Sentences with phrase «argue for taking»

They argue for taking a longer view, modeling the previous 20,000 and the next 10,000 years, to put the climate changes being initiated today into proper geologic context.

Even pension income splitting has been cited as a possible target, which Hectors says would argue for taking advantage of spousal RRSPs, covered in this space last time.

There are many people who argue for taking a QB with the # 1 pick.

Her book Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxford University Press) argues for taking biblical metaphors seriously and for not translating them into some other idiom.

Certainly there are incentives to organise and argue for take - up.

As a leader who co-founded a high - performing charter school network and charter support organization, and who now leads Chiefs for Change, an organization of state and district leaders committed to educational excellence, I'm an ardent charter supporter — and I'm arguing for taking a look in the mirror.

Overall, this argues for taking risk in equities over credit.

Not exact matches

At the very least, it might be prudent for the BoC to separately take into account asset prices when it sets monetary policies (as I've argued in past columns stretching back to 2007).

When Hostess filed for bankruptcy last November, Stuffed: An Insider's Look at Who's (Really) Making America Fat author Hank Cardello argued in a piece for Forbes that Hostess could have avoided its financial troubles if it had taken advantage of health - conscious consumers, a group that contributes to a third of grocery market sales in the U.S..

In its latest Annual Report, it argued that «even if inflation does not rise, keeping interest rates too low for long could raise financial stability and macroeconomic risks further down the road, as debt continues to pile up and risk - taking in financial markets gathers steam.»

At Princeton, Al - Naji's interest in bitcoin led him to take courses in monetary history, where he spent office hours arguing with his professor about monetary policy, and the potential for decentralized currencies.

Much of this, it can be argued, is that HR analysis tends to focus on the past — for example how many staff have been hired, the number of days taken off sick and the volume of training delivered — rather than looking to the future to see what it may hold.

And given the relative dearth in exits, the city does lack the kind of alumni network that can be found in the U.S. and the U.K. Analysts argue that Berlin needs more entrepreneurs to either take their startups public or sell them for a hefty sum, so that those players can reinvest in German startups.

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, which represents the labels, recently released a report arguing it takes $ 1 million to break a new act, including money for recording, touring and marketing.

Fans were skeptical about exactly who was doing the cooking, with many on Twitter arguing that Kardashian - West couldn't have done the work and accusing her of taking credit for the family's Jamaican nanny's handiwork.

Others, such as consumer watchdog Public Citizen and the preventive medicine advocacy group Trust for America's Health (TFAH), had very different takes, arguing Cures mostly benefits pharma companies at the expense of other important public health initiatives.

Given where we are now, and given the prospects for actually getting a legislated solution, you could argue that you on DACA, just like Sen. Collins on marketplace fixes for health care, simply got taken.

Plus, these risk - taking CEOs argue, besides the physical release and the exhilarating adrenaline rush, there are in fact business reasons for their perilous pastimes.

For the bull detox to truly take hold, credit spreads will have to widen significantly, which could in turn signal a «decisive crack» in equities, he argues.

At the same time, Fisman and Sullivan take on some of the favorite punching bags of modern office culture — meetings, middle managers, expense reports, and the cubicle — and argue why there's good reason for them.

Some readers took me to task for arguing in last week's post that Trump has been «working overtime» to fulfill Harvard professor Graham Allison's prediction that the US and China, like Sparta and Athens in the 5th century BC, are «destined for war.»

Argued another: «Public - sector plans should be converted to defined - contribution plans to relieve those of us on our own private - sector defined - contributions plans from the burden of taking the investment risk for the public sector.»

Take marketing, an area that many argue is an area of weakness for RIM.

It can be argued that most online commerce is still happening on desktops, but if your site is inaccessible to mobile devices, you take yourself out of consideration for all those consumers who use multiple devices to research new businesses and products.

The political turn for The Swift Life is particularly interesting due to the fact that the pop singer herself famously avoids taking any political stance (with some critics arguing that her neutrality is a gambit aimed at maintaining the broadest possible appeal), with Swift even declining to denounce racist supporters who call her an «Aryan goddess.»

However, advocates of reforming executive pay — by linking it with performance and reducing incentives for risk - taking — argue the pay ceilings are so high they lack teeth.

