Sentences with phrase «argues from so»

Modern mainstream economic theory argues from so - called «universal» principles, to arrive at universally «valid» conclusions.

Not exact matches

You could argue it provides a better ecosystem because it's open and all of us are building on what's already there, so there are definitely some advantages from a pricing and capability perspective.

While in 2013, Buffett argued that «women are a major reason we will do so well» in an essay for Fortune Magazine, he also warned that the great «enemy of change» lives in «the ingrained attitudes of those who simply can't imagine a world different from the one they've lived in.»

But «what we have to do every so often,» she argued, is to «save capitalism from itself.

You may argue I'm no expert, but I've been in the news business for close to two decades, working nationally and abroad, so I've stayed in literally hundreds of hotels... from the Soviet - era «Intouristes» to the Mansion at Turtle Creek in Dallas.

And as NYU journalism professor Jay Rosen has argued, the attempt to be evenly balanced on every issue can lead to a problem he calls the «view from nowhere,» in which there is so much balance it arguably distorts the issue.

So, if you exclude the performance of those businesses, you also have to exclude the cash DuPont received from selling them, Garden argues.

The agency, which argued that the London trading position was so large that it manipulated the market for financial contracts known as derivatives, sought an approximately $ 100 million fine and an acknowledgment of wrongdoing from the bank.

However, it argued that it was solely done so that he could secure his bonus payment from Alphabet.

Arnuk and Saluzzi argue that the evolution of exchanges from not - for - profit «quasi utilities» to for - profit businesses has distorted incentives so that exchanges are now beholden to high - frequency traders, who make up a large share of their business.

Given the flow of unintended consequences arising from the present regime, it is hard to argue with that view: so why are we still waiting?

Many have argued, both within and outside the bank, that instead of targeting the rate of growth of the CPI (i.e., the rate of inflation), the bank should target its level, so that past deviations from the target would be corrected, instead of forgotten.

So you can yell «ITS EXPENSIVE», or you can stop arguing with the stock market and take benefit from the amazing returns!

So aside from the fact that the gold sector has started a new cycle, the fundamental scarce nature of gold and the fact that it will become more difficult to access a steady supply in coming years, argues a compelling case for gold exposure now.

But anyways... I just realized that he was arguing from his understanding of a mean, vengeful God and, all of the sudden, I just didn't care so much what he thought.

Their breakup is described in terms so muted as to be inhuman: «Jealousy did rear itself in their shanty from time to time, and the couple that was uncoupling did argue, but mostly they granted each other more space, a process that had been ongoing for quite a while, and if there was sorrow and alarm in this, there was relief too, and the relief was stronger.»

Think of how much could be achieved if we stopped arguing about, killing over, and hiding from responsibility in so many imaginary friends.

it's comical how religion can take a person with little more than a grade school education — and elevate their mind to the level where they literally believe they can argue subjects for which they are so completely ill - equipped — that virtually everything they posit seems as if it's coming from an 8 year old child.

It's rather clear that most arguing this position do so from a primary motivation founded in a self - serving acquiescence in hopes of avoiding their mortality.

From just these six telling arguments I would argue that Calvinism is overcome»... but to question Calvin is to question only a man... Paul on occasion questioned the leading Apostle Peter so if you think it is out of line to question so august a name as Calvin, then you must not agree with Paul on his direct criticism of Peter either.

So today, if a teacher begins to argue from Scripture that Jesus was either not fully divine or fully human, we'll rehearse the biblical passages and the traditional interpretations of those passages that have stood the test of time.

It has, of course, occasionally been so argued.4 The interpretation of Old Testament prophetism as an essentially ecstatic phenomenon differing not at all in this respect from the ecstatic prophecy characteristic of the ancient Near and Middle East continues to be advocated, especially by those who are persuaded of prevailing ancient Eastern institutional uniformity.5

Please remember that the goal of our interview series is to listen and learn from others, not to argue, so keep the comments civil.

Whitehead nowhere in Process and Reality argues explicitly for such intermediate entities, but it is interesting that he maintains a gradation of enduring objects, from the one extreme of the atomic material body to the opposite extreme of the presiding thread: «But just as the difference between living and non-living occasions is not sharp, but more or less, so the distinction between an enduring object which is an atomic material body and one which is not, is again more or less.»

Piper is essentially arguing that so long as he does not have to acknowledge my humanity, so long as I keep a safe distance so he is unaware of the pitch of my voice and the presence of my breasts, he can, perhaps, learn something about the Bible from me.

: Greg Boyd argues that God withdraws from sin so that evil will be destroyed by evil.

You leap from the fact that we «are arguing that human beings sit in judgement of the scripture and God» so that «God can not sit in judgement of us.

doesn't mean some of us won't experience total healing from some sin here on earth... you don't want to see it so i won't argue w / you about it but MD is a bully... peace.

