Sentences with phrase «arguement about»

On the consideration of the arguement about where they can play; The comparision to immigrants trying to work in the US, and the US trying to limit immigration to keep chinese (or others) out.

I have yet to hear a convincing arguement about why we should have less MPs, other than the «all MPs are crooks» line

Im pointing out that the Giants took Beckham in the first and you could make a similar arguement about the positional value of WRs.

I have been asking every single Gooner to back up this Arguement about how Ozil is the reason we won the 2 trophies we won..

to all those opposed to the repeal, i would just like you to remember that there was a time when we had this same arguement about allowing females to serve.

There are a myriad of arguements about your supposedly higher ideals where you can not explain why I should think you believe in any unprovable higher ideals and morals, if you can not also have a faith in other unproven concepts, but whatever.

i can understand arguements about that, but i think its a really cool idea and im happy with the decision that they made.

Every day, whether on the tv news programs, the newspapers, or online reports, the main topic is pro and con statements and arguements about what can be done, or needs to be done by usually someone else.

In all the arguements about CO2 levels, to my knowledge nobody has yet mentioned what the optimum or normal level is.

The «plight» of the polar bear is seperate to arguements about climate change.

All the detailed arguements about absorption and re-absorption are largely irrelevant.

Not exact matches

Why do you keep talking about them as if it were a rational arguement against what I said?

You know, Atheists have been trying too push that arguement for long time (not the part about seeing, I'm back to the point.).

More often, it brings about arguements, disagreements, hatred, prejudice, and war.

Even our politicians would rather get elected on arguements over these issues rather than proving themselves to be compassionate human beings concerned about their fellow humans.

What about my arguement is wrong?

That is, the arguement may not be specifically about «legalism» as interpreted traditionally, but a certain practice by a particular group.

We live in a country where just about everything is challenged, and to think that most or many Christians are not having their faith challenged is a strawman arguement, I believe.

This arguement has about as much to do with religion as the Easter bunny and egg hunts has to do with the Passover.

ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???

I notice a lot of the «counter» arguements (about how HFCS is not really as bad as it is said to be) originate from the Corn Refiners Association website... hmm.

Given what little I know about physiology and the Krebs cycle it seems as though this arguement carries enough weight that it must be something you have looked into.

Lorne, the best way to address the misinformation about global warming isn't to make valid arguements to people who have been fooled by the PR propaganda sites — it is to expose those sites» methods, tactics, and special - interest funding.

Planning Engineer: Been thinking about Joshua's arguement regarding ``..

I'm open minded enough to listen to someone else's view about anything, but when it comes to a small minority that feels their point is more important than the majority than it is an arguement I don't mind having, especially when the other side isn't as open minded as they expect everyone else to be.

What is funny about this issue from a personal side, I'm supposed to take the other side arguements as gospel and believe everything that is said.

if you went to a cardiologist and there were no engineers, the cardiologist would tell you of an irregular heartbeat and say sorry there is nothing we can do.really an absurd arguement... keep talking about the money and remember: «The US Government has spent more than $ 79 billion of taxpayers» money since 1989 on policies related to climate change, including science and technology research, blah blah blah and you know where this came from so i leave out the note peace, rich

Much like your arguement above about trends in arctic ice since 2003, how much traction would I get suggesting that surface temperature trends in some region the size of the arctic showed a negative trend?

Its interesting how this group in one arguement complains about how these by owner companies and those embracing the mere posting continue to break the rules and the law, but in another arguement want to get rid of their governing bodies in charge of policing the industry or deregulate.