Although
she argues against violence, Arendt made qualified exceptions.
Bright consistently
argued against any violence at these meetings and they all passed without serious trouble.
Not exact matches
By contrast, LGBTQ advocates
argue that
violence and bias
against transgender people is a very real problem exacerbated by prejudicial laws.
«In a world of
violence,» he
argues, «the death penalty is understood as a necessary firewall
against the spread of further deadly
violence.»
Btw, since you yourself accused Christians of commiting
violence against you and yours, to the extent that you had to move, then i must call FAIL on your statement, using the same requirements the atheists use in
arguing with believers; either prove it or you lose.
The glorification of
violence as a means to solve conflict is everywhere in our culture and I was that lame person that couldn't stand mixed - martial - arts battles and railed
against video games and movies that depicted war or crime as an adventure, even
arguing we are «a generation of virtual sociopaths.»
Those inclined to
argue that Jesus now would advise us precisely the opposite of what he did in the New Testament — this on the basis that, regarding both tax demands and military activity, our U.S. Caesar is so much worse than his Roman one was — these people should be warned
against reading Martin Hengel's little book Victory Over
Violence.
Laughing — yet again you fail, you sit here and you tell me in one breath that i'm wrong in dealing with absolutes, Yet My whole point in the previous post was to point out that I can't blame science for killing Billions of people because they created the bombs and guns to do so... Just like you can't blame Christianity for people using
violence against others, it's the people not the ideology that caused the
violence, and i believe that... for whatever reason you apparently missed that and tried to make me sound like i honestly blame science for killing billions... so... maybe you need some reading and comprehension classes... i du n no, just would appreciate if you're going to
argue with me, that you actually read my responses.
The
Violence Against Women Bill still does not go far enough with regards to educating young people about behaviour and relationships, the Welsh Liberal Democrats will
argue today.
In a filing with the board, Paul McQuillen, the upstate coordinator of New Yorkers
Against Gun
Violence had
argued that Howard acted inappropriately when he lent official authority to what amounted to a political rally.
Although many countries have made substantial progress towards criminalising
violence against women and promoting gender equality, the Series authors
argue that governments and donors need to commit sufficient financial resources to ensure their verbal commitments translate into real change.
The filmmakers could
argue that by showing
violence against women perpetrated by «the bad guys» they are being critical of mistreating women.
Arguing that teacher preparation must address Mass Incarceration and the systemic
violence against Black and Brown bodies, the author recommends a three phase implementation process for a Restorative Teacher Education, including: 1) Creating a vision; 2) Developing strategic partnerships; and 3) Finding apprenticeship opportunities.
In addition, people who advocate
against children playing violent video games
argue that such games lead to
violence in real life.
Some view this «training tool» as an acceptable way to curb an unwanted action by your dog; others will
argue it's a horrible act of
violence against our canine companions, and was designed only for those who don't want to spend the time with alternate, less invasive means of training.
Members of CAB, as well as representatives from the groups Committee
Against Anti-Asian
Violence and Decolonize This Place, occupied the inside of the gallery and taped a statement about the show to a pole near the building's facade,
arguing that the show perpetuates racist stereotypes about the local community.
The plaintiffs will
argue that BC's legal aid system discriminates
against women and children and violates their rights to life and security of the person by increasing their risk of exposure to
violence and intense stress.
She also
argues, pointing to empirical evidence, that «
violence against transgender people is not taken as seriously as
violence against cisgender people, leading anti-trans assaults and murders to be less investigated, perpetrators to be less frequently apprehended, and accused to face reduced punishment».
As the debate over Farrow's piece expanded on Twitter, sociologist Zeynep Tufekci — an expert in the impact of social - media on conflicts such as the Arab Spring revolutions in Egypt and the more recent demonstrations in Turkey —
argued that even free - speech considerations have to be tempered by the potential for inciting actual
violence against identifiable groups:
If your spouse has committed or threatened to commit acts of
violence against you or your children, refuses to provide reasonable support, or threatens to destroy property or waste marital assets, we can present evidence to the court on your behalf to
argue that relief is appropriate.
They
argue that female
violence against men is intentionally underreported.
Proponents of this view caution
against conceptualizations derived by extrapolating from existing theories of family
violence and
argue that the unique set of power dynamics calls for explanatory theories specifically geared toward the developmental circumstances of adolescence and parent — child dynamics (Paterson et al. 2002; Peek et al. 1985; Routt and Anderson 2011).