Dawkins, in his mediocre opinions in The God Delusion: -[1] Fails to support debunked assertions [i.e.can't defend his opinions when they are
argued against by real scientists and Theologians!]
Whitney gave false testimony to try to
argue against it by saying that children of gay couples are routinely abused, when statistics show otherwise.
Already
argued against by numerous philosophers and put to rest a long time ago.
Opponents of the death penalty
argue against it by citing America (where the system is misapplied, inconsistent and often takes decades before punishment is implemented), or by playing a neat conjuring trick with the UK figures.
For Ed Miliband, tentative early attempts to shift Labour's position on spending were
argued against by Ballsites in shadow cabinet.
People
argue against it by saying, «Hey, you know the carbon footprint of flying food thousands of miles is ridiculous so we should grow [things] locally» but the counter argument is, but if you can grow so much wheat sufficiently in Kansas even including the transportation for thousands of miles it's still more efficient in terms of resources.
This idea was effectively
argued against by John Norstad.
Now I have been trying to
argue against this by saying that eventually prices will be so high that interest rates on the mortgage alone can't be keept down, but somehow I always fail at convincing them.
Not exact matches
Moscow has tried to legitimize this course of action
by arguing that the Taliban is helping in the fight
against ISIS.
The billionaire
argues that «it's precisely because I respect journalists that I do not believe they are endangered
by fighting back
against Gawker.»
Kimmel has since actively railed
against Obamacare repeal efforts,
arguing that various proposals being debated
by the law's opponents would gut protections for people like Billy born with pre-existing conditions, either
by rolling back Obamacare's mandated insurance benefits for certain health conditions or allowing states to set up rules that would let insurers charge sick people more for their coverage.
As the DOJ's complaint
against the merger
argues, the resulting conglomerate might «use its control of Time Warner's popular programming as a weapon to harm competition»
by raising the prices it charges other cable networks for Time Warner entertainment or limiting distribution of content from other producers.
Numerous other examples of Google influencing academics are highlighted
by the Journal's report, including one from University of Michigan law professor Daniel Crane who declined to take money from Google to support his paper that
argued against «antitrust regulation of internet search engines.»
The Paypal cofounder and Facebook board member also
argued his bankrolling of a lawsuit brought
by pro-wrestler Terry «Hulk Hogan» Bollea
against media conglomerate Gawker, which ultimately drove the company into bankruptcy, was not a threat to freedom of the press.
Exxon has
argued against all the other shareholder proposals as well, including a «policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity»; a policy articulating Exxon's «respect for and commitment to the human right to water»; «a report discussing possible long term risks to the company's finances and operations posed
by the environmental, social and economic challenges associated with the oil sands»; a report of «known and potential environmental impacts» and «policy options» to address the impacts of the company's «fracturing operations»; a report of recommendations on how Exxon can become an «environmentally sustainable energy company»; and adoption of «quantitative goals... for reducing total greenhouse gas emissions.»
By contrast, LGBTQ advocates argue that violence and bias against transgender people is a very real problem exacerbated by prejudicial law
By contrast, LGBTQ advocates
argue that violence and bias
against transgender people is a very real problem exacerbated
by prejudicial law
by prejudicial laws.
Still, Khodorkovsky is urging people to «get off the couch» and vote next month,
arguing against a boycott like that suggested
by Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.
Genworth's Vukanovich
argues against shaking up the status quo
by altering mandatory mortgage insurance.
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters)- A lawsuit filed
by drivers
against ride service Uber should not proceed as a class action, the company
argued in a court filing on Thursday, citing written statements of support from hundreds of other Uber drivers in a case that could decide whether they are independent contractors or employees.
He used the term «tar sands,» one the advocates of Canada's bitumen sector have long
argued is,
by itself, biased
against the «oil sands.»
This brought to mind a podcast I heard recently where the guy was
arguing against having an emergency fund (in a typical cash - based vehicle as espoused
by most).
The Department of Justice defended the rule when it filed papers in July in a Washington district court
arguing against the case filed
by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.
Industry trade groups like the Investment Company Institute and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association have come out
against state - run plans,
arguing that they will spur a «confusing, state -
by - state patchwork of savings programs» that could lack strict federal controls.
«Rep. Young suggests guns could've saved Jews during Holocaust,» from Alaska Public Media: «Speaking at a conference in Juneau last week, Alaska Congressman Don Young [R]
argued against gun control
by suggesting Jews might not have died in the Holocaust if they had been armed.
Originally posted
by the Financial Post By Anita Anand, Alexander Dyck, Cristie Ford, Richard Leblanc, Randall Morck and Stéphane Rousseau The Financial Post has offered various pieces of commentary that argue against Bill C - 25 introduced by the federal governmen
by the Financial Post
By Anita Anand, Alexander Dyck, Cristie Ford, Richard Leblanc, Randall Morck and Stéphane Rousseau The Financial Post has offered various pieces of commentary that argue against Bill C - 25 introduced by the federal governmen
By Anita Anand, Alexander Dyck, Cristie Ford, Richard Leblanc, Randall Morck and Stéphane Rousseau The Financial Post has offered various pieces of commentary that
argue against Bill C - 25 introduced
by the federal governmen
by the federal government.
