My guess is that it will be a difficult case to
argue against the impact of the contraceptive coverage rule as anything but an «incidental effect» given it targets a market and there's no evidence that the rule is over or under inclusively fashioned as a pretext to target the religious beliefs of those opposed to contraception.
Not exact matches
Collins, a moderate who voted
against the GOP's efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare earlier this year, says the bills will offset the
impact of the loss of the individual mandate, but experts largely disagree,
arguing that the elimination of the mandate will spike health costs and reduce choice in plans.
Exxon has
argued against all the other shareholder proposals as well, including a «policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity»; a policy articulating Exxon's «respect for and commitment to the human right to water»; «a report discussing possible long term risks to the company's finances and operations posed by the environmental, social and economic challenges associated with the oil sands»; a report of «known and potential environmental
impacts» and «policy options» to address the
impacts of the company's «fracturing operations»; a report of recommendations on how Exxon can become an «environmentally sustainable energy company»; and adoption of «quantitative goals... for reducing total greenhouse gas emissions.»
John Richardson Agreed, I am not
arguing against evolution simply saying it does not change or
impact the Bible story of creation.
Beyond its use as a tool
against large financial institutions, Schneiderman has used the act as a basis for a probe into ExxonMobil,
arguing that its alleged failure to disclose to its shareholders and the public research that showed the potential
impact of climate change constituted a Martin Act violation.
Yet the report also
argued against a rapid shift to non-fossil fuel energy sources, noting that «making significant changes in energy consumption... amid all the scientific uncertainties would be premature in view of the severe
impact such moves could have on the world's economies and societies.»
• Epstein says the DOJ and ED err when
arguing against disciplinary policies on the basis of «disparate
impact,» a phrase with a legal history that, «when applied to schools, imputes race - conscious behavior on the part of school administrators.»
But the DOJ and ED err in
arguing against the policies on the basis of «disparate
impact,» a phrase with a legal history that, when applied to schools, imputes race - conscious behavior on the part of school administrators.
Those new options have made a significant
impact on Connecticut's achievement gap — you can not
argue against the fact that charter schools have changed the lives of inner - city children of color who may not have otherwise had success in education.
As someone who constantly
argues against so many modern videogame practices I should take a more critical stance in my reviews and to a degree that's something I'm working toward doing, but it requires essentially altering a large chunk of personality and in doing so presents a concern that it could quite badly
impact my own personal enjoyment of games.
While some are skeptical of the strike's potential
impact, others
argue that it's a necessary statement
against «normalizing» the new president, while others purport that the proposed strike is only sowing seeds of divisiveness.
Arguing against the alleged human activity's
impact on global warming is politically incorrect.
However, it is plausible to
argue that implementing Kyoto has distracted attention and effort from real opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect society
against climate
impacts.
You can read more about some of the environmental
impacts of eating meat here (you might find different numbers elsewhere, but the general idea that it's inefficient is pretty hard to
argue against).
He clarified to Campus Reform that many scientists do not
argue against slight warming of the Earth after the Little Ice Age (the unusually cool period of the Earth around the 1700s A.D.), nor do those critical of anthropogenic climate change
argue that humans have made no
impact on the planet, merely that the effect has been small and largely beneficial.
The person
against whom the order is sought can
argue that the
impact on their privacy and security of the person would be grossly disproportionate to the aim of the order.
Counsel who wish to
argue that a cost award
against their client should consider the deductibility of legal fees by the recipient will bear the onus to set out for the judge what the
impact of the deduction will be.
As the debate over Farrow's piece expanded on Twitter, sociologist Zeynep Tufekci — an expert in the
impact of social - media on conflicts such as the Arab Spring revolutions in Egypt and the more recent demonstrations in Turkey —
argued that even free - speech considerations have to be tempered by the potential for inciting actual violence
against identifiable groups: