Sentences with phrase «arguement in»

Make available to the counsel relevant cases law and statutory provision needed for their arguement in court and also prepare antagonizing cases so as to help them prepare for any surprises in court

Your arguement in invalid.

Clearly momoya and Dari were never taught the art of debate... and one of the sure signs of a weak arguement in debate is accusation and vulgarity, Again not my words but Stephen Douglass

I absolutely respect your decision to take the steps that you feel are necessary to protect yourself, but to think that «you're a boy and I'm a girl» is a valid arguement in any context is a little absurd.

Your arguements against the NIPCC report are worse than Al Gore's arguements in his ridicules movie.

Not exact matches

At this point then yes price appreciation is secondary bonus and we have an arguement of how and why Real Estate can be better than Growth Stocks in some scenarios and for some investors.

Am I not suppose to use that in my arguement ---- why?

Stop getting your arguements from answers in genesis..

Secondly, if you are going to base your arguement on it, God only acted that way after hundreds of years of the Isrealites engaging in Baal worship that involved the blood sacrifices and canabalism of their children (and lots of other unmentionable perverted stuff).

You are all fools in your pointless arguements!

But first of all, as an atheist, you have probably said the Bible is just a book of myths and lies and fairytales in the first place, so why are you basing your arguement on it?»

all your arguements are in line with someone brainwashed or the like the woman who suffers from spousel abuse saying «but i love him»....

Fishion... I assume that you believe lesbianism / homosexuality are immoral becuz the Bible says so and, more importantly, what you believe the Bible to be.But can you on other grounds provide a compelling arguement to support the charge of immorality?Nobody really needs the Bible to believe that murder, stealing and lying are wrong, but there are situations that lying and stealing wd be permissable under a moral law, maybe not murder, but at least the taking of another life in war or self - defense, etc..

This is hardly a fair article and in a debate this would be considered a strawman arguement.

For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.

You do this in EVERY single arguement but can NEVER provide even an admission that you in all TRUTH do not know.

In Vic's arguement everything is designed so there is nothing to compare and no way to validate his claim... so it remains nothing more than that...

The huge problem with that type of arguement is that in order for us to determine the difference between «design» and «non-design» we have to compare the two.

If there is a religious debate as arguement / it always ends with the religious groupings / in taking hands / praising the name of Jesus / or whomever having as an religious idol then as one turning their anger upon the poor atheist.

First, since you said whatever arguement I make is right, that you'll agree with then: there is no god, jesus is a myth, santa DOES exist, ect, ect... Sorry, I just had to slip those in there.

I feel so far from God in these arguements, but it seems the right thing to do.

So trying to bring in what you did is to change my context of my arguement, as you so apply stated from Oct. 14th 7:42 pm.

All of your arguement is based upon your faith in the bible.

We live in a country where just about everything is challenged, and to think that most or many Christians are not having their faith challenged is a strawman arguement, I believe.

(Wish I had a penny for everytime the foolish do make selfish arguements of Profusements in vain attempys to sweep one assunder) Have a wonderful future but if it's not clear, then I say,: LOts Oh Luck, Suckers!)

There are a myriad of arguements about your supposedly higher ideals where you can not explain why I should think you believe in any unprovable higher ideals and morals, if you can not also have a faith in other unproven concepts, but whatever.

This is the endless circular arguement that the christian apologists engage in.

The main reason that I keep my mouth shut is because I know that in any debate with a believer... I will win the arguement.

So, FiF, based on your arguement for non-violence --- what is your take on Obama having armed body guards who will kill in an instant to save his life?

And as far question in injecting of homosexuality ---- nay ----- you would deny my arguement there too.

fishon — «And as far question in injecting of homosexuality ---- nay ----- you would deny my arguement there too.»

WASP You rarely make sense and at the same time you expect me to engage in a rational arguement with you.

My short brief answers will make a much greater impact in another person's life than to try and persuade him in arguements..

Did you see your own fallacy in your arguement Deacon Blues?

Your inane arguement that belief in the bible as the holy word of a god is not «religious» is abusrd, ignorant and patronizing.

You choose to pick an arguement with someone who sees the value in religion and this app?

What??? If this was in anyway true... which it isn't... the only way you would know this is if you were a Muslim... but then by your own arguement, you wouldn't be telling us this.

not me mate, your making up you own arguements, which are flawed by the way.So if Coquelin were to leave where would he go?According to you theory obviously it will be to another Champions league team, so are you saying they won't have legitimate competition in the team?Competition breeds winners, we havent had this at Arsenal in a long time and we still don't have it upfront and in dm, we sort of have it at CB with Gabriel, but until we correct this competition deficit in our squad with at least arguably WC players then we won't win the BIG trophies as usual

As for the PSG arguement, while their squad is superb, they have a manager that is not in the top bracket.

Im pointing out that the Giants took Beckham in the first and you could make a similar arguement about the positional value of WRs.

no no absolutely not, you should stop thinking that all arsenal fans would be great guys and would love the club very much, every team has bad / very bad fans and nope i have had arguements with him a lot of times and you are wrong you should look up in the dictionary that isnt even close to irony thats simple cynism he ridicules the team and mocks it at every chance he gets... and for my feeling even if he is frustrated and feeling helpless, people who react like that because of frustration and helplessness are just weak - minded and lack conviction

the anti wenger brigade who are out for blood make valid points, but only in moments but never seem to back things up with fact, their arguements become shallow..

I let it fester and then end up so moody and miserable and always ends in a big arguement.

If, as Jeff and the study in question says, it's logical and fair that a married man of any age expect / require monogamy from his partner but not from himself, and justify this, as per the arguement: «most men can have sex without emotional attachment» while «most women develop emotional attachment to their sexual partners.»

In fact, this arguement is getting old too!

Is there an arguement to made that there is a middle ground in this and that if we can find it we may solve the problem of school lunches faster?

I agree, any Homebirth tragedy in the news should be forwarded to the author so that she may consider that she may have provided an arguement for that woman, husband, and family to choose Homebirth as being safe.

I'm inclined towards the arguement that it is easier to be critical than supportive in blogging, and maybe the roles will be reversed after the next election, but the left needs to define its values and stamp them onto our bit of cyber space http://beardedsocialist.blogspot.com/

In the end I'm very hopeful for this project and look forward to another film that will put a positive in the Ben Affleck arguemenIn the end I'm very hopeful for this project and look forward to another film that will put a positive in the Ben Affleck arguemenin the Ben Affleck arguement.

There are arguements pro, and con, for both sides but, as someone else has already mentioned, we are human beings, and as such, we make mistakes and perform in a less than perfect manner.