Sentences with phrase «argue this point quite»

Not exact matches

Quite the contrary, its purpose is to argue that the fundamental Thomist vision of finite existence as pointing to its self - sufficient cause is fully compatible with a doctrine of God that can embody the real strengths of the Thomist position without entailing its religiously and logically unsatisfactory conclusions.

Arguing the fine points of eschatology may not have been quite as pleasurable as dancing, but it came close.

This second point is important because the two issues are usually treated separately» as if what one argued about relations between members of the same sex was quite different from what one might argue about relations between people of different sexes.

Ball is quite unrealistic on the point: «But do I not thus argue for the kind of despotic judiciary which gave us Roe v. Wade?

It may be objected that this reference to play proves the point of the evil in real conflict; for it might be argued that the essence of play is that the conflict is not quite real.

The point is that contemporary scholarship, as we shall argue below, has been completely successful in explaining pericope after pericope on the basis of the needs and concerns of the early Church, and that over and over again pericopes which have been hitherto accepted as historical reminiscence have been shown to be something quite different.

I think you're partly proving your own point by arguing against a perceived general bias in favour of Hülkenberg, which in my opinion doesn't quite exist.

When I first used to work in Westminster in the late «70s, you've got to remember there were very, very few places where people did interviews... 15 years later, with wall - to - wall 24 - hour news and the constant soundbite world, I think that finding a way to subvert the soundbite world is a duty for all of us and it's quite difficult... As somebody who would never argue against more outlets, one of the consequences we have to cope with is that people are trained up earlier and more efficiently and more boringly to avoid being interesting, avoid getting to the point.

And while some would argue the new dash shapes don't flow visually quite as well as before, the free - standing 7.0 - inch LED touch - screen is delightfully concise and easy to use in conjunction with the console - mounted control dial, and all the major hard points — air vents, climate - control — are located pretty much in the same positions, with similar functionality.

We've had the same basic Charger around for quite a while now — yes, engines have changed, as have transmission options, body panels and suspension... everything except the fundamental bones (and Chrysler execs have even argued that point with me).

It's not a point I feel inclined to argue against because it's actually quite right, yet I hold that my own view is correct, too: the Assassin's are a force which may exist within these events and exert a degree of force, but their very nature also means they are never truly a part of these events except in certain circumstances.

The presentation is so minimalist in its appearance to a point that you could argue if it has any to begin with as you are immediately thrust into the game as there are no menus or options and all of the control schemes are located in the separate manual, while the lack of a pause menu is quite strange and unorthodox to say the least, although the presentation is somewhat redeemed by the use of clear and concise diagrams showing how to perform certain actions when new gameplay elements are introduced and some may say that with exception of the pause menu; the lack of menus perhaps helps the pacing of the game.

You might point to the future of digital - only distribution and its lack of ability to pass around a game, and you're not wrong, but I'll argue that future is still quite far away, a lot farther than the next generation of consoles, which is still a couple of years out.

In a hilarious video explaining the fundraising project, Schafer explains that they couldn't pitch an adventure game to publishers because the genre is seen as dead — something that would be quite difficult to argue with publishers because, hey, when was the last time you bought a retail point - and - click adventure game for your Xbox 360?

While I could argue that the SNES featured titles with gameplay that do more than just hold up in our modern era, that they instead still shine quite brightly, my point here is to suggest that the din surrounding the SNES Classic announcement isn't due merely to pure nostalgia.

«I argued back then and I still argue that the reason this can be done, from a theoretical point of view, is that the CO2 in the air is actually surprisingly concentrated, therefore the device you need to collect CO2 is quite small.»

I am not arguing the point about invasive species being misrepresented or not, but thought I would point out one example quite reasonably associated with GW, and that is the severe outbreak of pine beetle in BC due to successive mild winters.

He then continued on for four more sentences, arguing that the «trend is quite close to the significance level» and pointing out that statistical significance is more likely to show up when one examines longer time periods rather than shorter ones.

I pointed out that the world could well have seen these temps / rates before (in fact go back millions of years and it probably did, along with quite a few extinctions), but we're arguing about the warming today.

Of course, there will be many in the environmental community who will argue that the concept of sustainable production of paper on the scale that the world is actually using it is, quite simply, an oxymoron — and they have a point.

The point of this column is not so much to argue each of these points but rather to highlight that claims of endangered professionalism are quite imprecise.

I am bound to say that in this appeal the oral submissions on behalf of the NIHRC only repeated in rather more emphatic terms the points which had already been quite adequately argued by counsel for the appellant.

I think I proved quite well in my earlier post why the 15 yr note is far more powerful in terms of cash flow over the full 30 yrs on the note illustrated; however, regardless of what has been argued to this point regarding cash flow of 15 vs 30, the power of a 30 yr note over a 15 yr note in the first 15 yrs is buying power through leverage.