior rulings about the scope of preemption of claims arising from harm caused by medical devices.»
AIDS activists
argued that the committee should recommend
against approving ddC for either use; they hoped to force Hoffmann - La Roche to conduct more studies to clarify how the
drug can best be used.
September 20, 2011 Food and
drugs: Administer together A regulatory bias
against taking oral anti-cancer medications with food places many patients at increased risk for an overdose and forces them to «flush costly medicines down the toilet,»
argues Mark Ratain, MD, an authority on cancer -
drug dosing.
Arthritis: Allergy, Nutrition & The Environment by Dr. John Mansfield and Dr. Stephen Davies
argues against suppressing arthritic symptoms with
drugs, and outlines exactly what action sufferers of arthritis can take in terms of nutrition and identifying allergens to tackle the cause of the illness.
Rose McGowan's lawyers have filed a motion to dismiss a
drug - possession charge
against her by
arguing that cocaine was planted in her belongings, perhaps by «the Harvey Weinstein machine.»
Some health experts see the current regulatory hiatus on e-cigarettes as no bad thing: They
argue that, e-cigarettes are a vital quitting aid for existing smokers; that they are relatively «harmless» when set
against conventional cigarettes, due to the absence of tar; and that nicotine, per se, while highly addictive, is a relatively benign
drug.
In Hollywood, the rehab facility
argued that that sentence precluded plaintiff from bringing his negligence claim
against it as it was not the supplier of the
drugs that caused his injury.