Sentences with phrase «arguing over what»

That was January of 2013... after a LOT of struggling to make the partnership work (arguing over what type of deals we wanted to do, who would do what, etc) we finally zeroed in on wholesaling and threw up some bandit signs.

Unfortunately, it's not unusual for a committee to write a sentence that sounds great, only to spend an hour arguing over what it really means.

Instead of arguing over what a court would do if the case were tried, the question is whether the court will approve the agreement the clients have reached.

If your partner and you are arguing over what time your favorite TV show comes on, one of you is probably wrong.

Despite this, it appears both ATB and the AUPE expended significant time and energy arguing over what the applicable standard of review would be in their case.

Wireless headphones allow rear passengers to enjoy individual things, so there's no arguing over what to watch.

While it's worth arguing over what their metrics should be, the principle of allowing districts to innovate must be respected.

Before long, they will be arguing over what they need to do in order to survive, and why Jack should be in charge of building the huts instead of Ralph.

Instead of arguing over what time they go to bed, you spend more time focusing on what happens in your home and how you can make things better for your kids.

No more arguing over what kind to order, not to mention the added costs charged by most outlets for mixing toppings.

People are always arguing over what world class means or who is... When youve been one of the very best GKs in world for more than a decade make no mistake about it..

Point number six, of course, is stated in about a dozen different ways, with people arguing over what the actual requirement should be (repent and be baptized, confess your sins, say this prayer, etc, etc), but for the sake of this blog post, I don't really care about that.

Aah, another comment page of people arguing over what a fantasy person said... LOVE IT, THANKS!

So, we argue over what is proof and what is not and believe that argument settles the main argument.

While could discuss, debate, and even argue over what the founding fathers might have meant, the Supreme Court, which was established by the Founding Fathers, declared exactly that: Freedom of religion also means freedom from religion!

Let the theologians argue over what is eternal.

Essentially we would get the color of the ball itself, but then people would just argue over what color was displayed.

As she sat sleeping in her car seat in the middle of the living room floor, my husband and I debated and finally argued over what to do with her.

Robert and Wendy argue over what to do with their baby's night crying.

Taking Doctor Who as an example, enthusiasm leads to exploration: fans discover the back catalogue, they take ownership of their passion, they engage in cosplay, argue over what is «cannon», and eventually write their own fan fiction.

«We usually argue over what was influential without any hope of resolving the debates,» says William Thompson, a political scientist at Indiana University in Bloomington.

«As lawmakers argue over what to do about the enormous deficit and looming automatic budget cuts, we have come together to present them with almost $ 700 billion in cuts,» said Ryan Alexander, president of TCS.

The Boys argue over what to watch and the TV set loses!

While Nakia is a bit of a rebel, Okoye is a firm traditionalist and the two women have an especially poignant scene in the film in which they argue over what loyalty really means.

, but a few will fervently defend it, and everyone will argue over what it means.

With Rose & Camellia, we came up with the idea for the game first, and we argued over what story - based reason there would be for the ladies being polite enough to take turns slapping each other instead of going all - out and having a wrestling match.

Fans often argue over what Nintendo products are considered canonical to the very important and not at all frivolous Mario lore.

Not exact matches

But these technologies are incapable of understanding or correctly responding to more complex conversations, like debating what's the best Beatles album or arguing over a cable bill.

The social network may argue that it doesn't tell its publishing partners what they should be creating for that money, but the fact that it is pushing video — and that its algorithm clearly favors certain kinds of video content over other kinds — helps determine what gets promoted.

If you know someone who's devices are always running out of juice, or you argue with them over who gets to charge what and when, this will end that problem forever.

What's more, they argued in a recent research paper, most tips for protecting passwords do nothing to guard against the most common forms of breaches: phishing, keystroke logging, and plain old looking over shoulders.

The company also argues that Qualcomm withheld nearly $ 1 billion in payments when Apple cooperated with South Korean authorities as it investigated the company's unfair trade practices — precisely what the U.S. and Apple are going to court over now.

Now, they are arguing over details like who has the most banks and what percentage of people are using it.

However, a simpler explanation goes back to what we've been arguing about over the last week.

I've been in meetings where people from the same online marketing staffs argue over everything from what to name their links pages to whether or not to kill them off completely.

In a separate trade battle with China, the United States has threatened to impose tariffs on $ 150 billion of Chinese goods in retaliation for what it argues are Beijing's unfair trade practices and its requirement that U.S. companies turn over technology in exchange for access to its market.

Stamos, who joined Facebook from Yahoo in 2015, over the weekend tweeted and then deleted an explanation of what happened with Cambridge Analytica and argued against characterizing it as a «breach.»

The young investors who are looking to enter the market would likely be cheered by investors, who have long argued that millennials should get over what some have described as an aversion to equities — a byproduct of their coming of age and starting their careers during the worst of the financial crisis — and take advantage of a long - term, buy - and - hold strategy that allows them to benefit from compound interest.

So what we are arguing about is how important is it for a bank to step over the arbitrary line of inadequate capital.

Investors, advisors, and regulators have spent years arguing over who should be classified as a fiduciary, but few ask what that fiduciary status means.

Speaking of what he called a $ 400 billion «euroglut» of excess European savings over already - paltry European investment, Saravelos argued that the European export of savings was structural, driven by a (rational) refusal by European investors to invest in a stagnant Europe with rising debt and rising unemployment, and so the euroglut could not be undermined by a rising euro.

The tin - eared first lines of defense over such harrowing claims were to argue that what occurred was not technically a «data breach» and to belatedly suspend the firm's account.

They will allow you to allocate resources effectively, determine what's really working (and what's not), and to assess progress (without arguing over opinions).

In what follows, I'm going to argue that if they can, then as markets develop and adapt over time, those excess returns should fall.

Arguing in a vacuum over what Jesus would do in 2012 using a 2000 - year - old text is an academic waste of time and an outrage to those who are actually sick and dying right now, even if it is not completely irrelevant.

What is... well... is no matter what I believe so why argue over the unproveaWhat is... well... is no matter what I believe so why argue over the unproveawhat I believe so why argue over the unproveable?

When Jesus said in Mark 14:7 «The poor you will always have with you,» He probably was referring to the fact that 2000 years later we'd still be arguing over how, what, when, where, etc. to do with the poor, just as all of the above comments bear out.

what's the point of arguing over God if He doesn't exist?

I think most are actually missing the REAL content of this article... to argue over GENX and GENY... etc.... is obviuosly not what the article is even about!

Now, as many of them argue for forcing others to do what they want, like forcing doctors to refer women to abortionists or even participate in abortions themselves, the traditional goal «has been thrown over in favor of a crusade to establish what might be called... «comprehensive liberalism» as the official pseudo-religion of the state.»