Arguing against the motion is Charles Benbrook, a research professor at the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources at Washington State University and program leader of Measure to Manage: Farm and Food Diagnostics for Sustainability and Health, and Margaret Mellon, a science policy consultant in the areas of antibiotics, genetic engineering and sustainable agriculture.
Arguing against the motion was Charles Benbrook, a research professor at the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources at Washington State University and program leader of Measure to Manage: Farm and Food Diagnostics for Sustainability and Health, and Margaret Mellon, a science policy consultant in the areas of antibiotics, genetic engineering and sustainable agriculture.
I argued against the motion.
Not exact matches
This year, two competing
motions — one rejecting the bill and the other
arguing it has had enough changes to be acceptable, are competing
against each other.
The government's
motion, which also seeks to prevent mention of Town of Oyster Bay actions related to the corruption allegations
against Venditto,
argues that these topics are «inadmissible hearsay, irrelevant... and would create a substantial risk of jury confusion.»
But federal prosecutors, in a filing responding to the
motion,
argued the use of hypothetical questions was legally proper in examining the «quality and integrity» of Oyster Bay's management, which they said was key to the charges
against Venditto.
Acting Solicitor General Neal Kumar Katyal
argued in the government
motion that the justices should reject a request by the Log Cabin Republicans to reinstate a federal judge's injunction
against the «don't ask, don't tell» policy.
A lively debate on this topic was held the night of February 6th in New York, with a panel of experts
arguing for and
against the
motion: Dating Apps Have Killed Romance.
Rose McGowan's lawyers have filed a
motion to dismiss a drug - possession charge
against her by
arguing that cocaine was planted in her belongings, perhaps by «the Harvey Weinstein machine.»
The OEB Debate has a parliamentary - style format with two main speakers
arguing in favour of the
motion and two
against.
After the debate, 67 agreed with the
motion, while 27 percent were
against, making the team
arguing for the
motion the winner of this debate.
If you look at many of the multi-platform titles for Wii, and how they usually end up being PS2 ports with
motion controls, it's hard to
argue against his claims.
Indeed, in a
motion arguing against the independent expert, Google stated its fear that such an expert «will have a powerful stamp of court approval and objectivity that will lend a disproportionate weight to that expert's opinions and testimony.»
Even if Maryland were a proper forum, there can not be a claim for equitable relief, as opposed to a claim for damages,
against a government official in his individual capacity, the
motion argues.
But as Pam Smith of Legal Press writes here, that's the scenario in Maughan v. Google, where Justice Miriam Vogel
argued that the lower court judge erred in cutting Google's request for attorney fees after prevailing on an anti-SLAPP (strategic litigation
against public participation)
motion.
The self - represented appellant husband
argued that the
motion judge was biased, erred in finding no material change in circumstances, and erred in not making an adverse inference
against the wife for non-disclosure.
But Ottawa Publishing filed a
motion against the request,
arguing that «trial courts in Illinois must take extra steps to protect the anonymity of Internet posters,» according to court records.
Mr. Pierson is running the case for Cohen Milstein and in 2015 took the lead for the direct purchaser plaintiffs in
arguing against the defendants» summary judgment
motions (which were denied by the Court for four of the five defendants).
He also has substantial experience in trial courts, briefing and
arguing dispositive
motions as well as defending
against class certification.
The plaintiff's claim was initially dismissed after her attorney failed to respond to a
motion to dismiss the case or attend the hearing to
argue against it.
Ms. Laiken brought a contempt
motion against Mr. Carey,
arguing by returning the money to his client, he had violated the Mareva injunction which, by its terms, applied to monies held in trust.
They filed, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, a
motion seeking an order dismissing or staying the third party claim initiated
against them,
arguing Ontario courts did not have jurisdiction to hear the proceeding.
June 7, 2006 Santa Monica Farmers» Market Plaintiffs to
Argue against City of Santa Monica's
Motion for Summary Judgment Tomorrow; Judge's Tentative Ruling Today Excuses City of Santa Monica from Lawsuit