In
such a forum, balancing can play a key role and they
argue that the proper method for assessing the new counter-terrorism laws, from a human rights perspective, is to adopt a «balancing approach» according to which the importance of the relevant human right is weighed
against the importance of the societal or community interest in deciding whether to take legislative
action (or, from the position of a judge, in deciding whether a certain law is valid).
Drawing on case studies of past environmental debates
such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz
argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful
action on climate change lower - cost, then much of the argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus on climate change will depend heavily on advocates for
action calling attention to a diverse mix of options, with some
actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or
actions to protect cities and communities
against climate risks, more likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.