They address issues when needed and they even
argue from time - to - time and know how to make amends if the conflict gets a little out of hand.
It's normal for parents to disagree and
argue from time to time.
My wife and i will
argue from time to time on the basis of our jugdments of one another... guess what... we still love one another and accept each other.
That «secular» literature might have meant something to someone in Solomon's court has been
argued from time to time about certain proverbs and wisdom texts, but not about texts where God is the main actor in the story — and certainly not in the manner of Bloom, where J suddenly sounds like a skeptical college professor who is much more «mature and sophisticated» than the believers in his midst and their God.
Not exact matches
In the in - depth piece she enumerates a long list of innovators —
from Ernest Hemingway to Steve Wozniak — who felt solitude was central to their work, before going on to
argue that it's not just artists and inventors who need to carve out more
time alone.
Many
argue China's US$ 2 trillion in foreign reserves would protect it
from any crisis, but Chovanec points out there have only been two
times in modern history when a country accumulated such large reserves — America in the»20s and Japan in the»80s.
«In this unique exploration of the role of risk in our society, Peter Bernstein
argues that the notion of bringing risk under control is one of the central ideas that distinguishes modern
times from the distant past.
As the DOJ's complaint against the merger
argues, the resulting conglomerate might «use its control of
Time Warner's popular programming as a weapon to harm competition» by raising the prices it charges other cable networks for
Time Warner entertainment or limiting distribution of content
from other producers.
Defenders of the paper, however, have
argued that the Sulzbergers have kept the
Times from being swept under amid all the turmoil going on in the media world and have preserved the quality and purpose of the newspaper because of their personal commitment to it — and the view that they are merely stewards of the company maintaining it for future generations.
In 2001, the Hill
Times wrote that Harper
argued that «pulling their children
from «union - run» schools should be a viable option for all parents.»
DR's simulations assume that last dot climbs in
time to give the Fed some height to drop
from when the next downturn hits (importantly, he stresses that the neutral funds rate is very likely lower than it used to be), but, as I
argue in the piece, with some evidence
from market expectations of the funds rate, I'm skeptical.
Additionally, the Tax Policy Center has
argued that many businesses with too little income or are losing money don't benefit
from bonus depreciation, especially in
times of economic recovery, and that it may not have much of an impact on long - term investment.
The wireless company
argued there is plenty of competition
from content companies such as Disney and new media powerhouses like Google and Netflix that would counterbalance its influence if it were to take over a content shop like
Time Warner.
Their breakup is described in terms so muted as to be inhuman: «Jealousy did rear itself in their shanty
from time to
time, and the couple that was uncoupling did
argue, but mostly they granted each other more space, a process that had been ongoing for quite a while, and if there was sorrow and alarm in this, there was relief too, and the relief was stronger.»
I have spent
time worshipping within both the evangelical and Episcopalian traditions, and would
argue that evangelicals have much to learn
from more embodied - oriented traditions.
From the beginning of my
time as editor of First Things, I've
argued that progressivism represents a war on the weak.
In disputes with Jews, Christian thinkers in the early centuries
argued that the promises of return and restoration (in Isaiah, Ezekiel, and the minor prophets) must be interpreted to refer either to the
time of the exile in the sixth century B.G.E, i.e., the
time of the return
from exile in Babylonia, or to the new gathering of humankind in the church.
The Catalan Jaime Balmes engaged directly the philosophies of history of his
time, and his contemporary Donoso Cortes
argued that politics derives
from theology.
So today, if a teacher begins to
argue from Scripture that Jesus was either not fully divine or fully human, we'll rehearse the biblical passages and the traditional interpretations of those passages that have stood the test of
time.
Those who want to
argue your position
from 1 John 3 often forget what John has already stated in 1 John 1 about how all of us still sin all the
time.
That is, many contemporary theologies tend to believe that we can derive the normative content of faith, truth and justice directly
from the immediate contexts of our social, economic and political situations; at the same
time, other contemporary theologies have abandoned even trying to
argue that theological claims are in any sense normative.
Arguing about why shit happens only diverts
time and energy away
from the thing all people of good will, regardless of their faith or nonfaith, should be concerned with, the thing all of us have some control over: what happens after shit happens.
Deeply indebted to the work of Albert Schweitzer
from the turn of the twentieth century, he has cogently
argued time and again for the historicity of the eschatological preaching of Jesus and the significance of the Passion.
I am
arguing for God, I am
arguing to free our understanding of God
from the prison of these doctrines — doctrines
from a particular
time and place that are too often considered to be our final destination, instead of guideposts along the way; doctrines that are too often used to stop questions instead of to help find answers.
At a
time when «Just say no» summarizes the depth of our national moral discourse, De-Marco has the reflective intelligence to
argue that» because we do not have the luxury of being steeped in virtuous habits
from birth» the virtuous life must be actively pursued.
