Sentences with phrase «arguing about»

LOL, you do nt even know what you are arguing about!

When I was younger and more disputatious (seriously, I've toned it down a lot), I used to spend too much time arguing about the Bible with KJV - only fundamentalists.

Why are atheists spending so much energy arguing about something (God) which according to them doesn't exist.

I wish we all spent more time obeying the Scriptures instead of arguing about them, but sometimes, we argue about them so that we can know what they say, so that we know how to obey.

People have been killed because of beliefs, and if this is what we're arguing about, this is absolutely stupid.

What I'm arguing about is how unpleasantly dogmatic some people become.

Christians arguing stories from their bible vs. scientific facts is like arguing about Santa's sleigh flying... sure it says it flies in the stories but the facts are that there is no Santa (sorry kids), there is no magic sleigh, and there are no magical reindeer to guide his sleigh tonight.

The leaders of Judaism had dozens if not hundreds of definitions about what was» work «on the Sabbath Day and completely missed the point (Jesus said so) and here we are arguing about the definition of «drawing ``.

And if we get to arguing about this, it's going to cause divisions and problems.

What are we arguing about?

Ejiofor agrees that the film isn't about arguing about doctrine; it's about connecting with people who think differently.

They often were discussing and even arguing about «right dogmas».

They have been talking about it for hours, rehearsing the possibilities, arguing about the details, sparring with one another about the theological nuances of an empty tomb.

And then arguing about Santa Claus... haha... I'm sure she believes that Christmas is real also.

I'm not sure what we're arguing about.

I think that your so screwed up because uneducated people are arguing about some thing, you do nt understand nor have the facts to dispute.

What guru did was to argue a topic no one was arguing about.

Steve... when I see you on the bottom, I promise not to ask you how you got there... the how «we got there» will be merely incidental... if not, then we'll find ourselves back on the slope arguing about which way to the Spirit is better.

Back during college, a good number of my evangelical friends were liberals, and we spent countless hours arguing about politics.

This article is about the historical significance of a 400 year old book, NOT an article arguing about the truth of what is inside.

So Freddy and Kut... what are you arguing about?!? Oh, a cross, so I guess we ARE back in the stone age.

I do enjoy the various flavors of religions and xtian denominations arguing about which is the «one true» religion.

You are arguing about snuffing out the light on somebody.

All you are really arguing about is who is going to get the taxpayer's money.

we're not arguing about neural patterns or synapses firing — that's compassion in YOUR worldview («methodological naturalism?»).

If people are arguing about same sex marriage or birth control, they aren't looking at the pedophile coverup.

If most of us spent more time loving others rather than thinking up new forms of theology, we might actually live like Jesus instead of arguing about Him.

Otherwise, they just seem to want to wear dark clothes, act intellectual... and spend a lot of time arguing about someone, they say, doesn't exist.

Remember that we are arguing about the viability of a certain way of conceiving the relationship between a particular actual entity, God, and other actual entities in the world.

There's no point in us arguing about it I think.

Arguing about Jesus is like arguing with an Atheist about God.

but what you are PRESUPPOSING is actually what we are arguing about.

Arguing about it will never accomplish anything.

Nature is beauty, life can be simple, people can care about each other and we can and should work for the betterment of humanity instead of arguing about whose god reigns.

What if they were arguing about who really understood Jesus, including what Jesus was saying about his death?

And my three teen children don't - they are actually pretty appalled that we «adults» waste so much energy arguing about whether gays and lesbians should be able to marry («Kids don't care - and why's that bad??»

Arguing about whether the sky is blue?

Why are you still arguing about it, Uncouth Swain??

This was summer 2015, and while most of the country was arguing about whether or not the rebel flag was too offensive to be flown in the country, Newsome and a friend took matters into their own hands.

I'm not going to waste time arguing about such an idiotic, twisted concept.

It is no use arguing about confusion, because you will only get more confused.

When we can stop arguing about which invisible giant in the sky is «real» and start concentrating on actual practical, tangible, rational problems we can see and feel (and do something about), maybe then the world will stand a chance of survival.

And while the little people are busy arguing about the color of someone's skin the big people are taking over.

But when we understand that the gospel contains both truths, about how to receive eternal life and properly live this life, then we can stop arguing about the role of faith and works in the gospel and see that both have their proper place with proper results.

Politics and theology are rarely worth arguing about, but when something cruel is said about another person or group, I think it's appropriate to offer a gentle correction.

The advantage of doing so is immediately apparent: rather than choosing an opening hymn, and later arguing about whether it was too happy - clappy or too sombre, the choir simply sings what is set for the Mass of the day.

There are people who don't like Charlie Parker's playing, and unless they're uncommonly foolish, they don't spend a lot of time arguing about it.

Arguing about fiction or nonfiction is unrelavent cause you won't change my mind and I won't change your mind.

It's distressing to see so many believers professing how good and healthy it is to question their beliefs when in fact all they are actually doing is arguing about whose alternative to reality is the best.

If two people are arguing about what qualifies as true «fruit» and one has apples in mind and the other has oranges, but they keep using the world «fruit» the argument quickly becomes quite messy.