Which side would you weigh in on (or are
we arguing about angels dancing on the head of a pin)?
Not exact matches
It seems very Anglo - Saxon kind of question to ask if Jesus had a sense of humor - kind of ridiculous like
arguing about how many
angels can stand on the pin of a needle.
People who waste time
arguing about it are like
arguing with those asserting
angels dance on the head of a pin.
Are you reminded of medieval theologians
arguing about how many
angels can dance on the tip of a pin?
The real battle over the reform of American public education will not be depend on whether Beltway players and the outlets that cover and opine
about them (including this publication)
argue about the equivalent of how many
angels dance on the heads of pins.
Fighting one another over which of two antiquated modes of money - making is more worthy / noble / artistic / you - name - it is like the old story of the people in Constantinople
arguing about how many
angels could dance on a pinhead while the city walls were being battered down.
We can now
argue about whether the GH warming has reached «equilibrium» over the past 150 years or whether there is still some GH warming «hidden in the pipeline», but IMO that is like
arguing about how many
angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Arguing about whether the 24 - year period 1988 - 2011 is «statistically significant» sounds to me a lot like the debates on «How many
angels can dance on the head of a pin?»
Because the difference between it and zero is so small that
arguing about it is «
angels on the head of a pin» stuff.
This is a really fun discussion, not only are we
arguing about how many
angels can dance on the head of a pin, but we're debating if more than half, most, a preponderance, a majority, the largest part, a greater part, nearly all, etc. etc. of the
angels are dancing to a «man made warming» beat or «something else» (hip - hop maybe?).
So let's do experiments instead of
arguing about how many
angels can dance on a pin.
There's enough self - important academic nutjobs to fill the table already
arguing about how many
angels can dance on the head of a pin.
It sort of seems to me like a bunch of academics
arguing about how many
angels can fit on the head of a pin.