Islam mentioned this for the longest
time and as you can imagine, at a
time when people had no access or means to verify those claims (people like yourself, opted to disbelief and
argue about the existence of God) but now that those scientific «discoveries» became realities and the same as supported by the Quran (that was sent to Prophet Mohammed, Peace and Blessings be upon him),
from God), it only solidifies Islam as the true religion of God.
A few days later I traveled over a different West Bank road, this
time from Jerusalem to Latrun, a journey taken to gain perspective on the terrain over which so many previous battles have been fought and where future boundary lines may some day be
argued.
Other
times, as when he
argues from the supposed uniformity of our perceptual field to the uniformity of the spatiotemporal continuum, Whitehead begins with direct experience (PW 217-21/240 -45).
Since Paul is a biblical figure, one could
argue that the Bible sets the standard for the nature of the church and, since that
time, faithfulness requires that we do not deviate
from the biblical standard.
The Verve had licensed a sample
from The Rolling Stone's song «The Last
Time,» but it was later
argued that The Verve used «too much» of the sample, including some bongo drums which had not been licensed.
Whilst this approach was disturbing for many Christians at the
time, it again meant that defenders of Christianity, instead of calling for a leap of faith, could start
from historical events and
argue from them to the divinity of Jesus Christ His divinity was seen as the perfection of his humanity and this fitted with the approach of Schleiermacher, who saw Jesus, whose consciousness was entirely taken up with awareness of God, as «the ideal representative of religion».
After World War II the executive branch of government
argued that it needed absolute power in foreign affairs because (1) in a nuclear age, when missiles can make the trip
from Moscow to New York in 20 minutes, there is no
time to consult Congress and the people, and (2) the «secret, subversive» techniques of the communists can be challenged only by subversion and secrecy on our part.
Terry, take it
from one who has probably been around the block a few more
times than you —
Arguing Scripture and your understanding of them and insisting that only your understanding of them is correct will get you nowhere as fast as possible.
We'd have to multiply that timeline of accomplishments and expansion by 5,000
times to approach the
time it would take for our species to evolve... so are you
arguing that we have been here 5,000
times the thousands of years we took already to climb
from dirt farmers to technology - driven cultures?
In a new St Augustine's Press book The Regensburg Lecture Fr James Schall S.J.
argues that «far
from being disrespectful of Islam or of modern thought (the lecture) is almost the first
time the ultimate dimensions of both have been taken seriously and seen in their relationship to each other and to reason.»
Arguing from the standpoint of, «well the odds are just way too high» is tantamount to saying it's impossible to flip a coin 10
times and it landing on hands every
time.
In a footnote Griffin
argues that my argument for this is unsound, because I «downplay the extent to which, over
time, even very small deviations
from the divine aims would lead to enormous gaps between the actual and what would have been ideal in an abstract sense.»
Indeed, it might plausibly be
argued that the essential and universal meaning of this ancient story can be grasped most profoundly only when the story is set free
from any connection with an actual occurrence in
time and space.
Regardless of how one translates the text, these issues do not affect in any way the main point I am
arguing here, that the people at the
time of the flood told God to depart
from them, to leave them alone.
We would
argue that, like most secular humanists, he is cherry - picking whatever he finds personally comfortable
from the heritage of Judaeo - Christianity while leaving aside whatever doesn't suit the tastes and fashions of the
times.
Cross and Freedman
argue that the long poem is in its entirety the «Song of Miriam» and in its original form dates
from a
time no later than the twelfth century B.C.
• The WCED (1987) or Brundtland report
argued that the poor world could only be helped if there were an increase in the world economy
from between five to ten
times the present world economy.
[When I moved
from the Carolinas to Massachusetts for school] most of the white Southerners at the
time could recite long lists of battles lost and won and
argue over...
Offering five essays
from Times food critics — each replete with personal anecdotes and advice
from years of hosting banquets and parties — the series
argued for a revival of communal eating.
Against scholars who
argue that friendship as we understand it does not exist prior to, say, the Renaissance, he contends that an «abiding image of friendship as an intimate relationship predicated on mutual affection and commitment» has persisted
from ancient
times to our own.
And if we
argue that God needed the blood of an innocent victim in order to remove the stain of sin
from the world, the critic wants to know how killing an innocent victim is not a sin itself, and how the blood of such a victim can actually do anything for the sin of all people throughout all
time.
Nor were Catholics completely absent
from the scene: the Dominican Marie - Joseph Lagrange (1855 - 1938)
argued that the exegete could hold to the immutability of truth and, at the same
time, take seriously the growth of doctrine within Scripture.
Advocates of federally subsidized day care
from infancy tend to shrug off this kind of data and
argue that the next decade will inevitably lead to nearly three - quarters of families having two full -
time wage earners.
What I have called a leap —
from space to power and
time to process — is not
argued for but simply asserted.
Elsewhere 43 Ambrose
argued that Peter accepted the sheep
from Christ along with all subsequent bishops; indeed, in Peter the whole future episcopate was present, receiving proleptically what Peter at that
time assumed personally.