Sentences with phrase «argue against that decision»

One feels one should argue against that decision, but it is hard to know just how.

«We give patents for screwdriver blades with a new slope every day,» Goffney stated, noting, however, that he had personally argued against the decision to allow patents on ESTs.

However if you are a very active investor than selling seems to be a no brainer and it would be hard to argue against this decision as the price does appear to be meaningfully higher than anything in reality.

With $ 30M of revenue and counting for an investment of maximum two million, you can't really argue against this decision.

Not exact matches

Bloom is the author of Against Empathy: the Case for Rational Compassion, which argues that we too often let our emotions get in the way of making sound decisions.

The decision has the effect of the removing the fiduciary rule from the books, say attorneys who argued against the DOL rule.

He successfully argued against forum non conveniens dismissal, obtaining the first ruling after the Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010) to permit foreign investors pursuing foreign law claims to seek recovery for losses on a foreign stock exchange in a U.S. court.

The sort of thing I would have thought that no one would really want to argue against in this day and age, yet here you are, calling me a «fear - monger» and talking like I was against anyone using their life experiences to make decisions.

I well understood her decision and did not argue against it.

Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.

All I'm arguing is that this «meaning» would likely militate against the conclusion that GA221's decision was qualitatively «Reformed».

Everybody knows this, and men argue against its necessity and legitimacy only if certain decisions offend them morally and / or politically, as occurred for example in the attack on the Warren Court by the Conservative Right.

That decision has sparked a backlash from health advocates, who say current labelling does not do enough to highlight foods which should be avoided, while grocery manufacturers argue traffic - light labels are simplistic and too blunt an instrument in the fight against obesity.

But if his decision is more about WINNING MORE CHAMPIONSHIPS, it will be hard to argue against us.

It was a split second decision and what I'm arguing against is the knee jerk «he's the big bad man and she's the poor helpless female» reactions I'm seeing.

-- THEN VERMONT SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE RALPH WRIGHT, IN 1992, ARGUING AGAINST THE STATE WILDLIFE COMMISSION»S DECISION TO REINTRODUCE MOOSE HUNTING IN VERMONT AFTER A 96 - YEAR HIATUS

I mean technically you can argue against almost any decision, but its telling that these fans will always argue against anything seemingly favouring Arsenal.

There could be a case to argue if incorrect refereeing decisions kept going against you (as they did with West Ham last season) that you have been the victim of misfortune; but if it is simply your players not being able to do there job effectively (e.g. by converting goal - scoring opportunities) then this is a reflection of ability or coaching rather than luck.

Many fathers» rights proponents argue that the legal system is biased against fathers when it comes to family decisions, leaving many dads who desire to share parenting responsibility without the chance to do so.

He argued that a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision tossing out the corruption case against former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell showed that his actions also did not involve illegalities.

«I believe that we should now take the decision to extend British air strikes against ISIL into Syria,» he wrote, ahead of a speech in parliament on Thursday where he will formally argue his case for war.

The U.S. Justice Department has filed court papers in a New York case arguing that a major federal civil rights law does not protect employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation, taking a stand against a decision reached under President Barack Obama.

Walmart defended its business practices and its decision not to testify in front of the Council, arguing that the scrutiny of their yet - to - be-finalized plan amounted to discrimination against the chain.

Other legislators agreed with the general sentiment that high - density housing was dangerous and unsustainable, with Day calling the hazard an «abomination» and speaking out against the high - density, multi-family Patrick Farm development but disagreeing with Schoenberger by arguing the county can insert itself into local planning decisions in certain circumstances.

«I'm going to run against him,» he said, arguing that the governor made too many decisions based on public opinion polls.

The decision represents the end of a years - long battle over the future of Playground 89 on West 89th Street that pitted fellow parents and residents against each other over the renovation, which many argued was needed to prevent injuries to kids.

Cohen and Molo argue that two of the three counts against Silver are undone by the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Skilling, which came four years after former Enron C.E.O. Jeffery Skilling was found guilty in 2006 of fraud and other charges in the collapse of the Texas energy giant.

