Sentences with phrase «argue against evolution»

That your statements are basically identical to the sorts of statements made by those who argue against evolution is not a coincidence.

Some creationists do use thermodynamics to argue against evolution, but that is not what I am doing here; as an expert on evolutionary processes I would never do that.

@Truth, are you aware that the information you're presenting doesn't actually argue against evolution, only against one version of the details?

Watching people argue against evolution is perplexing.

People who argue against evolution rarely understand exactly what it is.

The same can be said for creationists arguing against evolution.

John Richardson Agreed, I am not arguing against evolution simply saying it does not change or impact the Bible story of creation.

The finding that sexual isolation may be brought about by changes in at most a few genes argues against the evolution of new species in this manner by long - term runaway processes, as dictated by evolutionary dogma, Coyne said.

with respect you can not win arguing against evolution.

Not exact matches

I think my question to those of you who couple atheism with evolution and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

I think my question to those of you who couple evil atheism with evolution, the big bang, and climate change is: how can we as scientists even start trying to inform you about the details of what you are arguing against if you automatically presume everything we say is a blasphemous lie?

It is completely made up by creationist because they can't argue against micro evolution because it is continually happening right in front of them.

I know several scientists and they have a hard time arguing against any of the findings because evolution is not observable as Mr. Nye claims.

Evolution does not predict what you claim and betrays you simply don't understand what you are arguing against.

Na, it's just an invented word used in contrast with small - scale evolution, micro-evolution, that we can see in the field and therefore can not be argued against.

Chad, do yourself the disfavor of continuing to argue the stupidity that you do that does more harm to your position and the position of creationists than it does to the theory of evolution that you claim to be against.

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»

Alongside his 50 years of research into evolution, Professor Ayala has long been a champion of the interdisciplinary questions of faith and science, arguing repeatedly against both creationist / intelligent design and atheist approaches to the origins of life.

Same goes for evolution... read and understand an evolutionary biology textbook before arguing against it.

Darwin was only half - right about evolution: evidence against natural selection is mounting up, argue Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli - Palmarini

I also argued against the probability of an initial small, well - defined vocabulary in the evolution of language and in favor of an emergent vocabulary that never became precisely defined.

Its roots can be traced back a century to three - time Democratic candidate for president William Jennings Bryan, who ran fundamentalist campaigns against the theory of evolution, which he argued was causing moral decay in the nation's youth by undermining the authority of the Bible.

The stake's on Donegal's books at 23.8 M, and last valued by the court at 26.2 M — considering more recent deals, I'd hope / expect Donegal can successfully argue for a significantly higher valuation multiple, but obviously that will also depend on the evolution of MMM's EBITDA... They should also argue against what seemed like debatable adjustments to MMM's EV previously.

While some argue that this goes against the cryptocurrency's original ideology as laid down in its whitepaper, others believe that it is a natural evolution for bitcoin.