Sentences with phrase «argument about charter»

The most misleading argument about these charter schools is that they will «drain» the public school system of needed dollars.

Perhaps the most important argument about charter schools is whether they work or not.

When you're challenging the denial of workers compensation or income assistance benefits, the last thing you need is a complex set of restrictions about how and when you are allowed to bring forward arguments about your Charter - protected equality rights.

Not exact matches

While they're funded with public money, they generally operate outside of collective bargaining agreements (only about one - tenth of charter schools are unionized) and other constraints that often prevent principals in public schools from innovating for the good of their students (so the argument goes).

Newsflash — Many children don't care about the charter vs traditional school argument.

Please don't trot out the tired platitudes — the charter school boilerplate — about «serving all students» as if this were an actual argument.

In addition to the usual arguments about how such a system diverts funds from needy school districts and / or skims away the best students and their highly - involved parents (an argument that is also applied to charter schools yet, strangely, not to NYC ’s

Hidden behind the debate about turnaround programs, charter schools, standardized testing, evaluation methods and the common core curriculum rages a far more fundamental argument; what do we actually expect our public education to achieve... What is the purpose of public education?

As the 74 Million blog reports, «that argument could be made about any charter, as state funds follow students as they leave school districts.»

The argument should instead be about where and when charter schools can make a positive difference.

This is an argument that needs to be taken seriously — especially by certain leaders of charter schools who seem unconcerned about rising segregation in charters.

She dismisses the argument that charters belong only in high - needs districts, rattling off research findings about the benefits of bilingual education.

The argument I've heard public feedback about and which is part of the ruling, is that because Charter School boards of directors are appointed rather than elected, Charter Schools don't fit the definition of common schools, and are therefore somehow lacking in accountability.

Well, I think Newark needs good schools, period... This idea of «we have to build charters at the expense of public school» is a ridiculous notion... That's an argument that people are having about real estate, about space, about money and finances, when on the ground, the thing that improves education is what happens in the classroom — is teacher development, staff development, and extended days and, you know, curriculum...

The Bellwether and CREDO reports should spark some serious arguments about the future of Ohio's charter program.

And there is no argument to be had about AF charter schools failing to serve a «proportionate amount of special education students» and ELL students.

You're inspired, you're passionate, you've just received your invitation for an in - depth interview and you're ready to sell your experience about why you're going to make an exceptional Fellow, but... BUT you're not really sure why Betsy DeVos was a controversial choice for Secretary of Education, the argument between charter school vs traditional public school vs school vouchers alludes you, and you once thought Common Core was a pilates ab workout.

We've not only been wasting our time and money and resources in a fruitless argument, but we've been gambling with kids» lives in the name of this intellectual debate about the minuscule difference between public charter schools and traditional public schools.

But while I think an argument could be made for such a system (so long as it included the other caveats in my previous comment about educational standards, religious and other bias, and open enrollment), it still wouldn't be charter schools.

Brown v. New York parent plaintiffs continue to fight for their day in court; supporters rally with them in support of fair funding Rochester court heard arguments about why the charter funding case should not be dismissed, as the state continues to try to have it thrown out; parents and supporters rallied before hearing

So, overall, I don't think there is a theoretical argument against charter schools as a whole, but there is one about the conception of them in the charter school movement.

ADVISORY: September 7 - Critical Development in the Brown v. New York Lawsuit Rochester court will hear arguments about why the charter funding case should not be dismissed, as the state continues to try to have it thrown out; parents and supporters to gather for rally before court hearing

However, after the SCC's decision in Christie which you cite, I am not optimistic about the use of Charter arguments to bring about reform to legal services regulation in Canada.

A strategic decision must be made about the characterization of these communications, and if an alternative argument involving the common law «derived confessions rule» or s. 24 (2) Charter exclusion should be expressly made.