Even the «Buffet, Graham»
arguement does not hold up.
hhhhhhmmmmmnnnn, forgive me for not agreeing with you sir, but
your arguement does not even get off the ground.
We do nt know when it started or when it will end, so
your arguement does not fully support your kooky thinking.
5) «Again the Watchmaker Arguement has also been disproven multiple times... please see Talkorigins.Org it goes into explicit detail as to how all of
these arguements do not hold water.
Again the Watchmaker Arguement has also been disproven multiple times... please see Talkorigins.Org it goes into explicit detail as to how all of
these arguements do not hold water.
Statistics don't lie, people trying to defend invalid and illogical
arguements do.
With this whole
arguement I do believe there should be a carbon tax like the Ausies are in the process of passing.
I'm open minded enough to listen to someone else's view about anything, but when it comes to a small minority that feels their point is more important than the majority than it is an arguement I don't mind having, especially when the other side isn't as open minded as they expect everyone else to be.
Not exact matches
Why
do you keep talking about them as if it were a rational
arguement against what I said?
But you, when you don't like how I pharase my
arguements and debate with others; when I use what YOU consider meannest and bullying, you then have the right to use words like «Bully, arrogant, sarcastic, antagonistic attitude,» you are just the righteous DEFENDER.
If you don't look at both sides of an
arguement your wrong!
I love how you think their fools for simply trying to
do what they think is right oh and it is right its gods will and why
does this automatically turn into an
arguement over religion?
BTW, the tactic may silence the opposition, not because they can not think of a counter
arguement, but because the absurdity
does not deserve to be dignified by a serious response.
The context of you
arguement would be -LCB- tell me if I am wrong -RCB- that it is within the natural order of things that you don't need the Bible to teach morality.
The extension
arguement to this than is,
do these same - sex parents not influence their child towards «being» gay?
You
do this in EVERY single
arguement but can NEVER provide even an admission that you in all TRUTH
do not know.
well, I sometimes bring some of those ways of thinking and operating to this blog... I
do nt» mean to, it is almost like muscle memory... someone throws out a straw man
arguement or circular logic, or some other logical fallacy, and well... sometimes I jump at it the way I would over at other blogs without maybe taking a moment to re-adjust my attitude.
First, since you said whatever
arguement I make is right, that you'll agree with then: there is no god, jesus is a myth, santa
DOES exist, ect, ect... Sorry, I just had to slip those in there.
I feel so far from God in these
arguements, but it seems the right thing to
do.
If you can't look at the other side of the
arguement, then how
do you know your side is right?
The first four are all
arguements from ignorance and immediately invalid — just because we
do not know the answer to these questions
does not mean they immediately equal GOD.
So trying to bring in what you
did is to change my context of my
arguement, as you so apply stated from Oct. 14th 7:42 pm.
(Wish I had a penny for everytime the foolish
do make selfish
arguements of Profusements in vain attempys to sweep one assunder) Have a wonderful future but if it's not clear, then I say,: LOts Oh Luck, Suckers!)
No, I think it is just a slick
arguement to say that because people don't believe like you [generic]
do, they don't think things out or are not challenged.
From another perspective if satan was his father it is to easy to apportion the blame to him i couldnt help it as my father is satan the truth is every one of us has sinned and fallen short and so we are responsible for our actions just the same as Cain.The devil
did nt make him
do it he influenced his evil thoughts no doubt but the decision to kill his brother was his alone.Its the same
arguement because of my parents because of my upbringing i couldnt help myself we all need to take responsibility for our own actions.If we are honest we choose to sin because we like to sin that is our nature our hearts are deceitfully wicked.Whats the answer repent and submit yourselves to God so that he can give us new hearts that
do nt want to sin but want to please God.brentnz
None wants to be seen as weak and it's foolish to feel that each side
does not have ligitimate
arguement over this subject.
Then ask questions and I will explain them to you And yes you
did, you made him the basis of your
arguement.
You often will lambast some of those you argue with for the «I don't care what you say»
arguement, and I'm surprised you went there.
This
arguement has about as much to
do with religion as the Easter bunny and egg hunts has to
do with the Passover.
------- Hey, I
did not write the Bible, your
arguement is with God and His writers, not with someone who just points out the scriptures.
If so I suggest you don't use those tired old
arguements against it that Geisler uses.
ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the
arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???
@exlonghorn
Do you notice as I do, that when this type of arguement is made the religious commenters are nowhere to be foun
Do you notice as I
do, that when this type of arguement is made the religious commenters are nowhere to be foun
do, that when this type of
arguement is made the religious commenters are nowhere to be found?
And no ignornce here has got nothing to
do with Bible verses, textual criticism n theological
arguements.
All you are
doing is condemning her without offering your own
arguement.
Did you see your own fallacy in your
arguement Deacon Blues?
Harpur's
arguements for the confabulation of Jesus» existance are interesting and worth - noting, but the evidence for his position
does not convince me or many other's, and needs to be weighed and compared against evidence for Jesus» existance, and a decision can be made (provisionally) based on the evidence which we currently have.
Did you really hear the arguement or did you dismiss it out of ha
Did you really hear the
arguement or
did you dismiss it out of ha
did you dismiss it out of hand?
I'm perplexed at the number of Christians attacking these people without a full understanding of their
arguement (how many have actually listened to the logic) and using only a single scripture they obviously
do nt fully understand as the basis of their whole
arguement.
do nt bother bringing up an
arguement w KS, he cant answer fact and only resorts to name calling, we are on to him,
not me mate, your making up you own
arguements, which are flawed by the way.So if Coquelin were to leave where would he go?According to you theory obviously it will be to another Champions league team, so are you saying they won't have legitimate competition in the team?Competition breeds winners, we havent had this at Arsenal in a long time and we still don't have it upfront and in dm, we sort of have it at CB with Gabriel, but until we correct this competition deficit in our squad with at least arguably WC players then we won't win the BIG trophies as usual
I don't know if it was AS one sided as John has recapped, but the Devils were the better team, no
arguement there...
But on what premise
do you assmue Schneidlin would be on the bench?this is a hollow
arguement, with no evidence or proof
i know im not the only one who suspected this whole relationship going public was a work for the shows on E! The constant
arguement made against that was something to the extent of «what
does john gain from that» and thats a fair point when you take physical attraction out of it.
Chelsea have had 8 managers since Abramovich took over and I think there is a good
arguement that though they have won a few trophies they could and should have
done better.
BUT, this article justifies some pretty bad parenting using the
arguement that everyone else is
doing it too.
Where
does the guilt and superiority
arguement come form, save from them feeling attacked, inferior and guilty?
Well, for the sake of
arguement, even if they're right, this doesn't mean ipso facto AGW can't happen, it just means there are other factors that can warm or cool a planet.
My problem is that my brother is insisting that I feed my mother protein he
does n`t have any
arguement against me feeding my mother a plant based diet as long as she gets the proper amount of protein however every time I look online nutrition calculators say she should be eating 45 grams of protein a day which is ridiculous.
So, saying it doesn't, like a fact, when one either A) doesn't know, as the studies haven't been
done or B) doesn't realize that the
arguement becomes null and void the moment that becomes a possibility that someway chlorophyll could benefit sufferers of acne, is present.