Sentences with phrase «arguement if»
That an ad hominem arguement if I ever heard one, alfonse.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
Why do you keep talking about them as if it were a rational arguement against what I said?
If you don't look at both sides of an arguement your wrong!
Secondly, if you are going to base your arguement on it, God only acted that way after hundreds of years of the Isrealites engaging in Baal worship that involved the blood sacrifices and canabalism of their children (and lots of other unmentionable perverted stuff).
Like I said before chad, if you're going to quote someone who is supporting your arguement, they become your words and its on you to defend them and not slink back to the ad populem fallacy of saying smarter people than you have discussed it so it must be true.
Chad, I can now only as.sume that if you can't look at the arguements you're making against me and apply them to yourself then you're either a much bigger idiot than I could have ever thought, the most intellectually dishonest person on the planet or you're a troll.
The context of you arguement would be -LCB- tell me if I am wrong -RCB- that it is within the natural order of things that you don't need the Bible to teach morality.
This arguement is starting to circle itself so have the last word if you'd like.
Evolution is not a fact, it is a theory, whether you believe it or not, if it was a then fact there would be no arguement would there?
if we support our unverifiable claims with more unverifiable claims, then the arguement gets to be quite circular....
If there is a religious debate as arguement / it always ends with the religious groupings / in taking hands / praising the name of Jesus / or whomever having as an religious idol then as one turning their anger upon the poor atheist.
Ah yes the ever popular Xtian arguement that if it isn't observable it can not be proof.
If you can't look at the other side of the arguement, then how do you know your side is right?
i'm not sure if i'm capable of being smart enough to comment here... good arguements, all..
(Wish I had a penny for everytime the foolish do make selfish arguements of Profusements in vain attempys to sweep one assunder) Have a wonderful future but if it's not clear, then I say,: LOts Oh Luck, Suckers!)
From another perspective if satan was his father it is to easy to apportion the blame to him i couldnt help it as my father is satan the truth is every one of us has sinned and fallen short and so we are responsible for our actions just the same as Cain.The devil did nt make him do it he influenced his evil thoughts no doubt but the decision to kill his brother was his alone.Its the same arguement because of my parents because of my upbringing i couldnt help myself we all need to take responsibility for our own actions.If we are honest we choose to sin because we like to sin that is our nature our hearts are deceitfully wicked.Whats the answer repent and submit yourselves to God so that he can give us new hearts that do nt want to sin but want to please God.brentnz
There are a myriad of arguements about your supposedly higher ideals where you can not explain why I should think you believe in any unprovable higher ideals and morals, if you can not also have a faith in other unproven concepts, but whatever.
If our Pastor is using that arguement, he / she is either Lying, or is Uninformed!
If your arguement was valid, than the massacres of men through history prove there is no God, then those massacres belong to mankind alone.
If you use the arguement that if we allow Gay Marriage, the Government will force Churches to perform Gay Marriages is CrazIf you use the arguement that if we allow Gay Marriage, the Government will force Churches to perform Gay Marriages is Crazif we allow Gay Marriage, the Government will force Churches to perform Gay Marriages is Crazy.
If so I suggest you don't use those tired old arguements against it that Geisler uses.
Clear to any Biblical scholar is the truth that if it takes work an arguement to come to one position, but a hundered literate eight year olds can read the book and come to the opposite arguement, then your arguement is contrived, false, and not true to the text.
