How many people on this planet have AIDS because they believed the teachings about condoms; how many unwanted children have been abused because their parent (s) bought
the argument about the evil of contraception.
Wonder explains the heartbreaking honesty in a book like A Grief Observed, wherein Lewis returns to his past
arguments about evil and suffering amid the pain of losing his own wife.
You make
my argument about the evil of your teachings.
Especially if you insist on repeating the same
argument about evils of alternative business structures and legal advice services that will destroy the profession ad nauseam.
Not exact matches
What Hitchens wrote
about the
evils of religion was not so much a scholarly
argument, but more a wave of righteous indignation that levelled everything in its path.
Our lord on Homosexuality In response to an item last month
about the very bad
argument that homosexuality must be OK because Jesus didn't say anything
about it, our friend Gerry McDermott notes that Jesus did give his teaching on the matter, «albeit implicitly, when he condemned porneia (sexual sin) in Mark 7 as
evil.
So your
argument about the Bible being
evil is simply coming from the perspective of the Clay telling the Potter how to mold and shape or an Ant telling a Human what to do.
The problem with such an
argument is that while it offers a very helpful insight into the question of why we suffer and endure hardship, it says nothing
about real
evil.
Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care
about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish
arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more
evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.
Above all, he simply couldn't comprehend what it was
about the moral
argument that had possessed her to become a Christian, especially in a world in which her God allowed such
evil and suffering to exist.
Although Hasker concludes this
argument by pointing out that for it too «it is God who is responsible for the existence of creatures who have the freedom and power to bring
about great
evils,» I had explicitly said that «God is responsible for [the distinctively human forms of
evil on our planet] in the sense of having encouraged the world in the direction that made these
evils possible» (Process 75; cf. God 308 - 09).
The cause of this uneasiness becomes clearer if we question Ignatieff's
argument at several points: the validity of the moral paradigm itself, the assumptions from which he proceeds, the inconsistencies in how he describes the limits to be observed in doing the «lesser
evil,» and his conclusions
about specific elements of the war on terror.
And while I appreciate the pastor's sentiments
about God being found in the kindness and compassion of many people after the shootings, he falls back on Man as an exceptional creation of God as an
argument for why these
evil events happen.
The
argument about why a good god would allow
evil is an
argument that you might look into, but it only deals with a good god, not an indifferent or
evil god.
A variety of activities used to teach the problem of
evil including: taboo cards as a revision activity, a worksheet
about the types of
evil, two information sheets which students read and come up with their own definitions of natural and moral
evil and finally a card sort and template which pupils use to construct the
argument.
What is the only important thing is that the person invading your house does not believe in these things, just as you do not believe in these things, and because of that, you have no
argument about why the invader should not do any
evil he desires.
I hesitate to call this an «
argument» in the video, since it mainly consists of using the words «Enron,» «bubble,» «Wall Street,» and «scam» suggestively, without saying anything at all specific
about why this commodity market — which would be one of any number of commodity markets, most of which work perfectly well, including the carbon market in Europe — would be uniquely
evil.