If anything, some U.S. analysts have
argued that the November 4 midterms represented more a vote
against Washington gridlock than the endorsement of the political agenda advocated
by the Republicans.
$ 40,000 extra for six weeks worth of testifying and strategy is good work if you can get it, but perhaps SQN could have found someone who didn't previously publicly
argue against trade action in the anti-dumping and countervailing duty petition filed in 2014
by SolarWorld.
Libertarian populism seeks to reverse that impression
by arguing that higher taxes, greater regulation, and big government generally work on behalf of the politically connected and
against the average person.
In court their lawyer Moshkani Farahani, who had previously
argued against the charges faced
by each of his clients at the last court session of this trial on 24 November, said they should be released.
Sidhak's father, Sagardeep Singh Arora
argued that the school discriminated
against his son,
by not allowing him to wear the patka or have uncut hair - essential parts of his religion.
If 90 % of the country believed in the tooth fairy and thought we should all live
by laws originating in the tooth fairy and run our country according to the tooth fairy's wisdom, you'd probably be on blogs dealing with the tooth fairy and
arguing against the use of her existence as a basis for running society.
Here is a remarkably poorly
argued and tendentious (not to say profoundly misleading) column
by Marci Hamilton, making the case
against religious hiring rights.
Or even when the Church
argues against contraceptive use
by Catholics, as that is effectively
arguing for overpopulation.
You raise a very good point that escapes most theists and that is while they
argue against atheists for not believing in their god, they forget that most of those arguments could be applied to them
by somebody of another religion.
Yes, Hindu thinkers such as the first Hindu missionary to America Swami Vivekananda have
argued against caste, and the Indian Constitution outlawed caste - based discrimination, but the caste system, both ancient and religious, will not be swatted away so easily
by either reformers or legislators.
Catharine Beecher, sister of Harriet Beecher Stowe and Henry Ward Beecher,
argued against women's suffrage on the grounds that «women could influence public affairs very satisfactorily without recourse to the ballot box,
by the simple expedient of influencing the opinions and outlook of those who did have the vote — their husbands and sons» (Reay Tannahill, Sex in History, [Stein & Day], 1980, p. 389).
The claim of privileged access is not saved
by arguing that each of us intuitively grasps this self without analysis or argument, that each of us singly grasps the essence of experience in this intuition, and that the analysis or argument is required only (1) to call it to the attention of those who have not noticed it, or (2) to defend the claim of such an intuition
against those who deny it for no or bad reasons, or (3) to develop its implications and describe its content.
Most significantly, Duddington
argues against the charge that permitting an increasing role for religion in the legal and political (i.e., public) spheres would necessitate the imposition of one system of belief upon another,
by re-emphasising the argument that Christianity does not serve to generate a moral code, but rather provides a vehicle through which it may be discovered.
Nicolaus Zinzendorf once
argued for the mission and
against ambition
by saying, «Preach the gospel, die, and be forgotten.»
Both are weighty issues that deal explicitly with «high cosmic justice,» so if he
argues that a government overreaches its authority to execute justice
by attempting to «balance the books of the universe» in repaying blood with blood, then does that mean there can never be any just criteria for one nation to retaliate
against another after an unprovoked attack» an attack that in essence would repay blood with blood?
Part of the Ten Commandments, this passage has been used
by many social conservatives to
argue against Roe v. Wade and abortion rights.
Along the way, Mattes
argues strenuously
against all easy reductions of the doctrine: It is, he insists, the critical feature of Christian theology, and so it must not be compromised
by programs of ecumenism or ethics.
Maudoodi entered the lists
against the Muslim wing of the Indian National Congress
by writing a book on Muslims and the Present Political Struggle, in which he
argued so forcefully
against the stand taken
by the Muslim Congress that the Muslim Leaguers hoped he would come over to support the Pakistan movement.
This is clear when Cobb
argues against Sherburne that even the visual field would have to be organized
by the dominant occasion: «Probably we must be held to see different parts of the visual field successively, perhaps one color at a time» (PS 3:28).
The means
by which we produce such abundance are good: Who would
argue against making human toil easier
by means of machines?
There were objections made
against these «proofs» like the one made
by Kant who noted that one can not
argue from finite causes to the Infinite Cause, because from the finite all one gets is the finite.
For example, Moses Stuart of Andover Seminary in Massachusetts (who was sympathetic to the eventual emancipation of American slaves, but was
against abolition), published a tract in which he pointed to Ephesians 6 and other biblical texts to
argue that while slaves should be treated fairly
by their owners, abolitionists just didn't have Scripture on their side and «must give up the New Testament authority, or abandon the fiery course which they are pursuing.»
I wish someone had told that to the Reformers, some of whom were burned for translating the Bible into their native languages so people could read it, who
argued for salvation
by grace
against a salvation
by works Gospel, who
argued for Jesus as the son of God, uncreated, instead of just one among many of «God's» created beings.
Over
against all attempts to prove truth
by a literal quotation from Scripture or
by an appeal to an infallible leader, Bushnell
argued that the difficulty arises from language itself.
observer You continue to
argue against the attributes of God as recorded
by the Chosen Ones in the Old Testament.