Sentences with phrase «arguing points of religion»

Not exact matches

And considering the impact of religion on society (good or bad) I would argue it is not a moot point for discussion period.

A reasoable point to argue, I suppose — I will add this: If this is NOT what Islam brings to the table, then where are the throngs of Muslims speaking out to explain that this is NOT what their religion actually stands for?

You raise a very good point that escapes most theists and that is while they argue against atheists for not believing in their god, they forget that most of those arguments could be applied to them by somebody of another religion.

When I use the term «civil religion» I am pointing to that revolution in the minds of men that John Adams argued was the real Revolution in America.

If you have arguments against the philosophy of the Church or the dogma of the religion, I can respect the difference and argue the points.

We're in an energy crisis, stupid religions are fighting each other, men are so afraid of women in other countries having any kind of personal freedom, people are starving, the world is becoming over-populated to the point where it simply can not support itself, and you prefer to sit around and argue this stuff instead.

The point isn't that AiG's motivations (to challenge the contemporary understanding of the Constitution's protection of religion) may be flawed (though some would argue that's the case).

The point of my post was not to argue the semantics of his name, just to point out that you're dumb for trying to correct people and act like you are smarter, know more about their religion, and hence you're correct on all your points.

As Steven Weinberg points out here, the argument made against extremists ends up invoking a moral sense to argue that the religious ideas of the extremists are wrong, when the whole point of religion is that it should be the other way around.

They were intrigued and repelled by our religion, and they were angry when the priest's hands pulled free of the nails and some claimed it was impossible to kill a man that way, and they argued that point drunkenly, then tried to nail the priest to the hall's timber walls a second time until, bored with it, one of their warriors slammed a spear into the priest's chest, crushing his ribs and mangling his heart.

We could argue about details, but really there is no point, you and all the other CCL madcaps are convinced beyond doubt... it would be as futile as trying to convince a doorknocking Jehovas Witness that their brand of religion isnt the correct one.