how can one compete /
argue against an organization who uses your money to argue or disagrees with you....
Not exact matches
During Trump's first head - to - head debate
against Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, Clinton
argued that there was «no doubt» that Russia was using cyberattacks
against American
organizations.
Trinity Lutheran sued,
arguing that this discrimination
against religiously - affiliated
organizations is unconstitutional.
Conor Gaugham weighed in with a Huffington Post article explaining that protestors are not simply «
arguing over chicken,» but over the 5 million in donations that Chick - fil - A --(the restaurant itself, not Cathy personally)-- has sent to
organizations that «fight to discriminate
against [gays and lesbians].»
Among those
arguing against the proposal were respected
organizations like the American Heart Association, the Texas PTA, the Partnership for Healthy Texas and the Texas Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
Now a concerned parent can find in one source all of the prevailing scientific research
arguing against the use of food as a reward, a chart showing every leading medical
organization which has condemned the practice, generally useful statistics on childhood obesity and even some colorful quotes from experts.
The New York State Catholic Conference has
argued against the window for years, saying it could potentially cripple parishes, school districts and other nonprofit
organizations in cases from decades ago that might be impossible to defend
against.
The Catholic Church has
argued that the 90 - day requirement is biased since current law gives an adult who was abused as a child up to the age of 23 to bring a lawsuit
against religious
organizations, the Boy Scouts and other private and nonprofit institutions.
Indian coal plants under the CDM received financial backing from the World Bank, sparking an outcry
against that
organization by groups that
argue that the bank's support for the coal industry is inconsistent with its other efforts to tackle climate change.
In April 1998, Art Robinson and his
organization the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, along with the Exxon - backed George C. Marshall Institute, co-published the infamous «Oregon Petition» claiming to have collected 17,000 signatories to a document
arguing against the realities of global warming.
The lawsuit, filed with with ATP's sister
organization, the American Tradition Institute (ATI),
argues that the RPS unconstitutionally discriminates
against coal power by regulating commerce outside state borders — which makes it tough for utilities to import electricity from out - of - state coal plants.
Nisbet
argues that «urgent calls to escalate the war
against climate skeptics may lead scientists and their
organizations into a dangerous trap, fueling further political disagreement while risking public trust in science».