† Atheists do not really exist, they just pretend that they don't believe in God and
argue with religious people.
- LIE Atheists do not really exist, they just pretend that they don't believe in God and
argue with religious people.
Not exact matches
How do you
argue with people who are so insane that they think your very existence somehow infringes on «their
religious freedom»?
I know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other
religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly
argue about what god truly is, and as long as they come up
with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as
with those who label themselves as athiest...
Like all
religious people, he is forced to
argue with fallacies.
IDK why
ppl constantly try to logically
argue and reason
with a
religious person... as a wise man once said, «If you could reason
with a
religious person, there would be no
religious people.»
Azariah who later became Bishop of Dornakal
argued that the church in accepting the position of a communal political minority
with special protection would become a static community and it would negate its self - understanding as standing for mission and service to the whole national community, that in any case the Indian church is not a single social or cultural community since it consists of
people of diverse background, each of whom would have its own political struggle to wage in cooperation
with the
people of similar background in other religions; and therefore theologically and politically Christians should ask only for
religious freedom for its mission and service to all
people, not as a minority right, but as a human right (ref.
I love reading
religious people arguing with other
religious people.
In
arguing against the possibility of attaining to a neutral standpoint on matters of concern to
religious persons, one begins
with the axiom that all human activity — and so, by extension, all scholarly activity, all
religious activity, and all interaction among serious
religious persons — both implies and evinces a commitment to some particular metaphysic, some view as to the way things are and as to how human activity should proceed in that context.
It weakens, he
argues, only those religions that are minimally differentiated from the secular culture, but it actually facilitates the gathering of critical masses of
people with distinctive
religious views who are motivated to create and maintain strong group ties.
However as a human being I would relate much better
with a
religious person who has an open mind than
with an atheist who only wants to
argue why there right.
In an interview
with Indiewire, the filmmaker was direct about the political implications: «You can get on your soapbox, you can push your political agenda or your
religious agenda, against gay marriage, against racial equality, but you can't
argue about these
people in their home... Equality as a concept isn't something I think we ever achieve, it's something we make progress toward, and hope that we don't slip back and lose any of it.
Depending on whether the theory is aimed at
religious Jews or all Jewish
people, regardless of their religion or lack thereof, the trend for many Jewish immigrant families to gradually turn atheist over the generations could be
argued to not fit in
with the theory either.