Sentences with phrase «arguing over every point»

I have christian friends from other churchs and there women do these things and they do it because that is how they interpret the word.Its optional and not inforced by the church or by there husbands.They do it as an act of worship to the Lord.The point is how you interpret the word that was what i was getting at as we know the word is the inspired word of God to understand it we need the inspiration of the holy spirit otherwise the word is dead and brings no life.In the case of mother etta she was called to preach and God used her as an evengelist in her day her ministry grew she witnessed to thousands she healed the sick and saved the lost you can argue over a point but the proof is there that God uses women just as he uses men in ministry today.

But arguing over that point is silly.

In other instances, the controversy can be attributed to economists being economists — arguing over every point to make sure that this fundamental conclusion is built on solid analytical and empirical ground.

If they continue to argue over this point, it could destroy other agreements they've been able to reach that are also important to him.

Home stagers, realtors, and even home owners argue over this point all the time.

Not exact matches

Prior to the market correction, which has reduced Tesla's 2018 gain to about 3 % ahead of earnings, there was no real major dip, so you could argue that the staggering losses and the capital obliteration — over $ 1 billion per quarter at his point — are, well, somehow rationally priced in.

With more than $ 1.2 billion backing it and Intel at its side, Cloudera claims the most widely adopted Hadoop technology in the world — although Hortonworks (which got $ 50 million from Hewlett - Packard (HPQ) over the summer) and MapR Technologies would probably argue the point.

In court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.»

Ahead of earnings, there's been no real dip, so you could argue that the staggering losses and the capital obliteration — over $ 1 billion per quarter at his point — are, well, somehow rationally priced in.

The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in with a report arguing that global grain markets have changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.

Over at WaPo, wherein I argue that a) when we hit the next recession, many policy makers will point to our higher - than - average debt / GDP ratio as evidence that we have too little fiscal space to engage in offset fiscal stimulus, and b) those policy makers will be wrong.

We have long argued that it is vital for investors to filter out the noise that creates short - term flash points and instead stay focused on the secular themes that are driving valuations over the longer run (such as demographic trends and technological innovation).

My recollection is by this point in the book he'd had to substitute a proxy scaled market, and argue for the applicability of the measures over short time scales, so this suggests to me a major re-jig of my portfolio would be premature.

The banks will argue hey are existing loans simply rolling over so we may not know the answer for a while on this point.

Be that as it may, the point of this talk is to argue against the proposition that a particular type of demand management policy was responsible for growth achieved over a couple of decades.

Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.

what's the point of arguing over God if He doesn't exist?

In the same letter he argues that Catholicism will be the only lasting form of Christianity; this argument also appears in Democracy, as Peter mentions, but without mention of the letter's key point that Protestantism is a half - way house between «reason» and «authority» that can not maintain its contradictory position over the long run, and which thus must lose its adherents to these two poles.

Argue over stupid points and disparage one another.

Can't anyone see the non-sense in arguing over either unproven point?

Here was Alyssa Rosenberg at the Washington Post claiming that the whole point of Wonder Woman is that she's a role model for prepubescent girls, a kind of «Fearless Girl» avant la statue: «[T] he movie... argues that it's... little girls all over the world who stand to gain if they can grow up free of the distorting influence of misogyny,» Rosenberg wrote, with a schoolmarm's didacticism.

no point in fighting or arguing over it.

We can also argue that this points us directly to the Mind of God, but again there is no space to go over that argument here.

The point is that contemporary scholarship, as we shall argue below, has been completely successful in explaining pericope after pericope on the basis of the needs and concerns of the early Church, and that over and over again pericopes which have been hitherto accepted as historical reminiscence have been shown to be something quite different.

Point number six, of course, is stated in about a dozen different ways, with people arguing over what the actual requirement should be (repent and be baptized, confess your sins, say this prayer, etc, etc), but for the sake of this blog post, I don't really care about that.

We may argue over that assertion, but still accept the point that students, teachers, and administrators at religious institutions respect the humanities much more than those at elite colleges and research universities do.

I usually point to these attributes when I'm obsessing over the edit I make on an image because it's easy for me to argue that it's not about the photo, it's about my judgement as a creative.

