The other major advantage of using a business lawyer is that your case will be
argued by a legal expert.
Not exact matches
And yet, the very grounds on which these controversies have been fought —
arguing for the «scientific» basis of creationism, making use of the «rational -
legal» procedures supplied
by the modern court system, and drawing on social scientists for «
expert testimony» — all point to the considerable degree to which even religious conservatives have accommodated to the norms of secular rationality.
Philip Allott, a Cambridge senior international public law
expert, has furthermore
argued [8] that a triggering of Article 50
by the government would be an exercise of
legal powers and that «It is of the essence of
legal powers that they have limits.
[NYP] • Some
legal experts are
arguing that federal prosecutors,
by including more detail about Client 9 than others mentioned in the Emperors Club affidavit, were trying to «humiliate» the governor.
Family loyalty angle But
legal and political
experts alike expect the Skelos lawyers to try to turn the family narrative to their advantage, recasting the ugly allegations as a more sympathetic story of parental love for a child who needed help that may resonate, and
arguing that any quid pro quos were imagined
by people who wanted to curry favor with the GOP leader.
Some
experts argue that Duncan overstepped his
legal authority
by attaching conditions, such as the teacher evaluation requirements, to the waivers because they are are only tenuously connected to the law's original intent.
He has
argued that failed banks should not be bailed out, Lehman's collapse was not a disaster, AIG should be declared bankrupt, that naked short selling is not a problem, that backdating isn't so bad, insider trading should be
legal, many corporate CEOs are underpaid, global solutions are worse than local solutions, Warren Buffett is overrated, Michael Milken is a great American, the collapse of the hedge fund was not a scandal, hedge funds are over-regulated, education is overrated
by the educated, bonuses at successful Wall Street's firms are deserved and possibly undersized, management buyouts are boons to the economy, Enron's management was victimized
by an over-zealous prosecution, Sarbanes - Oxley should be repealed, corporate compliance culture is a disaster, shareholder democracy is overrated, hostile takeovers ought to be revived, the market is permanently moving away from public ownership of equity in corporations, private partnerships are on the rise, public ignorance is encouraged and manipulated
by governments and corporations,
experts overrate expertise, regulatory agencies are controlled
by the businesses they supposedly regulate and Wall Street is much more fun than people give it credit for.
Within the past decade, banking and insurance companies have hired historical
legal experts and spent a lot of time litigation over the US Federal Court system's power to issue equitable remedies such as the Mareva injunction and equitable liens to seize assets in federal litigation; the Alien Torts Act which has been used
by international human rights organizations had its breadth restricted
by use of 18th century views of the «law of nations» requiring recourse to historic writers like Hugo Grotius, and even administrative law has come under assault
by dissents of Justice Thomas
arguing that the «Chevron» doctrine of deference to agency interpretations of their own statutes should be set aside as being incompatible with the understanding of the American separation of powers doctrine as it was understood at the time of the country's founding.