Others like Connecticut Secretary of State Denise Merrill
argue public financing of campaigns is the answer.
Not exact matches
Campaign Finance Reform Can Help Crack Down on Corruption A 2011 report by the Center for Competitive Politics has been seized upon by opponents
of Fair Elections to
argue that the
public financing system in New York City is characterized by consistent abuse
of public funds and corruption.
The minority conference objected to the inclusion
of a
public campaign finance system and the DREAM Act, and
argued that the proposals would be bad for small businesses and taxpayers.
There's a continuing push for
public financing of campaigns,
arguing it removes the influence
of big money and allows challengers who would have trouble raising money to run.
This is a particularly interesting line
of reasoning from Dadey, since most Republicans are not fans
of the
public financing idea to begin with,
arguing that it's inappropriate to use taxpayer dollars to support political
campaigns.
The New York
Public Interest Research Group released its own recommendations to the commission on Monday, arguing in favor of public financing for camp
Public Interest Research Group released its own recommendations to the commission on Monday,
arguing in favor
of public financing for camp
public financing for
campaigns.
The report authors
argue charters have come to represent a force that «preempts traditional local control
of public schools» and spends «hundreds
of millions
of dollars to promote itself...
finance electoral
campaigns up and down the political ladder and hire publicists who spread misinformation, aggressively lobby, and paint charter opponents as part
of the problem they are solving.»