Not exact matches
At the same time, Trump and his supporters have
argued that the press has been biased
against his campaign.
They
argued that the only reason women wanted to «mother» and keep house in the community was because they were so bad
at such things
at home - that municipal housekeeping was only a movement
against domestic housekeeping.
I could
argue against that, since in your first race in months you won the recent XFINITY race
at Charlotte, which was your first race in months.
Carvin
argued unsuccessfully
against the ACA
at the Supreme Court level on behalf of the National Federation of Independent Business in 2011, and successfully for George Bush in Bush v. Gore during the 2000 election.
In his job as an activist
at the Center for Popular Democracy, Barkan led a successful effort to get Fed officials thinking more about low - income Americans as they conduct monetary policy, often
arguing against interest rate hikes in the face of high underemployment and weak wage growth.
Arguing against will be Patrice Lee, and director of outreach
at Generation Opportunity, a limited - government activist and policy network for millennials, and Matt Welch, editor - in - chief of the libertarian magazine Reason.
When bonds yield 1.75 % for investment - grade bonds, then it's difficult to turn that into a 5 % -10 % return going forward... If he wants to
argue against that, and talk about Dow 5000 and bear and bull markets, then he's welcome to, but he's pushing
at windmills in my opinion, and he belongs back in his ivory tower.
At one point during the transition, Kushner had
argued internally
against giving Conway a White House role, these two people said.
«Rep. Young suggests guns could've saved Jews during Holocaust,» from Alaska Public Media: «Speaking
at a conference in Juneau last week, Alaska Congressman Don Young [R]
argued against gun control by suggesting Jews might not have died in the Holocaust if they had been armed.
At the same time, others urge caution,
arguing that economic or other sanctions would trigger a counter-sanctions attack
against the U.S. that would damage its economy.
Still, many experts
argue that annuities
at least provide some insurance
against outliving your assets.
President Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen shouldn't receive any special access to evidence
against him that was confiscated in a raid
at the Loews Regency Hotel, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District
argued Friday.
Trump
at the time posted a number of tweets
arguing against intervention.
As a personal rule of thumb I would
argue for the preservation of
at least 30 % of your personal assets as a cushion
against total financial ruin.
Game of thrones: Turner Networks CEO John Martin, speaking
at the anti-trust trial on
AT&T's bid to buy Time Warner,
argued that the companies need the merger to compete
against Google and Facebook for ad dollars.
Depending on what it says, Trump could
argue that it provides evidence of deep bias
against him
at the FBI and use it as a pretext to fire top Justice Department officials he perceives as insufficiently loyal, like Rosenstein.
Romick
argues against owning bonds
at the moment, save for some corporate bonds.
Still, the most compelling reason to
argue against expensive weddings is that while many things needed for a memorable wedding cost money, the most important ones — a kiss
at the altar, a mother's tear as she sees her son make a lifelong commitment — are free.
In court their lawyer Moshkani Farahani, who had previously
argued against the charges faced by each of his clients
at the last court session of this trial on 24 November, said they should be released.
In an editorial provocatively titled «
Against Human Rights,» he argues that the concept of human rights has become an ideology that functions, at least in the West, as «an enemy of the responsible exercise of freedom,» indeed a «patron of negative freedom, pushing against demands and obligations arising from our shared culture.
Against Human Rights,» he
argues that the concept of human rights has become an ideology that functions,
at least in the West, as «an enemy of the responsible exercise of freedom,» indeed a «patron of negative freedom, pushing
against demands and obligations arising from our shared culture.
against demands and obligations arising from our shared culture.»
Again, my concern
at that point was to
argue for profound transformation, not to
argue against continuity.
According to the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), state prosecutors
argued for the death penalty
against Lim in Wednesday's 90 - minute trial
at the nation's supreme court, reportsThe New York Times.
Legal academics have
argued that this sort of harm strikes
at the heart of the common good, and that judges should count it
against the moral and religious liberty claims of those seeking to avoid complicity with others» sins.
This is clear when Cobb
argues against Sherburne that even the visual field would have to be organized by the dominant occasion: «Probably we must be held to see different parts of the visual field successively, perhaps one color
at a time» (PS 3:28).
Whether standing over the piano mercilessly coaxing a budding prodigy or
arguing at the kitchen table over how many green beans are enough, these mothers gave their kids something to live for, strive for, react
against; struggle with and grow away from.
People need to weigh their passionate feelings with careful thought before they chip away
at the inviolability of individual conscience, and those who believe it can be legislated
against should beware of hypocrisy; they are often the same people who
argue that when it comes to abortion, a woman's own mind — her individual conscience and reason — outweighs what used to be called «conventional morality.»
