While Christoph Cardinal Schönborn and Professor Stephen Barr were
arguing over questions of evolution and teleology in the last few issues of First Things, down in Pennsylvania Judge John E. Jones III was deciding Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
Even among our analytical team,
we argue over this question — see our recent blog post on the subject.
Not exact matches
We
questioned the downward profile of this adjustment,
arguing that risks / uncertainties increase
over time rather than decline and that larger and increasing adjustments for risk should have been made.
In a letter sent to Yahoo on Thursday, the investment firm Starboard Value
argued that the reason for spinning off the Alibaba stake — avoiding taxes while raising money for shareholders — appeared to have evaporated after
questions arose
over whether the Internal Revenue Service would crack down on such transactions.
In a debate that lasted more than eight hours, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras
argued that the commission is a requirement from the people who expect answers, and a way to eliminate any «revanchist» intentions for the «many
question marks» that have arisen
over the last five years.
But he
argued that it removed legal peril
over a possible campaign finance violation, a claim some legal experts have
questioned.
There was the weekly Sunday morning service, preceded by Sunday School, and it was invariable, no more to be
questioned or
argued over than attendance at regular....
There was the weekly Sunday morning service, preceded by Sunday School, and it was invariable, no more to be
questioned or
argued over than attendance at regular school on Monday morning.
As I have
argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way of thinking from its proper political context» the right use of sovereign public authority toward the end of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello judgments (proportionality of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity)
over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum
questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree of moral clarity about them).
They place another serious
question mark
over the modern rite because it could be
argued that the options and emphasis on interaction that is now an essential aspect of it have contributed to this situation.
It is not my purpose to
argue for the correctness of one or the other view of education, only to note that these are issues
over which reasonable people may differ, and to
question whether the State has a right to impose the first approach in the face of opposition from parents.
For well
over half a century, moreover, no biblical commentators, historians, or geographers of note have
argued that the sea in
question is the Red Sea, that is, the Gulf of Suez.
Men
argued bitterly
over the vexing
question.
However, activists have raised
questions over the need for a new water source and
argued more optimal results could be achieved with conservation of current resources.
Sir Bill Cash
argues the EU is trying «to create a constitutional crisis in the UK»
over the Irish border
question.
At a tense debate in February at UCLA where Jacobson
argued over the merits of supporting nuclear versus ramping up renewables, sharing the stage with nuclear supporters like Environmental Progress» Shellenberger and fellow Stanford climate scientist Ken Caldeira, the
question - and - answer session with the audience devolved into a shouting match.
In essence, physicists have been
arguing over a trick
question for 40 years.
They might [cost] $ 10 billion but it is $ 10 billion spread
over a decade; and I would certainly
argue that if we as a civilization don't have that kind of money to put together to ask [and] answer fundamental
questions then it's truly a sad reflection on our civilization.
Whether we're talking about free speech on Usenet, the policy
questions of legitimate marketing and com - mercial activity conducted
over email, or the desirable but spam - ish mes - sages that trip the filters and disappear, there is always friction not around the most egregious case (no one
argues for Leo Kuvayev's «\ / 1@gR / - \» messages) but at the blurry places where spam threatens to blend into acceptable use, and fighting one might have a deleterious effect on the other.
Most famously, in 2003, Soon co-authored a paper in the journal Climate Research that
questioned the standard interpretation of climate change
over the past millennium and
argued that recent warming is not unusual by historical standards.
Pundits and observers of all stripes have a whole host of
questions and developments to puzzle
over and
argue about this summer, until the fall festivals of Telluride, Toronto and Venice kick the race into gear once more.
The courage to build relationships and trust even when people are
questioning,
arguing (even yelling at you), the courage to ask others to change practices, their beliefs and try new things (despite years of experience behind them) and the courage and patience to have very exhausting, confusing and difficult days only to go back to work and start
over each and every morning; one conversation at a time, one priority at a time and all the time building your own confidence.
In a video that surfaced on social media
over the weekend, a man who appeared to be a representative from the NAACP can be seen
arguing and fielding
questions from a group of protesters.
By contrast, top - down efforts that don't involve close work
over sustained periods of time with the communities in
question over time are doomed to fail, as the state's own experience shows, Mr. Sciarra
argued.
That
question muttered by many a frustrated student
over the years has become a vigorous debate among American educators, sparked by a provocative new book that
argues required algebra has become an unnecessary stumbling block that forces millions to drop out of high school or college.
We then go
over that draft together, settling
questions,
arguing over choices, resorting to numerous dictionaries.
