Mr Hogg
argued judicial independence was much stronger now than it has been and that the judge would be able to make the right decision independently.
Not exact matches
It's also meant to ensure it doesn't «give the appearance of compromising
judicial impartiality and
independence (including
independence from the political process)» while keeping a judge from taking a position on issues that might ultimately wind up before the courts, he
argues in the memo.
Sometimes the foes of
judicial independence argue that the voters should determine who their judges should be with the rationale that the judges should reflect the community where they serve.
In his
judicial review application, Girouard
argues the process followed so far by the CJC has «generally been in a manner that infringes upon the
independence of federally appointed judges.»
Prof. Grove
argues that the conventions of
judicial independence are «historically contingent»; they could have been different now, and they might be different in the future.