Not exact matches
For 2000 years theologians have
argued over various interpretations and
theologies and yet the misseo Dei remains the same.
What must God think of people who
argue theology over the tortured body of one of God's creatures?
This is faintly reminiscent of Edward J. Carnell's The Case for Orthodox
Theology, which
argued that some parts of Scripture must take priority
over other parts.
@Chad «I have never seen anyone successfully
argue that Hitlers actions were anything other than motivated by german nationalism, however, I do think horrendous
theology in Christianity
over the centuries has contributed a great deal to anti-semitism, so I do think we as Christians have an ownership of a great deal of the holocaust and I wont shy away from that.
We
argue over metaphors because we think that what happened on the cross can be summarized in a sentence or two in a
theology textbook.
His subject, as one might expect, was
theology and the philosophy of science, and he
argued that the biblical concept of the Holy spirit may provide the missing link, so to speak, in the controversy
over whether mind or language has precedence in the creation of human thought.
Furthermore, in the United States, for
over a quarter of a century the writings of Professor Charles Hartshorne, including Beyond Humanism, The Vision of God, Reality as Social Process, The Divine Relativity, The Logic of Perfection, and A Natural
Theology for Our Times, as well as many occasional articles and essays, have eloquently
argued the case for «process - thought».
Critics of natural
theology argue that it always tyrannizes
over the revealed
theologies of those who use it.