Not exact matches
First question should always be, it is not just the rational science these
people are
arguing against, it also the numerous
other faiths, many of whom have their own doctrines of how the world started.
Childress
argued that war is fundamentally morally problematic, as the killing in war goes
against the prima facie duty of benevolence, which rules out killing or inflicting harm on
other persons: «[B] ecause it is prima facie wrong to injure or kill
others, such acts demand justification.»
† Christians do not really exist, they just pretend that they believe in God and
argue with non-religious
people while not knowing very much at all regarding Christianity or the meaning of the bible and disregarding half of what the bible says only to strongly vocalize their stance
against the
other half of the bible that is
against things that they either do not understand or that do not affect them personally.
Schubert Ogden, author of The Reality of God and
Other Essays and an outstanding process theologian,
argues against subjective immortality, which he defines in the second sense, as
people»... continuing to exist as subjects for the infinite future.
People taking the Bible (or any
other religious book) seriously
arguing against each
other is always funny.
In all honesty, the «religious
people» that don't legislate
against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and
other religions and
other denominations and
people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all
other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to
argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.
Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of
people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for
people using violence
against others, it's the
people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to
argue with me, that you actually read my responses.
It is not a case of one civilization or one
people against each
other,» Mr Reid
argued.
«Iain Dale says that Parkinson can not be
arguing against gay equality because Parkinson is himself gay» Unfortunately Conservative party LGBT
people do work
against the interests of
other LGBT
people.
An immediate annuity's ability to transfer money from
people who die early to those who die late is largely the reason that a recent study by former U.S. Treasury official Mark Warshawsky concluded that while an annuity didn't always provide more retirement income than using the 4 % rule or
other type of systematic withdrawal, it did so often enough that «it is hard to
argue against a significant and widespread role for immediate life annuities in the production of retirement income.»
The right language, on the
other hand, can create a solid case that few reasonable
people can
argue against.
Ethics, moral philosophy, is about balancing our personal wants and needs
against those of
other people, and, I have
argued,
against the needs of all
other life on Earth: the biosphere.
Among
other things, they
argued that this practice constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, violates the life, liberty and security of the
person, and discriminates
against mentally ill and Indigenous
persons.
I can't see how anybody could
argue against this sentiment — which could be the key to good technology — but I've yet to see any
other influential
people in tech work as hard towards that goal as Vestager has.