I've
argued against authors and publishers investing in embedded audio / video because I think most readers are not interested.
Instead of
arguing against the author's opinion you insult him.
Not exact matches
Bloom is the
author of
Against Empathy: the Case for Rational Compassion, which
argues that we too often let our emotions get in the way of making sound decisions.
«The Slut - Shaming of Nikki Haley»: The left has been quick to condemn sexism
against progressive women, but Bari Weiss
argues that when
author Michael Wolff suggested that UN Ambassador Nikki Haley had an affair with President Trump, they largely ignored it.
Schubert Ogden,
author of The Reality of God and Other Essays and an outstanding process theologian,
argues against subjective immortality, which he defines in the second sense, as people»... continuing to exist as subjects for the infinite future.
While the book gives an interesting summary of various
authors who have
argued that it was the Protestant Reformation that gave rise to atheism, the
author fails to note any connection between the rejection (traceable from nominalism) of reason's capacity to know reality, the Protestant Reformation's appeal to faith
against reason, intellectual scepticism and current postmodernism.
The second chapter includes a substantial discussion of Christology that
argues vigorously for the
author's interpretation of what Christology, including the resurrection, has meant in the past and what it might mean today, with a fair share of polemics
against alternative theological views.
No I simply picked out the two that were used by the
author, who claimed Per was superior in both, to
argue against his «analysis».
Author and Yale law professor Amy Chua, known as the «Tiger Mom» for her intense parenting style, book and controversial prescriptions for American motherhood, warned Wednesday
against reducing rigor and discipline in our education system and
argued that advancing our meritocracy was the key to continued American competitiveness.
The article
argues that Cuomo has put forth policies and speeches that position him well
against Pres. Donald Trump in 2020, but
author David Freedlander also tells WBEN that «There is certainly a vocal segment of the Democratic Party that can't stand the guy,» citing his ambition and a shift toward conservatism shortly after he was elected governor.
Although many countries have made substantial progress towards criminalising violence
against women and promoting gender equality, the Series
authors argue that governments and donors need to commit sufficient financial resources to ensure their verbal commitments translate into real change.
Writing for a broad, nonspecialist audience, the
author argues against «all of the most famous and influential theories» in the philosophy of mind and for his interpretation of topics such as the mind - body problem, consciousness, and free will.
These
authors argue that this pattern of a plateau in IQ despite persisting psychotic symptoms and substantial gray matter loss
argues against a neurodegenerative model of schizophrenia for COS especially since they found improvements on certain subtests of IQ.
In this paper,
authors George B. Richardson, Marisa E. Castellano, James R. Stone III, and Blair K. Sanning bring an evolutionary perspective to bear on adolescent learning and
argue that approaches to education that stress learning in context - for example, career and technical education (CTE)- can help schools work with student biases in attention and motivation, rather than
against them.
Arguing that teacher preparation must address Mass Incarceration and the systemic violence
against Black and Brown bodies, the
author recommends a three phase implementation process for a Restorative Teacher Education, including: 1) Creating a vision; 2) Developing strategic partnerships; and 3) Finding apprenticeship opportunities.
Some
authors would
argue that outlining a story goes
against the organic nature of narrative writing, but others will
argue -LSB-...]
Now, some very successful
authors, like Kristine Kathryn Rusch and Dean Wesley Smith,
argue against going «exclusive» with Kindle.
Again, history... can't
argue about that.The famous
author George Orwell came out publicly and said about the new paperback format, if «publishers had any sense, they would combine
against them and suppress them.»
To begin with, it may help for Alice to read «Risk Less and Prosper: Your Guide to Safer Investing,» by Zvi Bodie and Rachelle Taqqu, in which the
authors argue for accumulating TIPS in one's portfolio, because TIPS provide inflation protection and hedge
against interest rate risk.
, the
author argues against «the often - implicit assumption that lack of information is the principal obstacle to accurate intelligence judgments:»
Senate
author Charles Wyrick (D - Fairland) has denied that the rules proposed by the new board largely mirror the USDA regulations, and on February 21 Wyrick
argued in the Senate Agriculture and Rural Development Committee
against mandates which were no longer in the proposed rules, focusing on details which he acknowledged had been removed.
Arguments in favor of this bill have been inconsistent and senate
author Charles Wyrick (D - Fairland)
argued in the senate agriculture and rural development committee
against rules which he knew had already been removed from the bill.
A study on owner reported trainability indicated that for some breeds neutering improved trainability though the
authors caution
against broad generalization across breeds
arguing more for breed specific assessment [79].
In
arguing that the «activists» are pitted
against the «skeptics,» the
authors are engaging in cheap political word play.
Well I'm sure the
authors were nevertheless
arguing against the likes of Salzer and Kipfmueller.
It should have been enough to point your attention to the
author thinking that he is
arguing against «CO2 stores heat».
Skeptical Environmentalist
author Bjorn Lomborg and former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson,
argued against.
Or Paul Driessen, the
author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death, saying things like: «It's incredibly patronising and colonialistic to tell Africa that you can't develop because we're concerned about global warming» — while
arguing that funding the fight
against global warming «takes money away from spending on malaria».
They're not
against eating meat, but the
authors of the new book Cowed
argue there are sound reasons for eating less beef.
It seems to me this
author should have been less emotionally engaged, maybe he would have understood the text he tries to
argue against.
Instead, the Op - Ed ended with a sweeping statement
against increased international funding towards forestry while the existing funding is insignificant and far from enough to save the natural forests in tropics which the
author should have
argued to save based on her study.
Goldhar commenced a defamation action in Ontario
against the newspaper, its former sports editor and the
author of the article; Haaretz moved to stay the action,
arguing that Ontario courts lack jurisdiction simpliciter or, alternatively, that Israel is a more appropriate forum for the action.
Many commenters asked what they should be using, since the
author argued against most of the common sign - offs.
For these reasons, the
author argues for separate positions and
against the chief compliance officer reporting to (or being) the chief legal officer.
Of course, very few people
argue against the idea that copyright can be a useful tool to encourage
authors to create and publishers to publish.
Authored op - ed pieces
arguing against student union budget cuts and calendar changes, earning recognition from student dean for «persuasive voice backed by evidence.»
• What would be convincing: Bear in mind that these
authors argue against the usefulness of our meta - analysis by suggesting that the sex difference only emerges in one cell of what would be a 16 - cell design — the «young - age - long - term - relationship - third - party - coder - ratings - control - variables - accounted - for» cell.