Sentences with phrase «argue against such»

This includes both statements calling for action to cut greenhouse gas emissions as well as ones that argue against such action.

Everyone values biz differently but no one can really argue against such a small price premium.

We'd argue against such drastic measures.

And in a world that rapidly seems to be embracing a floor price of FREE it's hard to argue against such claims.

While we can not rule out the possibility that the similar male gametogenic requirement in mice and Drosophila is a coincidence and both evolved independently, the striking similarity in the reproductive defects of loss - of - function mutants of Drosophila and mouse Boule homologs (male specific infertility, global arrest of spermatogenesis, absence of elongating spermatids and mature sperm) argue against such a possibility.

He argues against all such theologies in that they attempt to set up a «glory road» to God, a way of self - reliance toward righteousness and holiness.

Madison's words were taken from a lengthy argument against a specific bill in Virginia's legislature which would have levied a tax in order to financially support the teaching of Christianity, and he argued against such a tax on the grounds that past legal support of Christianity had led to its corruption.»

I hope no one is arguing against such religious moral faith.

Some of his Republican colleagues, though, argued against such a ban.

«We fought the last general election arguing against such scapegoating, and celebrating the contributions of migrants to our society.

Judge Carlos Lucero, in a partial dissent, argued against such immunity: «The notion that a device manufacturer is immune from liability for harm caused by its device when the manufacturer has pushed the device for a use that the [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] never approved is neither logical nor consistent with the Supreme Court's prior rulings about the scope of preemption of claims arising from harm caused by medical devices.»

When: March 23rd Why: A lot of people have been quick to bill «The Hunger Games» as the next «Twilight,» and while it's easy to see why — not only is it based on a series of young adult novels, but it also features a very similar love triangle at its core — just about everyone involved with the movie has argued against such comparisons.

Ginsburg argues against such an adjustment, saying it «makes no sense» but, then, within the same paragraph, engages in an analysis similar to what I have recommended, saying, to wit: «For math... DC gains at grade 4 were higher than any state» over the full 2000 - 07 period.

When Amazon tried to squeeze you with Select, I argued against such monopolistic efforts far and wide.

I've always held that if a game can be singleplayer only, then it's perfectly acceptable to have a multiplayer only game as well, and that arguing against such a thing is a concept from a dead era.

The work on clouds only illustrates an underlying problem with GCMs which, so far, has proved intractible, and which argues against any such use.

Mind you, I'm not making simplistic cause and effect conclusions here — but arguing against such conclusions.

Following some Twitter discussion (must get Storify working properly for things like this) Chris Berg pointed to a piece he'd written arguing against such a use of secondary boycott legislation (and against such legislation in general).

Successfully arguing against such defenses typically requires a plaintiff to conduct a complete investigation in order to be ready with a compelling factual analysis of the case that explores all of the relevant factual and legal issues at hand.

Although it may have been appropriate to file with the Ministry of Labour in the Chevalier case, this blog has often argued against such an approach, see e.g..

At this point it's much harder to argue against buying Google's Pixel or Pixel XL than it is arguing against such a purchase.

In 2009, Moran argued against such «simplistic solutions».

Not exact matches

They argued that the only reason women wanted to «mother» and keep house in the community was because they were so bad at such things at home - that municipal housekeeping was only a movement against domestic housekeeping.

Morin, too, argues against any supposed cure - all for the Canadian retirement system, such as a major expansion of CPP with higher contribution and benefit levels.

I'd argue there are biases against such pressure among both the fiscal and monetary «authorities» — the Fed and the Congress.

Mr. Lighthizer, Mr. Navarro and other proponents of a harder line against China have argued that the Chinese tend to use such dialogues as a delaying tactic, and that past trade negotiations with them have not been productive.

But we argue that the underlying social purpose of such Jubilees — to keep debt within the reasonable ability to be paid without social and economic polarisation — could be recreated via alternative mechanisms, and we discuss the politico - economic arguments for, and against, doing so.