When the Nazi officials on trial
at Nuremberg
argued in their defense that they had merely obeyed the laws of the state, public opinion quickly agreed that there ought to be a law proscribing such crimes
against humanity.
At most he is
arguing against Creationism and more specifically, Young Earth Creationism, which is a pseudo-science supposedly based on Genesis.
Wishful thinking of this sort is difficult to
argue against, but it may be relevant to note briefly that the status of «action
at a distance» is by no means so clear cut in contemporary philosophy of science as they seem to suppose.
He
argued against the evils of slavery with eloquence, but his policy agenda was modest and aimed
at the swing voters of the Midwest.
Timothy Smith's book Revivalism and Social Reform in MidNineteenth Century America, for example,
argues persuasively that nineteenth - century evangelicals with their quest for moral perfection were
at the forefront of the social battle, fighting
against poverty, slum housing, racial intolerance, and inhuman working conditions.68 Smith's book has often been used by evangelicals to support their claim that they have been socially active.
† Christians do not really exist, they just pretend that they believe in God and
argue with non-religious people while not knowing very much
at all regarding Christianity or the meaning of the bible and disregarding half of what the bible says only to strongly vocalize their stance
against the other half of the bible that is
against things that they either do not understand or that do not affect them personally.
And there are those who
argue — paradoxically with the intention of eliminating discrimination — that Christians in public roles should be required
at times to act
against their conscience.
A number of analysts, anticipating the need to soften the blow
against the Democrats, began
arguing in October that the 2010 election was about generalized anger directed
at incumbents because of economic conditions.
Hence, while I believe that Griffin has every right to maintain that free - will theodicies are implausible and to encourage us to agree, I see no reason why I, or any other FWT, needs to admit (
at least on the basis of anything that Griffin has
argued) that FWTs can not defend themselves successfully
against the claim that free - will theism «can not provide a plausible theodicy.»
CNN: My Take: Catholic bishops» election behavior threatens their authority Vincent Miller, Gudorf Chair of Catholic Theology and Culture
at the University of Dayton.,
argues that «By putting voters in a «with us or
against us» bind, some of America's bishops have risked eroding their own authority.»
It would be impossible to imagine cadets
at China's Imperial College being encouraged to
argue against passages in Confucian texts.
At any rate, we at Hopkins hold that official psychiatry has good evidence to argue against this kind of treatment and should begin to close down the practice everywher
At any rate, we
at Hopkins hold that official psychiatry has good evidence to argue against this kind of treatment and should begin to close down the practice everywher
at Hopkins hold that official psychiatry has good evidence to
argue against this kind of treatment and should begin to close down the practice everywhere.
Yet philosophers
at least since Kant have
argued with great force
against just such a notion of pure receptivity and have asserted in a variety of ways that the subject is always an active participant in the process of knowing.
A professor of ethics
at Loyola University, New Orleans,
argues against the moral legitimacy of the death penalty, in agreement with statements of John Paul II that have been incorporated into the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Daly and Cobb (1989), as well as Eckersley,
argue against free trade as it exists in the world today between national economies, because
at present free trade destroys existing national and sub-national communities in the name of a mythical world community.
I am not saying that atheists will simply become theists if we present a Jesus - like God to them, but
at least doing so will give them less ammunition to
argue against Christianity.
He
argued that a Christian facing problems
at work with religious expression needed to consider their position and that they were not discriminated
against if they still had «the choice of leaving their job and finding new employment».
Arguing against the motion is Charles Benbrook, a research professor
at the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources
at Washington State University and program leader of Measure to Manage: Farm and Food Diagnostics for Sustainability and Health, and Margaret Mellon, a science policy consultant in the areas of antibiotics, genetic engineering and sustainable agriculture.
Looking
at the ingredients
against the photos, we can't
argue about how flavourful and tasty these falafels are!
Arguing against the motion was Charles Benbrook, a research professor
at the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources
at Washington State University and program leader of Measure to Manage: Farm and Food Diagnostics for Sustainability and Health, and Margaret Mellon, a science policy consultant in the areas of antibiotics, genetic engineering and sustainable agriculture.
Michael Croft, President of the Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance (AFSA) will
argue at a St James Ethic Centre debate on 4 March 2014 that foreign investment in agricultural land and infrastructure works
against Australia's national and best interests unless the regulatory system and current model are changed.
I don't actually have strong feelings about walk - throughs other than your side is
at least as uninformed as the side you're
arguing against.
K's posts give me the impression that he thinks Wenger is
at fault for all the evils and Wenger should be blamed for everything, he has his blame and that I do not
argue against, I do think he ignores what he wishes to ignore to support his point of view.
I assumed the comment was directed
at the piece, and just felt like, why
argue against a point I never made?