Sentences with phrase «argue the point again»

Not exact matches

Again, my concern at that point was to argue for profound transformation, not to argue against continuity.

Also, I noticed that you completely went off the original topic again because you realized what an utter fool you were being arguing such an idiotic point.

We can also argue that this points us directly to the Mind of God, but again there is no space to go over that argument here.

The point is that contemporary scholarship, as we shall argue below, has been completely successful in explaining pericope after pericope on the basis of the needs and concerns of the early Church, and that over and over again pericopes which have been hitherto accepted as historical reminiscence have been shown to be something quite different.

However, although I don't see how this could be argued successfully, the key point again is that such an argument is necessary if the challenges in question are to have any force.

Here again Hasker has confused the frameworks, arguing as if hypothetical points relevant within one were relevant within the other.

Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to argue with me, that you actually read my responses.

When I see this again I feel riled and am more inclined to argue a point with someone from your side.

Two weeks ago I explained that bettors were overreacting to Golden State's recent struggles, and argued that they were once again offering value as a 7.5 - point favorite in Game 5 of the Western Conference Finals.

But, as with the recent rise in people going «retro» and reverting to vinyl, it could be argued that, at some point, we will see a surge in paperbacks again, despite environmental impact of printing hardcopies.

Many investors have talked about a «gold bubble» by arguing that gold prices are inflated because of inflation and the Fed's money policy and that once interest rates rise, the money supply will contract and gold will fall, but again, nobody can say with any reasonable accuracy what the fair value of gold at any given point is.

Now, at this point, you may want to remind me: a) shorting junior resource stocks can be difficult / impossible, and / or b) only a real idiot couldn't figure out (& take advantage of) such a blindingly obvious strategy!?! OK, in my defence: i) again, I point you to all those academic studies, and ii) there are legions of muppet investors out there who will (rather incoherently) argue the exact opposite in strategy... So here's the valid alternative to that trade

(Nine months later, in a special section of the Spring issue of The Wildlife Professional, Miller and David Jessup (another of the 14 co-authors on the 2008 paper, and a colleague of Miller's at the California Department of Fish and Game) were at it again, arguing simply, «the science points to cats.»

And seeing as World was basically the culmination of all things Mario up to that point, well, again, it's just hard to argue.

If a particular point has been argued to death previously and people have moved on (either because it was resolved, moot or simply from boredom), there is little point bringing it up again unless there is something new to talk about.

Time and again, Judge Judy's litigants get off the point to argue about who was right about minor, immaterial details.

On the latter point, he effectively was arguing that he would never work again in his old profession (and indeed he had decided to retrain as a teacher) so that compensation should reflect «loss of career», hence the high value.

Once the two of you settle into the thought that not talking about it is better than arguing about it, then you know that eventually it is going to rear its ugly head all over again at some point.