We have argued that the Japan experience is unique and that the U.S. has many characteristics (e.g., size, diversity, population growth, net immigration, natural resources) that militate against such an outcome.

It is such intellectual dishonest that is so pervasive among many believers I argue against.

Yes, Hindu thinkers such as the first Hindu missionary to America Swami Vivekananda have argued against caste, and the Indian Constitution outlawed caste - based discrimination, but the caste system, both ancient and religious, will not be swatted away so easily by either reformers or legislators.

The claim of privileged access is not saved by arguing that each of us intuitively grasps this self without analysis or argument, that each of us singly grasps the essence of experience in this intuition, and that the analysis or argument is required only (1) to call it to the attention of those who have not noticed it, or (2) to defend the claim of such an intuition against those who deny it for no or bad reasons, or (3) to develop its implications and describe its content.

The means by which we produce such abundance are good: Who would argue against making human toil easier by means of machines?

How can any Christian argue with much conviction against capital punishment if God effects his purpose in such an unwaveringly bloody way?

For what it is, we could produce millions of people who would argue that they prayed for X and got X or something even better when the odds were against such an outcome.

When the Nazi officials on trial at Nuremberg argued in their defense that they had merely obeyed the laws of the state, public opinion quickly agreed that there ought to be a law proscribing such crimes against humanity.

This is in part due to the influence of 20th - century theologians such as Paul Tillich, Rudolf Bultmann and Jürgen Moltmann who have argued persuasively against viewing eschatology in personal terms.

Childress argued that war is fundamentally morally problematic, as the killing in war goes against the prima facie duty of benevolence, which rules out killing or inflicting harm on other persons: «[B] ecause it is prima facie wrong to injure or kill others, such acts demand justification.»

Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.

They might argue even (against Paul) that doing such things sends people to hell, rather than seeing references to the «Kingdom of God» or «Kingdom of Heaven» as Jesus used them, as being about out lives here and now and what we might accomplish as we follow Christ (to which a «beneficial» conversation is much more fitting).

Since one of Whitehead's ablest interpreters has argued the impossibility of such relationships in the context of his thought, some of the argument will be directed implicitly against his objections.

When he developed the objectivist epistemology that encompassed the first part of Leviathan, when he argued, contrary to all the ancients, that nature «dissociates,» he did so, against the background of civil war, primarily to secure a rational foundation for politics so that such wars could be avoided in the future.

The influence of these older evolutionary cosmologies on Whitehead's thought, moreover, is never carefully examined so much as it is presupposed.1 Against such presuppositions, I shall argue here that evolution and evolutionist theories play no significant role in Whitehead's metaphysics, and that there is no evidence in his major works of any significant influence from earlier process - oriented «evolutionary cosmologies.»

Yet philosophers at least since Kant have argued with great force against just such a notion of pure receptivity and have asserted in a variety of ways that the subject is always an active participant in the process of knowing.

Habermas has argued specifically against trying to make such connections with concrete historical examples, suggesting that evolutionary theories are better viewed as normative guides toward the future than as testable theories.

It is against this background that our countryman, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, has rightly argued that the church has to be concerned about the secular things such as politics and economics, education, medical aid, the rent and housing, food prices et cetera.

This affirmation stands against a strand of the classical tradition that argues we must affirm death in order to fully embrace life, «that we can not see life clearly except through the lens of death, but that once we have seen it with such clarity, we can savor it.»

Rabbi Isaac Unterman adopted a «permissive stance» with regard to the conversion of spouses of Russian immigrants to Israel, arguing that if there is «danger that the Jewish members of such families may be lost to Judaism... regulations against accepting insincere converts may be suspended.»

Bruggeman argues that the prophet does not contend against such entities with arms and use of force, but with the much more powerful weapon of imagination and creativity.

Here is a Muslim woman who makes some sense, arguing for items of modesty such as burkini but against face veiling.

For example, if a method (such as rhythm) is ineffective and thus causes great personal anxiety, that factor argues against its use.