What??? If this was in anyway true... which it isn't... the only way you would know this is if you were a Muslim... but then by your own arguement, you wouldn't be telling us thiIf this was in anyway true... which it isn't... the only way you would know this is if you were a Muslim... but then by your own arguement, you wouldn't be telling us thiif you were a Muslim... but then by your own arguement, you wouldn't be telling us this.
not me mate, your making up you own arguements, which are flawed by the way.So if Coquelin were to leave where would he go?According to you theory obviously it will be to another Champions league team, so are you saying they won't have legitimate competition in the team?Competition breeds winners, we havent had this at Arsenal in a long time and we still don't have it upfront and in dm, we sort of have it at CB with Gabriel, but until we correct this competition deficit in our squad with at least arguably WC players then we won't win the BIG trophies as usual
I don't know if it was AS one sided as John has recapped, but the Devils were the better team, no arguement there...
no no absolutely not, you should stop thinking that all arsenal fans would be great guys and would love the club very much, every team has bad / very bad fans and nope i have had arguements with him a lot of times and you are wrong you should look up in the dictionary that isnt even close to irony thats simple cynism he ridicules the team and mocks it at every chance he gets... and for my feeling even if he is frustrated and feeling helpless, people who react like that because of frustration and helplessness are just weak - minded and lack conviction
Once again, if the Super Cup and Community Shield are ignored from the arguement, then so should the World Club Cup, and once again the name changes to the quadruple.
with your question come many ifs on both sides of the arguement..
If, as Jeff and the study in question says, it's logical and fair that a married man of any age expect / require monogamy from his partner but not from himself, and justify this, as per the arguement: «most men can have sex without emotional attachment» while «most women develop emotional attachment to their sexual partners.»
Is there an arguement to made that there is a middle ground in this and that if we can find it we may solve the problem of school lunches faster?
Well if this is to be the tone of how Labour will fight the next election they have lost the arguement.
Well, for the sake of arguement, even if they're right, this doesn't mean ipso facto AGW can't happen, it just means there are other factors that can warm or cool a planet.
your show could have been alot better if it was more organized, and your arguements would have been more educated..
If Sony was releasing more quality exclusives that would be a fair arguement.
If these people are going to call for conservation, then they better make it a point to lead by example, otherwise they're easily dismissed as being trivial by someone who doesn't bother to read the full science when they get into the issue, thus creating a case where the people providing the arguement are, through their own actions, weakening it.
My first reaction was to think that you would be more effective if you simply presented clearly data and arguments that prove that the Robinson et al. arguments are riddled with important errors and based on bias rather than scientific arguement, without blatantly ridiculing of the people who wrote the article.
If there is «little hard science behind» skeptical arguements, there is arguably no «hard science» behind claims from the AGW crowd.
i'll see if i can find a link, maybe not anything to do with my arguement, but interesting at the very least.
«It's easy to construct a persuasive arguement, it's much more difficult to figure out the truth...» The truth can be found out right here,... if you are interested, Patrick https://sciblogs.co.nz/griffins-gadgets/2017/07/12/climate-sceptic-end-chris-de-freitas-dies/#comment-261280 Here's also a recent explanatory comment of mine....
That's the big difference, a real sceptic will criticise a paper even if it does appear to support their side of the arguement...........
if you went to a cardiologist and there were no engineers, the cardiologist would tell you of an irregular heartbeat and say sorry there is nothing we can do.really an absurd arguement... keep talking about the money and remember: «The US Government has spent more than $ 79 billion of taxpayers» money since 1989 on policies related to climate change, including science and technology research, blah blah blah and you know where this came from so i leave out the note peace, rich
Not a scientist, but if I follow your arguement correctly: The «missing» heat energy could be converted to kinetic energy, i.e. wind.
Thus, if there is impared visibility or slippery road condtitions an arguement can be made that the truck should not even be on the road.
If, as Jeff and the study in question says, it's logical and fair that a married man of any age expect / require monogamy from his partner but not from himself, and justify this, as per the arguement: «most men can have sex without emotional attachment» while «most women develop emotional attachment to their sexual partners.»
If the Regulated Conduct Defence is argued in court, which seems to be the only arguement, meaning Privacy Legisllation and Provincial Regulations prevent TREB or any board from allowing free access to all mls information to the general public, why have we not seen the Privacy Commissioner as well as RECO stand up and make a stand in our favour?