Not exact matches
Indeed, many
scientists would
argue that recent research results tend to suggest that the
public are right to be sceptical, both in terms of risks to human
health, and increasing problems for farmers growing GM crops.
Many
scientists, consumer organizations, and members of the European Parliament opposed the plan,
arguing that
public health should take precedence over business concerns — and Juncker relented.
Writer Mooney and marine
scientist Kirshenbaum
argue persuasively for
scientists to step up engagement with the
public, in order to dispel misinformation and foster meaningful civic participation in decisions about issues such as nuclear power, climate change, and
public health.
Since the bill attempts to tear down a ruling based on the findings of our nation's top
public health experts and
scientists — a ruling that a Supreme Court decision turned into a legal obligation to uphold — we're witnessing a case wherein Congressional politicians are actually
arguing that they know better than the conclusions of an entire body of science.