The Republican Caucus strongly opposes this request which clearly
argues against the beliefs of 83 percent of the public, as expressed in last year's referendum (see attached chart showing overwhelming support for downsizing).
Not exact matches
Your «default»
beliefs and worldview are not always reasonable; it's healthy to «
argue against yourself» and see how your views hold up.
They kept
arguing against non-Calvinistic
beliefs which I, as a non-Calvinist, did not believe!
Most significantly, Duddington
argues against the charge that permitting an increasing role for religion in the legal and political (i.e., public) spheres would necessitate the imposition of one system of
belief upon another, by re-emphasising the argument that Christianity does not serve to generate a moral code, but rather provides a vehicle through which it may be discovered.
The only thing we
argue against is your right to encode into secular law your religious
beliefs.
I can, however,
argue against what is done with those
beliefs.
But even without religious
beliefs, we'd still not all agree on things like that, so here's a more practical reason to
argue against religion:
According to the atheist
belief they are
arguing against... nothing.
My guess is that it will be a difficult case to
argue against the impact of the contraceptive coverage rule as anything but an «incidental effect» given it targets a market and there's no evidence that the rule is over or under inclusively fashioned as a pretext to target the religious
beliefs of those opposed to contraception.
It is so sad that so many atheists will spend most of their lives fighting and
arguing against the very thing that can save them, only to die and go to hell and then to spend eternity regretting the fact that they wasted all of their time
arguing about it rather than just accepting it, rather than just believing, and a
belief that could have saved them.
This inferiority of the rationalistic level in founding
belief is just as manifest when rationalism
argues for religion as when it
argues against it.
Paul wanted to show that the physical world, and our physical bodies, were not inferior to the spiritual, but were partnered with the spiritual to accomplish God's will in this world (John
argues against similar
beliefs in 1 John).
Also, they
argued against any prayer or Bible - reading in the public schools unless it was according to their
beliefs.
Though no decisive falsification is possible in religion, I have
argued that the cumulative weight of evidence does count for or
against religious
beliefs.
I find it ironic that those who claim to base their
beliefs off of clear logic and data are
arguing against a poll — a form of data.
If they are content in their
beliefs, than why can't you be in yours, and stop trying to
argue against others»
beliefs?
Edward Shils has
argued that the Enlightenment ethos surrounding the French Revolution pitted scientific procedures (and their accompanying rationality)
against traditional knowledge and
beliefs.
But Mandelson's views have been changed in part by the banking crisis; he has
argued that the crisis represented a «warning
against an ideological
belief in markets» efficiency, and a reminder that they can be distorted by perverse incentives».
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman on Monday backed an amicus brief with 20 attorneys general that
argued against a business owner rebuffing a customer because of personal
beliefs.
And THAT is the sad fact of what we are up
against... our
arguing facts is not going to overcome warmista
belief.
Mrs Pendleton brought proceedings in the employment tribunal
arguing that she had been indirectly discriminated
against on the basis of her religion or
belief.
Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy
against a challenge by an employee who
argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious
beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.»
It could be
argued that in this role, defence lawyers are the most ethical lawyers because they uphold the administration of justice even when societal
beliefs are
against them.