This
question is pondered (and
argued about) by the 13 Turner siblings and their children in this tender family saga as they must decide whether to sell the Detroit house that has been home to three generations
over 50 years.
Several commenters above have
argued that the circumstances leading to the outperformance of bonds
over the period in
question are not repeatable.
The artist's lawyers
argued that the painting was the creation of another man, Pete Doige, who had been incarcerated at the Thunder Bay correctional centre where Fletcher worked
over the period in
question.
A collective of African American artists including Charles Alston, Richard Mayhew and Hale Woodruff as well as Bearden and Lewis founded in 1963, Spiral artists dug deep into and
argued over philosophical
questions about how artists should engage with pressing Civil Rights concerns in their work.
And although a feedback loop has existed between vogue and pop culture for
over 20 years, some critics
question the presence of voguing in the mainstream,
arguing against the appropriation and co-option of what is, for many, a sacred tradition.
What I'm
arguing is that the idea that we can win the climate fight without engaging in ideological battle
over these core
questions about the role of government has always been a fantasy.
He
questions the time scale
over which climate is defined,
arguing that there is no defined time scale.
Chan and Liu (2004)
argue that current models are not yet sufficiently good for addressing the
question regarding global warming and typhoons (A typhoon is technically the same as a hurricane, the difference being that they form
over the western Pacific or the Indean Ocean).
I try to explain to all Global Warming detractors of your ilk... that it's fine to
argue over scientific points and ask
questions about the validity of Climate Models...... But the second you start chucking out comments like yours....»
On point, I am
arguing that you were treating the
questions over the value of consensus in the process of science, anc secondarily policy development based on science, as a one - size - fits - all type of situation.
Questions poke through the fabric of the movie as things get messy... Vik and his wife start to
argue on - camera about whether the project is hurting the catadores by taking them out of their environment and then, when it's
over, expecting them to return
However, one could also
argue that the tribunal's analysis honored the autonomy of EU law by coming to the only plausible conclusion on the
question of competence, and the tribunal's dictum that the ECT does not protect investors from the implementation of EU law is equally respectful of the autonomy of EU law, as it is premised on the invariable primacy of EU law
over the ECT.
Question: A handyman did some very shoddy work for my mother and then had the nerve to
argue with me
over getting paid.
Over the last 15 years as an Atlanta car accident lawyer, I have discussed, analyzed, asked deposition
questions and
argued about these procedures.
Trivial observations (e.g., long lists of Member States that have at any one time been involved in access to documents litigation without any convincing conclusion following from such an enumeration) are succeeded by confused conceptualisations (e.g., the EU institutions are introduced twice as a distinct category of actor), or even outright overdramatization, such as when the authors
argue that «[a] t one stroke, any authority of the Member States -LSB-...]
over the release of documents transmitted to the EU was set aside [by Regulation 1049/01]» (p. 216), but neglect to mention that the Member States as legislators in the Council agreed to this revision themselves, or that the Council engaged in successive internal negotiations to settle the
question of what was to be considered a «Member State document».
The whole debate
over articling reform comes down, as I've
argued previously, to the
question of whether articling is meant to ensure competence.
Are we supposed to compromise our independence, a compromise that is irreversible and will surely weaken us
over time, because some survey respondents answer the
questions in (a) their naked self - interest (and I would
argue that penny wise and pound foolish is contrary to their self - interest if they but knew it), or (b) out of ignorance or lack of knowledge?
«Your honor, I
question whether Mr. DeGuerre's client is telling us the whole truth,» the DA mused as he began to
argue why the judge should use her testimony to believe that codefendant was a pimp, but to disbelieve that she had no power or control
over the Older Friend's dope.
In a nutshell, the first paper
argues that, once we take stock of the developments in originalist thought (especially in the United States)
over the last 30 years — which too many Canadians who reject originalism out of hand have not done — we realize that the answer to its title
question is «no».
The
question of deference on
questions of procedural fairness will continue to hang
over Canadian administrative law until it is
argued and authoritatively resolved by the Supreme Court.
Two, in particular, have spent the past 48 hours
arguing over one
question: should Pokémon move beyond Nintendo's handhelds and onto the company's fully fledged console?
Bitcoin Core developer Peter Todd voiced concerns
over hasty uptake of the protocol before security
questions had been resolved this month,
arguing the potential for users to lose money made a fast rollout irresponsible.
Instead of
arguing over what a court would do if the case were tried, the
question is whether the court will approve the agreement the clients have reached.
But Ryan, a Wisconsin congressman who chairs the House Budget Committee, has chosen sides in the intra-party dispute
over that
question,
arguing that the mortgage market should be privatized.