However, I can't
argue against the fact that this system is a «Tested and Trusted» one.
I am glad that Alexis» performances last season has ensured that few people can
argue against the fact that he is not far off the level of Suarez!
It's hard to
argue against the fact that Philip Lahm has been one of the best players to have performed for Germany and Bayern Munich in recent times.
It is hard to
argue against the fact that countries are influenced in their strategic thinking and security policies by historical narratives of their respective national «cultures», which have sources in history, a shared sense of identity, folklore and cultural heritage.
There is
no arguing against the fact that the trial of Rebekah Brooks, Andy Coulson and others has been a disaster for British journalism, and has catastrophically worsened its reputation.
No one will
argue against the fact that high cholesterol is associated with a higher risk of heart attack and stroke.
It's not caused by the internet but you can hardly
argue against the fact that where crime happens you need crime prevention.
Those new options have made a significant impact on Connecticut's achievement gap — you can not
argue against the fact that charter schools have changed the lives of inner - city children of color who may not have otherwise had success in education.
Yet despite the evidence, some traditionalists and otherwise - sensible reformers who continue to
argue against the facts.
It's hard to
argue against the fact that Porsche made the right decision branching out from coupes and convertibles.
Even strong opponents of mortgage insurance find it hard to
argue against this fact: PMI, on average, yields 530 % return on investment.
No one can
argue against the fact that we have a surplus of dogs and cats.
If anything you should debate the importance of these titles on Switch, not try to
argue against facts regarding downgrades of those games.
James, are
you arguing against the fact that cheep energy (and the CO2 it causes) and quality of life are linked?
Mostly, the democratic senators were effective in giving the impression that the scientists were
arguing against the fact that temperatures have been rising rather than what the implications are.
What I want to say is that it's stupid to
argue against facts.
True, the talk of the end of industrial culture may not play well with those who see a darker side of Transition Towns, but it seems hard to
argue against the fact that our current reliance on fossil fuels to feed and clothe ourselves leaves us incredibly vulnerable to future price shocks and disruption of supply.
For those who still
argue against the facts, I would simply ask you to consider this: What if you are wrong?
It's hard to
argue against the fact that the Google Nexus 6P and Nexus 5X are — to date — two of the best phones to have ever graced the Nexus lineup.
There's
no arguing against the fact that the Huawei Honor 8 is one of the best phones that money can buy out there.
No matter who you talk to, I don't think anyone can
argue against the fact that the Galaxy Note 8 is one of the most powerful phones you can buy right now.
There is
no arguing against the fact that Google Pixel XL and OnePlus 3T are the two of the best devices in the smartphone world right now.
Not exact matches
Blessed are the Cheesemakers You are doing it again,
arguing your concept of god
against God who in
fact exists in form and substance as expressed.
I'm not saying the unnecessary suffering of animals is good, or moral, but rather pointing out that your perspective on the subject is no more rational, no more based on
fact, than that of the people you are
arguing against.
It's a great stretch to state that we've learned religious
facts to
argue against religion.
Although scientists behave as if their theories are
facts, often
arguing ferociously
against critics, key paradigms of science can shift rapidly and fundamentally when empirical evidence reaches a tipping point.
I was simply
arguing that that accidental
fact should not constitute an essential psychological identity for anyone, and that the frequent occurrence of this identity could never ground a proscription
against same - sex sodomy anyway.
The very
fact that, in 2012, a presidential candidate from one party can create instant headlines by
arguing against a speech made by a presidential candidate of the other party, more than 50 years ago, should be enough to convince any fair - minded American that we still have much work to do as we try to reason with each other about these questions.
It is so sad that so many atheists will spend most of their lives fighting and
arguing against the very thing that can save them, only to die and go to hell and then to spend eternity regretting the
fact that they wasted all of their time
arguing about it rather than just accepting it, rather than just believing, and a belief that could have saved them.
In
fact, the variety of subjects treated and the
fact that Mark and Luke use some of these sayings in other contexts
argue rather persuasively
against a single audience and a single occasion.
So then all the Christians constantly
arguing against gays are actually suppressing the
fact they know being gay is normal and they should be allowed to marry.
In
fact, for the very reasons you suggest, Chromosome 2's fusion
argues against the literal view of a genetically perfect Adam / Eve who only suffered mutation after the fall, that is, an overnight fixation of this fusion throughout the entire human population.
Of course, people on the left can be morally arrogant, but it would have helped if he had offered some specific evidence rather than simply the
fact that those writers had
argued on moral terms for a stronger presumption
against war or a greater redistributive role for the state.
The
fact that negatives are intrinsically difficult to prove is an aspect of disbelief that is incorrectly used those
arguing against it.
Only you would postulate that watching Coquelin spray the ball all over the place can somehow be
argued against as
fact...
Historical
fact... while watching ARSENAL TV you tube saw Piers Morgan rant
against WENGER, start watching it because thought it was his most recent remarks about ARSENAL current situation, so why not lets see what he has to say, well he
argue about poor results, the worse we have been since moving to the Emirates, lack of leadership, poor tactics, underperforming players, but what hit me was when he mentioned our exit from CL
against Bayern
arguing did not have what it take to overcome 0 -2 defeat
against Bayern.....
It would be very difficult to
argue against the findings, after all they are
facts, or stats if you prefer.
AL It's hard to
argue against some simple
facts man city and chelsea have spent billions of pounds on players and wages.
Charting the history of both US and UK political leaders, Brown also
argues against the notion that leaders have become more powerful when in
fact «[t] here have been a great many zigzags» (p. 82).
The simple
fact of that matter is that the same politicians who will
argue for «Voter ID» will also
argue against free and easy to obtain national identification.
In
fact you can
argue that this administration's done more
against the Pakistani Taliban with the Drones and UAV's (unmanned aerial vehicle) that the president a year ago authorized to be used.
Ed Miliband
argued against the move, despite the
fact the change will save households # 3.5 billion in energy bill payments in the years up to and including 2020.
But Trump, in
fact, may be Cuomo's best argument
against Nixon, Arzt said, noting the governor could
argue, «You have a novice in Washington, and look at what a mess he's made of the nation, if not the world, in terms of destabilizing it.
«However, I am encouraged by the
fact that when he ran for president, he stated his support for consent - based siting and spoke
against Yucca Mountain,
arguing that if Nevadans do not want a nuclear repository, then they should not have it.»
At present, such radiation is not observed, a
fact that again
argues against this separation.
It's worth mentioning that Berkhan is one of the guys most responsible for the «I.F. movement,» and spent years
arguing against ideas that many fitness pros (myself included) thought were «
fact.»
Arguing is pointless, the immovable myths stand firm
against sports science
facts.
-LSB-...] Even if you worked purely on the
fact that all students were ensured a consistent diet of modelling, questioning, checking, practice and assessment, planned in a shorter space of time and delivered by a less stressed, more focused and confident teacher, collaborative planning can't be
argued against.
«It's a cruel
fact, as those who will
argue against boxing say, that the goal is to inflict a concussion
against your opponent,» says Dr. Alan Rosenthal, the chief of neurosurgery at Winthrop Hospital and Schneider Children's Hospital in New Hyde...
But it would force them to actually
argue against the standards based on some semblance of the
facts and their interpretation of conservative first principles.