But a federal judge dismissed Ms. Vazquez's complaint against Mr. Astorino and terminated him as a defendant in the lawsuit July 18, after he argued he had legislative immunity over staffing decisions as county executive and that Ms. Vazquez had not proven he was personally involved in the matter.

During a four - day public hearing in front of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, which made the final decision on the rules, the Colorado Oil & Gas Association (COGA) and the Colorado Petroleum Association argued against the methane controls in the rules.

In an emphatic letter published today in Science, 11 researchers argue that NIH should reverse its decision against funding studies in which scientists implant human stem cells into early, nonhuman embryos.

Some of Good Kill justifies Niccol's decision to argue against a major foreign - policy issue via a fiction feature.

The Academy also argued against the inspectors» assessment of it being inadequate, claiming that the decision was unreasonable.

David Welch, the Silicon Valley billionaire who financed a Vergara communications team, Students Matter, and the same legal team that argued successfully against California's Prop 8, had this to say after the decision was released yesterday:

Community leaders led protests against the schools, arguing that changes were coming from the top down and the top was made up of mostly white decision makers.

(1) The Vergara Decision: This case pits nine Oakland public school students against the State of California, arguing that (a) granting tenure after less than two years, (b) retaining teachers during layoffs based on seniority instead of merit, and (c) the near impossibility of dismissing incompetent teachers, is harming California's overall system of public education, and is disproportionately harming public education in low income communities.

A vigorous dissent by three judges, argued, «By erroneously affirming the district court's decision, we allow the State of California to perpetuate discrimination against qualified minority teachers, who are already seriously underrep - resented in the California public school system, and, derivatively, against minority students as well.»

It's hard to argue against the fact that Porsche made the right decision branching out from coupes and convertibles.

The BoC's decision has been the subject of much debate — recent low interest rates were intended as an economic stimulus coming out of last year's recession, and some economists have been arguing that rates should stay low for the time being as a measure of protection against global market turmoil.

In the New Yorker, Vinson Cunningham speaks to the artist Stanford Biggers, while on ArtNet, Tim Schneider looks at the arguments against the Met's decision to introduce a mandatory entrance fee and argues that we should «focus less on political gestures made inside galleries than on organizing for social causes outside of them».

After the «recklessness» of the decision by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity to move against ocean fertilisation experiments, one argued, we shouldn't «encourage international bodies to go around declaring moratoria».

He argues that «for too long the partnership model has mitigated against clear, business decision - making.

· JCCF to argue that the Barristers» Society decision against TWU law school graduates violates Charter section 2 (d) freedom of association

Convinced the NLRB to overturn an administrative law judge's decision against a client company, arguing successfully that the union's aggressive and unconventional behavior in presenting grievances to the company rendered the union's conducted unprotected by law (338 NLRB No. 78)

In October 2010, both banks appealed against the Decision, arguing that the Council had not advanced any evidence in support of its claim.

You didn't specify which country, but in the U.S. the legal system is full of precedents: previous case decisions from which a lawyer can argue your case or against your case.

The fact that Google - Motorola argues against the significance of Judge Posner's ruling, implicitly announcing an appeal and belittling it as a «non-binding district court decision» (Judge Posner, a circuit judge who usually only hears apeals, was sitting «by designation» on a district court for that particular case), shows that some people made a mistake (or purposely wanted to mislead) by portraying the ruling as a defeat only, or mostly, for Apple.

That evidence is never tested under cross examination nor can it even be argued against (say in closing argument) since the Judge's analysis only gets revealed for the first time in the actual decision.

Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.»

Our Coalition argued that the Tribunal decision wrongly increases the burden of proof required of people who claim that they are being discriminated against, making it harder to win these kinds of cases.

The Applicant also argued that since there is no limitation period for applying for catastrophic designation or for disputing an insurer's denial of a catastrophic application, to accept Economical's position would be to accept that insurers can create a time limit / limitation period for when an insured must apply for catastrophic impairment determination, which goes against recent decisions such as Guarantee v. Do and Machaj v. RBC.