I do argue we are richer than Liv / Tot the fact we have outperformed them over the course of recent season is why we are not under - achieving that is entirely the point.

We won't argue over the semantics of it though, point remains the same.

Can I just say I'm Irish I go rugby and international games and conor megregor fites we as fans are mental we just fight and argue over everything we're passionate our stadiums are rocking and make no mistake our footballers are poor but they fite for badge just like Northern Ireland, now my point is was at 2 arsenal game last season can't afford go a lot family work etr.

You could point the finger at various issues and incidents for Arsenal over the last eight months and argue that this was the the main factor in our failure to take advantage of the struggles of the likes of Chelsea and Man City and cruise to the Premier League title.

There is little point in arguing that the Arsenal and Germany midfielder Mesut Ozil is currently enjoying his best season since he signed from Real Madrid over two years back, although I would say that he was nothing like the waste of space that some in the football media tried to make out during the first two seasons.

I was hoping that Arsenal would produce a convincing performance in the Premier League yesterday and record a big win over Southampton, As we all know that did not happen and you could argue that the Gunners were lucky to get any win at all, but thanks toa late goal from Danny Welbeck all the points did go to Arsenal.

On the radio call ins a caller called in to point out the contrast between the referees getting aid from technology in the Rugby, before flicking over to see players arguing with the ref in the football, wasting more time etc. then in the rugby.

And while many could argue that Force India's 58 - point lead over Williams has already ensured them of fourth place, Mallya has urged the team not to allow complacency into their game.

Others argue Spain's La Liga where Real Madrid currently have a six - point lead over the rest of the field and where both they and Barcelona have combined to win 19 of the previous 24 titles since 1992 when the Premier League was formed.

It is the one point that dh and I argued over more than anything w / all the decisions you have to make.

At some point, most couples will argue over how to discipline their children.

At some point, my three - year - old son finds a way to make a huge mess dumping toys everywhere and then we argue and bicker and fight over picking them up.

I would argue that some measurements along the lines of defense spending vs. gdp, defense spending vs. deficit,..., presumably over a period of time to iron out inter-period kinks, would be a good starting point.

Both NAFTA and the TPP have been major talking points this presidential cycle, with both major party candidates agreeing changes need to be made while arguing over who is responsible for the current situation.

So the pluralist challenge for Caroline Lucas is whether she is going to strongly back the Yes campaign, which is seen as positive by most - longstanding pro-PR voices across various campaigns or parties, or continue to argue after the next few weeks over the Bill that there is nothing much at stake, so that through to next May her primary point is that it doesn't really matter if its not PR.

(I take your point that failure to achieve this might legitimate peaceful civil disobedience; I wouldn't see that it could legitimate prioritising climate change over democratic means, which has been argued eg by Mayer Hillman).

It is being argued that Sections 12 of the Copyright Act points to the fact that copyright of the author lapses 70 years after the death of the author hence the original owner of the line in the President's inaugural speech died over 70 years ago but we hasten to add that section 12 (1) of the Copyright Act (Act 690) states «the right of the author referred to in section 5 are protected during the life of the author and 70 years after the death of the author UNLESS THE CONTRARY IS STATED IN THE ACT».

But whilst there has been disagreement over whether the tax should stay or go, everyone, including those who argue for the abolition of the 50p rate, points to the implicit political toxicity of doing so.

Addressing the parliamentary press gallery over lunch, Khan claimed that «most British Muslims have come across someone with extremist views at some point» and argued that British Muslims had a «special role» to play in tackling extremism.

A report released Monday by the good - government group Citizens Union argued the current system for redistricting, dominated by the Democratic majority in the Assembly and Republicans who control the Senate, has led to less - competitive elections, reduced voter turnout and, over the past four election cycles, a 96 percent re-election rate for incumbents — who are returned to office by an average margin of victory of 61 percentage points.

«We could argue over which train to add or which bus to restore, but the point is that many improvements will only be possible if the Assembly and the Senate stand strong and protect transit riders from this raid on dedicated funding,» said John Raskin, executive director of the Riders Alliance.

Why spend a decade arguing over the odd percentage point reduction in greenhouse gas emissions?

Arguing over whether the 90s were hot or not is missing the point.