Unsurprisingly, Kissinger has written an essay, «The Pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction: Risking Judicial Tryanny,» published in the summer 2001 volume of Foreign Affairs,
arguing against the doctrine; he was answered by Kenneth Roth in the Fall volume of the same journal («The Case for Universal Jurisdiction «-RRB-.
Not exact matches
First question should always be, it is not just the rational science these people are
arguing against, it also the numerous other faiths, many of whom have their own
doctrines of how the world started.
Dawkins
argues that while there appear to be plenty of individuals that would place themselves as «1» due to the strictness of religious
doctrine against doubt, most atheists do not consider themselves «7» because atheism arises from a lack of evidence and evidence can always change a thinking person's mind.
• Catholic social
doctrine from Leo XIII to Benedict XVI, Bernard Laurent relentlessly
argues, is one of relentless «intransigence»
against the Enlightenment, modernity, liberalism, and all their pomps and works.
Along the way, Mattes
argues strenuously
against all easy reductions of the
doctrine: It is, he insists, the critical feature of Christian theology, and so it must not be compromised by programs of ecumenism or ethics.
Furthermore, Wesley
argued (
against Reformed
doctrine) that Christians could enjoy entire sanctification in this life: loving God and their neighbors, meekness and lowliness of heart, abstaining from all appearance of evil, and doing all for the glory of God.
As late as the 16th century Martin Luther the «father of the Protestant Reformation» was still
arguing for the books of Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation to be dropped from the New Testament altogether because he perceived them to go
against some of the
doctrines he was promoting.
Statements like the NCCB's well - known 1983 pastoral on peace and the Catholic bishops of France's 1979 declaration do not emphasize the
doctrines of creation and human persons but
argue against abortion by granting priority to the gospel.
Against this he
argues that a beginning of time is self - contradictory.14 Be this last point as it may, the
doctrine need not be so construed.
Granted, the Fairness
Doctrine has to do with the FCC ensuring that public broadcasts show both sides of controversial issues, but it's easy to see the hypocrisy where you
argue against forcing a company to show both sides of an issue and then you
argue for it!
[3] In the «unusual circumstances» presented by the New Hampshire case, the Court used the
doctrine against the State of New Hampshire, which had clearly and unequivocally
argued a different interpretation of the phrase «middle of the [Piscataqua] river» in a separate 1977 consent judgment concerning border rights with Maine.