Sentences with phrase «argue against his reasoning»

Not exact matches

They argued that the only reason women wanted to «mother» and keep house in the community was because they were so bad at such things at home - that municipal housekeeping was only a movement against domestic housekeeping.

Arguing against will be Patrice Lee, and director of outreach at Generation Opportunity, a limited - government activist and policy network for millennials, and Matt Welch, editor - in - chief of the libertarian magazine Reason.

There may be reasons arguing against including a spouse as a partner; for example, if you transfer title to your personal assets into your spouse's name to protect your personal property in the event the partnership is sued, the spouse can not have any involvement in the partnership business whatsoever, according to Ennico.

That's part of the reason US companies spent the past few weeks lobbying against the proposed tariffs, arguing that they'd raise costs for their businesses and make Chinese - made goods, like iPhones, more expensive for US customers.

Still, the most compelling reason to argue against expensive weddings is that while many things needed for a memorable wedding cost money, the most important ones — a kiss at the altar, a mother's tear as she sees her son make a lifelong commitment — are free.

The claim of privileged access is not saved by arguing that each of us intuitively grasps this self without analysis or argument, that each of us singly grasps the essence of experience in this intuition, and that the analysis or argument is required only (1) to call it to the attention of those who have not noticed it, or (2) to defend the claim of such an intuition against those who deny it for no or bad reasons, or (3) to develop its implications and describe its content.

For this reason there is a strong tendency for feminists to argue against any state - imposed restrictions.

Just out of curiosity, back when you were «one of the champions in the church proudly speaking out against the threat of the homosexual offenders» what were the reasons you used to argue for that position?

For this reason, opponents of anticipated features of the two international trade agreements, argued strongly against «fast track.»

My old friend Peter J. Leithart joins Tony Montanaro, Gary Inbinder, and Kelley Vincent to argue» each for different reasons» against my worries about the implicit claims of authority made when modern democratic states employ the death penalty.

One reason for the suspicion against which I am arguing is that I have made no secret of the great influence on me of Whitehead's philosophy.

People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away at the inviolability of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated against should beware of hypocrisy; they are often the same people who argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.»

They argued against the despotism of God as well as against determinism and fatalism and put their whole trust in human reason, which to them was sacred.

But even without religious beliefs, we'd still not all agree on things like that, so here's a more practical reason to argue against religion:

The very fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other about these questions.

Hence, while I believe that Griffin has every right to maintain that free - will theodicies are implausible and to encourage us to agree, I see no reason why I, or any other FWT, needs to admit (at least on the basis of anything that Griffin has argued) that FWTs can not defend themselves successfully against the claim that free - will theism «can not provide a plausible theodicy.»

While the book gives an interesting summary of various authors who have argued that it was the Protestant Reformation that gave rise to atheism, the author fails to note any connection between the rejection (traceable from nominalism) of reason's capacity to know reality, the Protestant Reformation's appeal to faith against reason, intellectual scepticism and current postmodernism.

Calvin not only argued against them on the basis of clear scripture, proper definitions and dialectical reasoning.

I am so tired of people who, when I comment or argue against their viewpoint, claim that my reasoning or born out of fear.

Chromosome 2 and its extra centromere and telomere regions argues against special creation for the same reason male nip - ples and our defunct egg yolk protein gene argues against special creation.

In fact, for the very reasons you suggest, Chromosome 2's fusion argues against the literal view of a genetically perfect Adam / Eve who only suffered mutation after the fall, that is, an overnight fixation of this fusion throughout the entire human population.

On this basis, technological reason can argue against continuing the rapid growth of population, pollution, industrial production, and use of natural resources.

I'm not aiming to spend much time arguing against complementarianism, but rather showing that egalitarianism is a tenable position for Christians, based on scripture, reason, tradition, etc..

Catholic citizens have every reason — including the truth of the matter — to argue that our Constitution is much more democratic that our Court now says it is, just as they have every reason to argue that our Framers never meant «liberty» to be used as a wrecking ball deployed against our indispensable relational «intermediary» institutions — beginning with the family and the church.

Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually read my responses.

I'm not arguing against that, just stating a reason that deep runs into the tournament are exceptions and not the rule.

Perhaps it is more and more on here seeing no reason to argue against this sentiment and are finding it harder to defend some of his actions / in - action?

Like I said its time to stop the in house arguing, of which I am also guilty of, and collectively get behind the team and manager, this can be used as a major reason to kick on now, an «us against everyone» mentality could be just the tonic to see us make a fight for trophies.

The gooner fans who argue blindly against any discussion that is skeptical of yesterdays result, do so not from the perspective of objective reasoning, they do so because to speak a negative word against Arsenal is tantamount to insulting their mother.

The toon fans who argue blindly against any discussion that is skeptical of yesterdays result, do so not from the perspective of objective reasoning, they do so because to speak a negative word against Newcastle is tantamount to insulting their mother.

The news piece made up a construct of inane syntaxes coupled with dismal play of words made a bold prediction arguing the reasons as to why Stoke City would triumph against Crystal Palace.

Another reason to argue against images is that not everyone has images enabled.

Admittedly, this point is not beyond dispute: most notably, Adam Tomkins has argued against this view, contending that the Scottish Parliament lacks this power, but, for reasons I have set out on this blog, I think it unlikely he is correct on this point.

While there are many social, political, and economical reasons to argue against the order, what part of the Constitution are these sources referring to?

While it's hard to argue against anything you wrote (i agree with most points), specific examples - especially of people citing those specific individual reasons - would improve this answer a lot.

The reason to argue against the present state of tuition fees is not necessarily the cost to the Treasury of a generous repayment threshold or even levels of graduate non-repayment.

At times they have argued, against all reason, that Britain's economic malaise is down to overblown government, as opposed to the ravages of the market.

Political scientists have argued that the major reason driving the public to vote against the proposal was their unfamiliarity with the new system.

Dr. David Berger at Broome Hospital in Western Australia, argues that the only reason to suppress doctors in this way, «is to avoid embarrassing revelations about how Australia is flouting its international humanitarian obligations towards refugees and is subjecting them to treatment that violates the United Nations Convention Against Torture.»

Mathias, one of the reasons I particularly hate movies like this is that they force me to sound like I'm arguing against something I actually agree with.

Or maybe that he must help Jimmy, precisely because all logic and reason argue against it.

For example, you may argue against death penalty and provide reasons why you think it should be abolished.

For this reason I say to the fools who argue against the S&P downgrade of the US, «How do you know?»

An immediate annuity's ability to transfer money from people who die early to those who die late is largely the reason that a recent study by former U.S. Treasury official Mark Warshawsky concluded that while an annuity didn't always provide more retirement income than using the 4 % rule or other type of systematic withdrawal, it did so often enough that «it is hard to argue against a significant and widespread role for immediate life annuities in the production of retirement income.»

I'm not arguing against his thesis (although I don't believe it is correct) but his reasoning is suspect.

Not a myth, but a common reason among owners arguing against corn for dogs is that canines are carnivores and there's no reason to feed them grains like corn.

It comes with the territory of arguing against normally well - reasoned Conventional Wisdom.

It comes with the territory of arguing against normally well - reasoned Conventional Wisdom.But occasionally I hit... [Read more...] about Targeting Conventional Wisdom in 2015 (and 3 Predictions for 2016)

Arguing against the notion that history is made by the will and reason of great individuals, Kenny Hunter takes a familiar genre — the historical bust — and turns it inside out.

I actually watched a state legislator get up on the floor recently and argue against a global warming bill for that reason.