Sentences with phrase «arguing before»

Whatever one thinks about the Court's purported moves to the right on other issues, in the arena of criminal sentencing, federal defendants certainly should be more hopeful arguing before the current Justices than before any other group of appellate judges.

Not having complete materials when arguing before a different judge on whether the defence was required to file an affidavit from the accused in what is known as a section 276 application, where a judge decides if the defence can cross-examine the complainant on prior sexual history.

His civil practice has included numerous cases involving challenges under the Administrative Procedure Act to actions of various federal agencies, including successfully arguing before the Supreme Court in the matter of Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp., v. Shell Oil Co., 444 U.S. 572 (1980).

Could anything be worse for alien tort claimants than arguing before a hostile U.S. Supreme Court on corporate liability, as the plaintiffs in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell did last month?

Yes: arguing before a hostile Supreme Court on extraterritoriality, as those plaintiffs will have to do next term, thanks to a surprise procedural order on March 5.

Represented clients in appellate matters including briefing and arguing before the state's highest court.

Obtained favorable results through writing briefs and orally arguing before the Texas Supreme Court and courts of appeals at the state and federal level as reflected below in the reported cases.

He has represented clients in all phases of IP litigation, including patent jury and bench trials and appeals, pre-trial proceedings, and successfully arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Within the specialized arena of appellate practice, arguing before the State's highest court is an art form unto itself.

He has represented clients in all phases of IP litigation, including patent jury and bench trials and appeals, pre-trial proceedings, and successfully arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...

He has represented clients in all phases of litigation, including pre-trial proceedings, bench and jury trials and appeals, including arguing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Although this will not change your own answers, it does provide you with some advantage in knowing what the defendant is arguing before you must answer questions on your end.

Proud that @ClaOntario will be arguing before the @S...

Fighting for the underdog: Whether in a playoff game or arguing before a judge, a victory is never guaranteed.

Grieve will be arguing before the full court in the Italian prisoners» voting case.

Finally, he had the honor to represent Senator Roland Burris for two years on various matters, including arguing before U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals as to whether a special election should be held to fill the Senate seat vacated by President Barack Obama.

CCR appealed the decision, arguing before a three - judge panel in November 2007, but the Court of Appeals issued a 2 - 1 decision in June 2008 along similar lines

On one unpleasantly memorable occasion, the judge I was arguing before looked almost ready to jump over the bench so he could hit me over the head with his gavel.

Not only that, regardless of whether you're arguing before a jury, you'll gain nothing for your client by dirtying the waters with the judge.

Your role will be to assess the advocacy skills, judgment, and professionalism of the students arguing before you.

The state's district attorneys were meeting this week to try to come up with a plan, and Attorney General Martha Coakley (who was otherwise occupied yesterday, arguing before the Supreme Court) said her office would play a role.

Mr Pringle argued that Article 136 (3) TFEU did not respect either of the conditions in Article 48 (6) TEU (in addition to arguing before the national court that by approving the amendment by legislative act rather than a referendum, Ireland violated the Irish Constitution and the famous Crotty precedent).

Thus begins Jim Lindgren's post to fellow Volokh Conspiracy blogger Randy Barnett on his first day arguing before the United States Supreme Court.

The temptation to exaggerate or oversimplify results would come in advocacy roles, in communicating with the media and public, and in arguing before Congress (and the equivalent in other countries) for funding of specific scientific programs.

«And we expect to be arguing this before the state supreme court by spring.»

I really don't give a flying f*ck if you read my posts or not, but do try and at least muster the energy to read up on the point you're so eloquently arguing before arguing it.

Arguing before a three - judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Beth Brinkmann (pictured), an attorney for the US Department of Justice, said that a lower court's reading of the law, which led to a temporary shutdown of funding for the research last summer, «is fundamentally flawed and should be reversed.»

The embattled judge is arguing before the court that «despite the pendency of these two applications before this Court, [Justice Torkonoo] in outright disrespect of this Court caused a hearing notice to be served on me to appear before her on 3rd December, 2015, for the hearing of the same contempt application which [she] had already dealt with on the 28th and 29th September, 2015 and dismissed.»

Instead of confronting the public school system or arguing before school boards for better teaching methods, we might do best by setting up small schools in which we try out our methods.

As I've argued before, it's not as though Facebook is somehow evil (despite my Faustian bargain metaphor).

If adopted, the measure could make a case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court last month moot that arose after...

As I've argued before, that simply isn't true, at least not as a generalization.

It turns out that Eich contributed $ 1,000 to California's controversial Proposition 8, an anti-same-sex marriage bill that passed with broad voter support in 2008, and which became the basis for one of the gay marriage cases argued before the Supreme Court in 2013.

As I've argued before, self - awareness is also the meta - skill of the 21st century: Among other benefits, self - aware people are happier with their careers and relationships, are better students, perform better at work and run more profitable companies.

Hendon first emerged on the scene last week when she argued before the US Southern District Court of New York on behalf of the president, seeking to have her client win the ability to review the documents seized in the FBI raid on Cohen's home, office, and hotel room and determine what fell under attorney - client privilege.

The government had argued before the Ninth Circuit that the TRO should apply only to lawful permanent residents, because as it stands it «covers aliens who can not assert cognizable liberty interests.»

As I've argued before, there's reason to think that a company like Facebook — public or not — has special obligations due to its role as a piece of communications infrastructure.

As I've argued before, when you are as massive a media entity as Facebook (despite its desire to avoid that label), it is incumbent on you to address your responsibilities directly, and possibly even ask for help, rather than just waving at the algorithm behind the curtain.

So boards of directors do have some public obligations related to how they choose to compensate executives (even if, as I've argued before, outsized compensation isn't automatically unfair).

(And as I've argued before, corporate governance just is about ethics.)

I've argued before that no entrepreneur or manager has the obligation to be a therapist — people can change, but your responsibility is in teaching and developing your best employees, not in coddling your worst.

Leading the legal effort is Tina Tchen, former chief of staff to first lady Michelle Obama and Roberta Kaplan, who successfully argued before the Supreme Court to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act.

As we have argued before (Time to Make the Budget Planning Process More Accountable, Transparent and Prudent — November 2010 www.3dpolicy.ca), we would strongly recommend that you use the Department of Finance's economic forecast rather than average of private sector forecasts, arguing that the Department's economic forecasts provide the most accurate basis for budget forecasting.

I've argued before that claims about Canada's superior performance are not factually correct, especially when we correct for -LSB-...]

NRF has argued before Congress and in court that the practice is a violation of federal antitrust law the same as if retailers were to collude on the price of specific pieces of merchandise.

We have argued before that, based on financial results to the end of March 2015, a surplus was posted in that year.

Lawyers for President Donald Trump and his personal attorney, Michael Cohen, argued before a federal judge in New York on Friday that they believe some of the materials seized from Cohen during an FBI raid this week are protected by attorney - client privilege.

As I have argued before, except under implausible scenarios (at least 2 - 4 % of GDP transferred every year from the state to households) I can not work out arithmetically any meaningful rebalancing process that is consistent with average GDP growth much above 3 - 4 % during President Xi's 2013 - 23 term in office.

We have argued before, and we will continue to argue, that WEDC needs to be shut down.

As I've argued before, what we commonly call «loopholes» are in most cases the result of some decision by government to encourage or discourage a particular behaviour.