Sentences with phrase «arguing your point with»

That meant making sure he could argue his point with various justifications and interpretations of the text.

Reality, Do not attempt to argue your point with the Bible.

I'm not arguing that point with you.

Good try Budd but an 11 year old could argue a point with greater efficacy.

I'm sure you'll have to argue this point with the more than 7,000 midshipmen and cadets, not to mention the thousands of football fans who attend the game and millions more who watch it on television.

Please at least argue your point with some common sense instead of just reacting to feelings.

Even before his last few games and I've argued this point with you previously.

When I see this again I feel riled and am more inclined to argue a point with someone from your side.

In fact I respect it and the fact that I am allowed to come on and argue my point with other fellow gooners.

I generally find myself arguing the point with you but not this time.

In fact, he used a variation of this routine to train for that 500 pound bench press - along with a 600 pound Squat and 300 pound Behind - Neck Press - all before steroid use entered into bodybuilding (and don't even think about arguing that point with me, I've spent years researching steroid history).

I argue this point with my friends all the time — you can't eliminate all fats from your diet, just the unhealthy ones.

You probably won't be rewarded for arguing your point with your boss.

We've had the same basic Charger around for quite a while now — yes, engines have changed, as have transmission options, body panels and suspension... everything except the fundamental bones (and Chrysler execs have even argued that point with me).

Even if this event is described in many historical books and has historical affirmation as negative or positive, while writing English coursework, you must argue your point with the help of supporting material.

As you still argued the point with me, I suggested you try your luck on this site, not realising you had tried it before.

And the view that the climate has not warmed for over a decade and a half is no longer controversial — only people assembled at the Guardian argue otherwise, albeit they argue the point with (far too much) vehemence.

If any pro-Gardnerian PAS supporter actually wants to argue the point with me, my initial question will be,

Not exact matches

They argue that without proper (and expensive) preparations for the reintroduction of borders, such as customs points and truck parks, the U.K. has no fall - back position if it can't agree a settlement with the EU.

Though some experts argue that employee tenures at the top are decreasing, she points to U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics, which find that managers stay with a firm an average of 6.1 years (up from 5.3 years in 1983), as proof that the jury is still out.

With more than $ 1.2 billion backing it and Intel at its side, Cloudera claims the most widely adopted Hadoop technology in the world — although Hortonworks (which got $ 50 million from Hewlett - Packard (HPQ) over the summer) and MapR Technologies would probably argue the point.

Meanwhile, the two companies have also been the subjects of merger rumors, with Fortune even arguing at one point that DraftKings and FanDuel could join forces to defeat their legal problems and not have to also focus on competing with one another.

In court documents filed with the Northern California District Court on Thursday, Uber argued that the class - action part of the suit should be dropped because the 160,000 drivers, «have little or nothing in common, other than their use of the Uber App in California at some point over the past six years.»

«I would argue that the good companies that trade at expensive multiples are better quality companies and deserve a higher multiple,» she says, pointing to the example of retailer Dollarama Inc. (TSX: DOL), which trades at 28.8 times current - year earnings — seemingly rich even for its sector — with an enterprise value - to - EBITDA ratio of 19.8.

The Blinger plugs in to any electrical outlet at the point of sale and requires no additional integration with the existing POS system — a rejoinder to critics who argue mobile payment infrastructure is too costly and complex to achieve widespread penetration.

It's hard to argue with Quinn's point.

The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in with a report arguing that global grain markets have changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.

Mr. Avenatti argues that because Mr. Trump did not sign it himself, the agreement is invalid — a point Mr. Super, the Georgetown professor, basically agreed with and Mr. Noble said might have merit.

At this rate it would take 25 years for disposable household income to raise by 10 percentage points of GDP, which I would argue is the absolute minimum consistent with real rebalancing.

It's a point that puts him in contrast with PIMCO's Bill Gross, who recently argued that «the age of inflation is upon us.»

There are borderline sexual assault scenarios that are viewed as standard procedure by much of the PUA crowd — this is clearly not the place to argue that but I feel it'd be wrong not to point out my disagreement with that point — but above and beyond all that are incredibly dehumanizing assumptions about both men and women that underly the process.

Often, he'd get people from various denominations who wanted to argue points of theology with him.

During the pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, we non-Catholics arguing moral theology could point to learned and compelling arguments coming out of Rome and say, in effect, «The oldest and largest part of the Body of Christ agrees with us, and it does so with remarkable sophistication.»

There is no point arguing with the narrow minded people.

«it uses multiple handles.If it refuses to answer any of your questions directly there is no point in arguing with deceitful posters such as this one as there is no honesty in its position.»

If you want to argue those points I suggest you go argue with physicists and cosmologists.

You can argue with this all day; I will just point you to famous Western thinkers that believed the Bible.

Lance argues, in fact, that the omega - point of all evolution is neither Hegelian self - consciousness nor Teilhardian cooperation but the perpetual possibility of orgasm, the beast with two backs, the thinking reed who is also walking genital.

I'll argue the same point for the WLC, albeit with less certainty.

My point is that maybe the bible needs reinterpretation for more present times (and is not a perfect work that will hold true always), because how am I going to argue with a woman who wants to abort that tells me that the god in the bible has also killed babies?

One could argue that this had religious advantages from a Christian point of view, since it emphasized what God is doing here and now in and with us rather than locating God's action in the distant past.

The Old Man (nervously): I certainly can not argue with you on those points.

That's like trying to start your car with a house key and when someone points out that you can't do that, arguing that the person that is telling you that is ugly.

You can't argue the point, Piddler, so now you are attempting to pretend that you are just too polite to argue with an «elder».

It is a strange picture that we are given of Jesus during these first days in the temple: arguing freely with Sadducees, scribes, and Pharisees; parrying more or less subtle attempts to lure him into statements that could be used against him; answering sincere questions and approving good answers to his own questions; pronouncing fiery invectives against influential teachers who opposed him; lamenting the failure of Jerusalem to respond to his challenge; and then calmly pointing out to his disciples the tiny but sacrificial offering of a poor widow.

Quite the contrary, its purpose is to argue that the fundamental Thomist vision of finite existence as pointing to its self - sufficient cause is fully compatible with a doctrine of God that can embody the real strengths of the Thomist position without entailing its religiously and logically unsatisfactory conclusions.

A «colossal hypocrite with a chip on his shoulder and a lack of good sense,» no, though others would argue the point.

If you engage with the point I have made about arguing from authority, then I will consider your commendation.

Of course those that have that sin won't admit it, instead argue with anyone that points the obvious out

We have argued this point in detail because with our view of the nature of the synoptic tradition we must necessarily move with great care.