Gorsuch took exception to the 10th Circuit's ruling denying Games - Perez's petition for an appeal, arguing that prosecutors had been able to prove that Games - Perez knew only that he was possessing a firearm, not that he knew he was a convicted felon while he possessed the firearm.

During the same conversation, George Magnus, a senior economic advisor for UBS took a fundamentally different stance, arguing that «the government is clueless.

Hedge fund Elliott has taken a stake of almost 3 percent in Sky, according to its latest filing, and other shareholders have also argued that Disney's agreement to buy Fox implies a higher value for Sky.

The concept of hiring a company to pay your bills for you (and argue with the telephone company if it messes something up) is pretty new, and so it's taken some time to get her business off the ground.

Because this took place on Twitter, some people took it waaay too seriously, with Americans generally arguing that dress codes for bars are outdated and Brits generally arguing that Americans don't know high standards when they see them:

In fact, I've found that slacking off makes me more productive because I slack strategically — meaning that I take breaks at designated times, for regular intervals, in ways that sharpen my focus when I sit back down to work,» she argues, asserting that «strategic slacking has enabled me to dramatically increase both the quality of my work and the amount I get done in a given day.»

She argues that by not taking tourism seriously, governments are both failing to fully capitalize on a booming industry and leaving their countries exposed to the destructive elements that accompany foreign travel: environmental degradation, lowered living standards for the poor, sex tourism, and all the subtler injustices and annoyances that materialize when droves of foreigners arrive on your shores demanding authentic cultural experiences.

Katz says that in the event Unblock Us was ever taken to court, it might be able to argue «fair dealing» as a defence on the grounds that it is providing content Canadians would otherwise not get to see and for which there is no justifiable reason.

When the European regulators charged Microsoft in 2000 for antitrust violations, the company ended up paying US$ 2.3 billion in fines, and some argue it became a much more cautious firm, taking fewer risks.

In the letter MasterCard argues that in comparison to its own network, transactions made through the Bitcoin network take longer to process, are more susceptible to hacks, and are only less expensive for merchants because the Bitcoin network doesn't face the same regulatory burden.

But now BAML argues a new technique called «sell - any - rip» should take its place, at least for the duration of 2018.

Led by firms like Morgan Stanley and Bank of America Corp., the industry has argued that costlier regulations would take away options for smaller investors, who would lose access to advice as well as investment choices.

I agree completely, and would even take it a step further and argue that illiquidity has been good for me, personally.

On the contrary, I will argue that you should start searching for — not taking, mind you — more risks, because engaging risks will lead you to new market opportunities.

But, I would argue, it would've been good for the House to take up its own public consideration.

Monetary policy alone clearly can not take the credit for these outcomes, but one can argue it has been supportive of them.

Paul Bloom, who was an executive at IBM for 16 years, including chief technology officer for telecom research before leaving in 2013, is among the optimists who argue that venture capital and other alternative channels of R&D investment will take up some of the slack, supporting innovation and economic growth.

At this rate it would take 25 years for disposable household income to raise by 10 percentage points of GDP, which I would argue is the absolute minimum consistent with real rebalancing.

Counsel for Ms. Ernst argued that these were inapplicable in light of the pleadings that Alberta Environment had acted in bad faith (these provisions explicitly limit immunity to acts or omissions taken in good faith).

We would argue it is the potential for increased protectionism, which mostly just took the form of rhetoric in 2017.

They point to an article that you wrote in March, I think, of 2012 in Policy Options, where you basically said, dirty oil, the tar sands it's called, dirty oil and the future of our country, where you argue that the development of the, as you use the word, tar sands, it's become a political term, by the way, as you know, is basically not necessarily good for the country, in fact it takes jobs away in the manufacturing sector of Ontario.

Hogan initially sued Gawker in federal court, but after a federal judge denied his motion for a preliminary injunction (which would have forced Gawker to immediately take down the post while the case was argued in the courts), he dropped the federal case.

Utilities argue that net metering amounts to an unfair subsidy for solar, not taking into account fixed costs like grid maintenance and labor.

This was not the only view, however, and some policymakers had argued for a number of years that there were indicators that could be used to detect financial imbalances and that in some circumstances policy settings should take these imbalances into account.