Sentences with phrase «argue in»

In keeping with this historical charge, I argue in a recently completed book, A Blessed Rage for Order: The New Pluralism in Theology (to be published by Seabury this spring), that there are presently five major operative models for fundamental theology: the orthodox, the liberal, the neo-orthodox, the radical and what may be tentatively labeled the revisionist.

In fact, one can defend a high view of Scripture without recourse to the term «inerrancy» as I shall argue in this chapter.

Christians must not claim that Christian revelation makes Christianity superior to other religions, she believes: «What Christianity has going for it is its substantive proposal of a way of life — a way of life over which Christians argue in the effort to witness to and be disciples of Christ, and with which they enter into argument with others.»

To argue in good faith, to criticize with grace, to demolish without malice» every writer should aspire to such heights.

It has allowed us to develop genetically modified crops (let's not debate the wisdom of that move here) and has allowed us all to argue in this forum (just for fun since no one voicing an opionion is likely to be swayed in the least).

Indeed I argue in several writings that when Darwin spoke of «chance variations» he was more right than he knew and that something like evolution is what a sound theology requires.

That Wyschogrod would seem to argue in favor of Torah observance among baptized Jews might strike some as quite incredible.

That is what I am trying to argue in this series.

Davis» lawyers argue in the court papers that Kentucky's new law gives «the very religious accommodation Davis sought from the beginning of this litigation.»

In other words, the presence of multiple accounts of some incredible flood in ancient times would argue in favor of such an occurrence, rather than assume they all borrow upon each other.

In the complicated situation of the present day, we shall very often have to argue in real earnest and bitterly, and precisely while appealing to Christian principles and the Christian spirit.

Some of the essays seem designed to argue in defense of some claim such as this: Such - and - such a theological tenet is a truly Biblical tenet, that is, is part of the doctrinal theology of a Biblical writing.

One of the most important things to understand about SR, he says, is that «mutual hospitality is more than learning to argue in courtesy and truth, although that's part of it.»

For example, I am going to argue in the next lecture that Wesley was a liberal.

I will argue in what follows that these metaphysical characters do not necessarily follow upon the adoption of a logic that is not dialectical, i.e., modern mathematical logic.

As I argue in my new book «Gray Matters: Navigating the Space Between Legalism & Liberty,» there are many perfectly good things in the world that can go wrong when we consume them recklessly.

Kirk then examines efforts to argue in favour of the ordination of women from Scripture and Tradition, exposing the sparseness of the proposed evidence and uncovering remarkable deficiencies in historical scholarship.

It is interesting that those who argue so vigorously for new plants as ways of bringing jobs do not often argue in favor of substituting labor - intensive for energy - intensive means of production in either farm or factory.

Both sides in the dispute over the reality of an educational canon argue in just this way, presupposing the truth of their predetermined views concerning the nature of reality and hence of how best to learn about it.

That's what I am trying to argue in my book anyway.

But surprisingly, Martin is very harsh in his criticisms of those evangelicals who, like C. Stephen Evans, argue in this fashion.

We shouldn't be able to say a mother needs to get one, but we definetley have a right to argue in debate about the issue

Religion can not claim moral superiority and I think Atheism has a strong case to argue in its favour in this context.

To go along with this, you have to believe three things, all controversial: (1) that authenticity is a valid idea; (2) that you can argue in reason about ideals and about the conformity of practices to these ideals; and (3) that these arguments can make a difference.

It is a reference to Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort making fools of themselves on national television trying to argue in favour of creationism.

How can a nation of people miss the outright hypocrisy of using a belief system ostensibly predicated on compassion, charity and humility to argue in favour of genocide?

Sometimes, to keep the peace and not argue in front of a dying family member, a decent person will let the asshole have his say.

Of course believers are tempted, when they hear postmodern deconstructions of modernity, to argue in support of modernity.

As I mention above, the issue needs to be raised to believers and non-believers alike: How can a nation of people miss the outright hypocrisy of using a belief system ostensibly predicated on compassion, charity and humility to argue in favour of genocide?

It is amazing to see Santorum misinterpret, invent facts, and argue in favor of nonsensicle positions with a straight face.

in a post so full of misinformation that it could be used as an example of how not to argue in a classroom.

The christians would argue in response to your point that god essentially commands them to convert as many souls as possible so that those people (you!)

Though most opinionated economists would argue in favor of one possibility, the truth is prices could go anywhere; they could rise steadily after this temporary plummet, they could hover as they reach a fair valuation, or they could plummet even further.

There's no need to argue in depth that it is important for a trader to learn as much as they can.

But Fortress and Dune argue in court papers that, as per the terms of their joint - venture agreement, Eichner is required to settle the matter in arbitration — and only after a default is declared.

And the reason I argue in the book that earlier depression was over so quickly was because the federal government really did sit back and do nothing, they actually slashed spending because this was right after World War I.

-- Cornelius Vanderbilt Most people will argue in the positive...

At the very least, these trends argue in favor of higher hurdles for new investment.

But as Dean and I argue in Chapter 4 here, the most reliable way to reduce the debt is to run the economy at full employment.

We argue in a forthcoming book that most companies with sustainable growth share attitudes and behaviors: (1) They view themselves as business insurgents, fighting in behalf of underserved customers; (2) they have an obsession with the front line, where the business meets the customer; and (3) they foster a mindset that includes a deep sense of responsibility for how resources are used and for long - term results.

As I argue in my forthcoming book, «The Known Citizen: A History of Privacy in Modern America,» big corporations (in this case, Facebook) and political interests (in this case, right - wing parties and campaigns) but also ordinary Americans (social media users, and thus likely you and me) all had a hand in it.

DR's simulations assume that last dot climbs in time to give the Fed some height to drop from when the next downturn hits (importantly, he stresses that the neutral funds rate is very likely lower than it used to be), but, as I argue in the piece, with some evidence from market expectations of the funds rate, I'm skeptical.

In addition, as I argue in my book, the rhetoric of gay rights changed.

Paxton, a Republican, attached a brief in asking the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in California for permission to argue in support of Trump's temporary ban on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

It's OK to argue in an interview.

As I argue in a forthcoming paper in the Georgetown Law Journal, there are cases in which we should think not in terms of the rights the corporation should enjoy, but in terms of the appropriate limits to be placed on the corporation, understood as a tool for achieving human objectives.

The CEO and Chair of Futurpreneur argue in a new report that large companies have lots to learn from upstarts

At the very least, it might be prudent for the BoC to separately take into account asset prices when it sets monetary policies (as I've argued in past columns stretching back to 2007).

He argued in a blog post that a single figure, even the son of a king, in pushing for a great deal of change in a country where the politics and power accumulated over decades are complicated, could end up producing the opposite of stability.

When Hostess filed for bankruptcy last November, Stuffed: An Insider's Look at Who's (Really) Making America Fat author Hank Cardello argued in a piece for Forbes that Hostess could have avoided its financial troubles if it had taken advantage of health - conscious consumers, a group that contributes to a third of grocery market sales in the U.S..