While there are many social, political, and economical reasons to
argue against the order, what part of the Constitution are these sources referring to?
If you do not live in the property as your main home, it is likely to be much harder to
argue against an order for sale.
Not exact matches
The government
argues the text of the
order does not mention any specific religion and is needed to protect the country
against attacks.
I know John 14:6 is the «go - to» verse in
order to
argue against this, but the Gospel of John could have easily been wiped from the slate - again, it is because Irenaeus chose to include it that Christians embrace it word for word.
Against this it
argues for fresh thinking about the economic
order, a thinking that locates the human economy in the larger economy of nature.
Madison's words were taken from a lengthy argument
against a specific bill in Virginia's legislature which would have levied a tax in
order to financially support the teaching of Christianity, and he
argued against such a tax on the grounds that past legal support of Christianity had led to its corruption.»
This affirmation stands
against a strand of the classical tradition that
argues we must affirm death in
order to fully embrace life, «that we can not see life clearly except through the lens of death, but that once we have seen it with such clarity, we can savor it.»
In
order to
argue against the seventeenth century's view that compound bodies are not real substances, Leclerc is forced to go beyond Leibniz, however.
«A protective
order will avoid placing Harris Beach and William Garry in the perilous position of protecting their Fifth Amendment rights
against self - incrimination,»
argued James Perkins, an attorney for Harris Beach.
In the application challenging the bench warrnt issued
against him, Tompolo is
arguing that the EFCC did not follow due process of law in applying for an
order of substituted service of the criminal charge
against him, adding that no service of the charge was effected as directed by the court before the EFCC applied for a warrant of arrest
against him.
Jonathan Baldie Editor, The Pryer Community
orders are not cost - cutting The article «Too Soft on Crime» (TP, June)
argued that community sentences are an insufficient deterrent
against society's worst repeat offenders.
One could also
argue that the US would try to avoid using nuclear weapons
against North Korea in the case of a retaliation attack in
order to prevent larger tensions with Beijing and more risks to South Korea.
The New York State United Teachers
argues in the legal action that the confidentiality requirement — which the labor group says is essentially a «gag
order»
against teachers is unconstitutional and violates free speech rights.
The triumphant result is that the drinks colossus Diageo, as an example, could go on meeting junior ministers and special advisers to
argue against, say, minimum pricing for alcohol, while Alcohol Concern (annual income, less than # 1m) would have to jump through a chilling series of hoops in
order to take part in any kind of campaigning, with the risk of criminal charges if it were found in breach of a law that the Electoral Commission says is so opaque it can not confidently predict how it will police it.
Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said Qatada's case demonstrated the need for control
orders and why the opposition had
argued against the «weakening» of the government's counter-terror powers.
The executive
order could strengthen de Blasio's position
against potential lawsuits from developers, who could
argue the Council does not have the right to regulate the E.D.C.
«Yes there are those who
argue against the need for national tourism boards in the wake of the huge changes in the way we live, in the way we travel, and in the way we communicate in comparison to just 50 years ago, but I am one who still believes that the national tourism boards still have an important role to play, even if that role has to change in
order to accommodate the modern world, and in
order to make the most of the advantage it offers.
If one invokes low frequency natural variability to
argue against a near term projection, one has to get the low frequency variation to operate at high frequency in
order to act in time to counter the short term projection.
Had it turned out that climate sensitivity CS should be say 1.1 C / doubling in
order to make sense of the oscillations I would not
argue against that since I have no motivation to.
However, anti-coal opponents who led the lawsuit
against Perry's
order argue that even if the state needed to generate more electricity, it should have come from cleaner energy sources such as wind power.
And it is singularly unattractive to
argue that confidentiality should be recognised by the law in
order to protect the interests of a solicitor
against whom an adverse finding has been made.
On April 1, 2016, partner Benjamin Fenton, aided by associate Henry Martone, successfully
argued against the Medical Board's imposition of an Interim Suspension
Order against a physician.
In
order to get this patent granted, they
argued that the patent sets itself apart from the prior art by teaching that there be two different kinds of memory, one for the screen content and a separate one for the audio data that is generated, but Samsung's infringement theory
against Apple is that it's sufficient to have two different blocks of memory (even if we're talking about the same physical memory unit).
They
argued that the stigma attaching to having one's DNA on the «criminal database» interfered with their day to day living: knowing that their most intimate information was held by the government in
order that it could be run
against crime scene samples or used for other unspecified research purposes.
After the New Hampshire Supreme Court disbarred lawyer William Richmond and
ordered him to reimburse the state's Committee on Professional Conduct for the costs of bringing disciplinary proceedings
against him, Richmond filed for bankruptcy and
argued that the cost assessment should be discharged.
In a recent case before the Supreme Court, R v Forsyth and Mabey [2011] UKSC 9, two former directors of the British engineering company Mabey & Johnson Limited
argued unsuccessfully that an executive
Order made under the United Nations Act 1946 in relation to sanctions
against Iraq was ultra vires because it had been made 10 years after the relevant Security Council Resolution.
The person
against whom the
order is sought can
argue that the impact on their privacy and security of the person would be grossly disproportionate to the aim of the
order.
Can a database reflect that a defendant admitted to the simple assault as part of the trial strategy, in
order to
argue against the aggravated assault?
Successfully
arguing against such defenses typically requires a plaintiff to conduct a complete investigation in
order to be ready with a compelling factual analysis of the case that explores all of the relevant factual and legal issues at hand.
She subsequently brought a claim
against Lambeth in the County Court for breach of contract and
argued that suspension was not reasonable or necessary in
order for the investigation to take place.
Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action
against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking
orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court
against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to
argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.
UNISON applied for a judicial review of the Fees
Order and
argued that it was not a lawful exercise of the Lord Chancellor's statutory powers because the fees interfered unjustifiably with the right of access to justice under the common law and EU law, frustrated the operation of legislation granting employment rights, and discriminated unlawfully
against women and other protected groups.
You need a lawyer who can effectively manage evidence in
order to present facts that can not be
argued against, facts that will convince any jury that you deserve compensation.
They filed, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, a motion seeking an
order dismissing or staying the third party claim initiated
against them,
arguing Ontario courts did not have jurisdiction to hear the proceeding.
The defendant appealed
against conviction for an offence of racially aggravated threatening behaviour, contrary to the Public
Order Act 1986, s 4 and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (CDA 1998), s 31 (1)(a),
arguing that the phrase used was not capable of demonstrating hostility based on membership of a racial group.
[49] The plaintiff
argued that there should be a presumption
against the making of an
order for the availability or use of a CPC recording.
At 44, she
argues that it is not clear to what extent that injunction might be contrary to basic principles of Latvian substantive law or procedural law, especially since, as the referring court acknowledges, the Latvian legal
order does permit judgments as provisional measures without a prior hearing of the party
against whom enforcement is sought.
In - N - Out Burger is seeking a restraining
order against an online prankster who posed as the company's CEO at two Los Angeles restaurants,
argued with employees and in one instance took a hamburger from a customer, threw it to the ground and stepped on it.
In - N - Out Burger is seeking a restraining
order against an online prankster who posed as the company's CEO at two Los Angeles restaurants,
argued with employees and in one instance took a hamburger from a customer,...
Ripplinger also said the association was faced with two immediate options after receiving the bureau's findings and proposed remedies: to
argue against the bureau's proposals in front of the Competition Tribunal — a quasi-judicial body that has the authority to issue fines and prohibition
orders — or to seek a settlement with the bureau.