Sentences with phrase «argue special contribution»

Not exact matches

With Hughes being able to hold his own in some would argue one of the most demanding and physical leagues in the world, whilst expressing his technically gifted ability and providing a huge contribution, his potential to be a very special player can be seen by all.

It also offers a welcome contribution to the debate over reasons for America's special relationship with Israel, which many would argue no longer serves its best interests (and perhaps even perpetuates conflict in the Middle East).

Still, we should not discount the significance of what Citizens United meant for independent expenditures, something that Justice John Paul Stevens argued comes close to direct contributions: «The difference between selling a vote and selling access is a matter of degree, not kind and selling access is not qualitatively different from giving special preference to those who spent money on one's behalf.»

Into this debate wades Stanford University professor Terry Moe with his new treatise, Special Interest: Teachers Unions and America's Public Schools, in which he marshals evidence on elections, campaign contributions, and education governance to argue that unions have an exaggerated and detrimental impact on American schooling.

«Special contribution» has only been successfully argued on three occasions, each time by a man, but rich men keep trying to run the argument.

It therefore remains to be seen whether the doctrine of special contribution will ever be successfully argued again in the future.

At the hearing, one of the issues argued by the husband was that there should be a departure from equality on the basis that his «special contribution'to the matrimonial assets would be inequitable to disregard.

«It... remains to be seen whether the doctrine of special contribution will ever be successfully argued again in the future»

For ultra high net worth cases, where a spouse has generated significant wealth, they may argue that on divorce a departure from equality of division of the matrimonial capital should be ordered because they made a special and unmatched financial contribution to the marriage.

He argued that his special contribution justified a departure from equality in his favour.