A few days later I traveled over a different West Bank road, this time from Jerusalem to Latrun, a journey taken to gain perspective on the terrain over which so many previous battles have been fought and where future boundary lines may some day be argued.

Departing from the view of human character as a given «nature,» McCabe argued that character is never so fixed and certain as to be unsusceptible of new and different determinations from the inexhaustible source and depth of free will» (FG 420).

One thing is certain: his interpretation is difficult to argue against, not because it is obviously correct, but because his interpretation is so heavily dependent upon a kind of argument from similitude whose value is difficult to assess.

There are so many more concrete points to argue without resorting to who stole what from whom.

Baker holds that Mays» interpretation is difficult to argue against, not because it is obviously incorrect, but because it is so heavily dependent upon a kind of argument from similitude whose value is difficult to assess..

Just as we may argue that there is a unity of aims, objectives and approach underlying and generating empirical science, however greatly scientific beliefs may change and develop from age to age, so we may argue that there is an analogous unity underlying and generating Christian belief and practice.

The primacy of the spiritual can, many have argued, be retained in the emergentist perspective without incurring the unacceptable dualism of matter and spirit that seems implicit in so many attempts to wall off the human spirit from the domain of nature and the sciences of nature.

So I wish to make it very clear I am going to ask a questions to LEARN not to argue: What does the story of the Isrealites and the manna from heaven mean to you personally, as a «conservative» Christian?

Indeed, in historical perspective the figures for membership and attendance could easily be used to argue that the so - called conservative churches have been growing less spectacularly over the past 20 years than in the period from 1920 to 1965.

With other feminists, I believe that we must consider the likelihood a) that countries with less stringent guidelines for ova donation will proceed more efficiently with research; b) that countries in the one - third world will likely benefit from research using ill - gotten gametes; and c) that advocates for ESCR will argue that, for the sake of justice, the U.S. needs to implement more liberal guidelines for gamete procurement so as to avoid the injustice inherent in situation b).

So, for example, when the declinist argues that the United Slates» share of world exports has dropped from 27 percent to 20 percent, the anti-declinists counter that America's percentage of world GNP is roughly the same as it has been throughout the post-World War II period (approximately 24 percent).

Lader argued that the original intent of the anti-abortion laws which were passed in the 19th century was to protect the health of women from the dangers of quack abortionists, but since legal abortions had become so safe, the continued presence of these laws had the opposite of their intended effect, forcing women into a dangerous back - alley underground.

Tiggy... I wd agree and there are others from Paul... so, it begs the question: Are we really sure that we know what Paul was arguing in his letters about the Law?

When southern Baptists from Alabama and Georgia petitioned to have slaveholders appointed as convention missionaries in 1844, the convention refused to consider them, arguing that doing so would force them to take a side in the debate over slavery.

Spiritual but not religious people are especially prevalent in the younger population in the United States, although a recent study has argued that it is not so much that people have stopped believing in God, but rather have drifted from formal institutions.

Kaiser argues that God created Satan to be good, but Satan rebelled and so God expelled Satan from heaven (p. 116).

It is good this issue is coming out because it is something that needs to be discussed but there's so much yelling and arguing on both sides I'm afraid you would get as much discussion from a group of first graders.

@Chad «I have never seen anyone successfully argue that Hitlers actions were anything other than motivated by german nationalism, however, I do think horrendous theology in Christianity over the centuries has contributed a great deal to anti-semitism, so I do think we as Christians have an ownership of a great deal of the holocaust and I wont shy away from that.

Supporters of a change in the current DOD policy argue that just as blacks and women experienced discrimination in the past, so too are homosexuals discriminated against today by being excluded from military service.

As a behavioral scientist (biologist), I know that there are some that argue that true altruism rarily» if ever, is truly exhibited... there will always be some sort of compensation or benefit from a so called selfless act.

Somewhere along the way, some people got tired of arguing about what God really said, and who really was «hearing from God» or not, and so they decided to organize and categorize all the various forms of divine revelation, and create a hierarchy.

We looking outside world for answer, who can close the eyes and detach themselves from the world and simply merge in the goodness and love in heart and feel the best what we have, never worry or argue the different name of God or argue who is superior or inferior, the people who argues never even know himself or herself and started defying anything which cant be define, We can answer the very question of God and super power, it is not complicated, close the eyes, breath deeply and start detaching yourself from outside world and stop controlling your body, your thoughts, your so called worldly knowledge, ego and just feel the power and light within, you sure will get answer, it wont be Christ, Krishna, Allah, Those names wont matter, You will merge into supreme strength, and peace, we will have answer then, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND ANSWER LOOKING INSIDE OUT, WHEN ANSWER IS WITHIN,