When it comes to actual practice, we may depart from this standard rather markedly, but there is little
argument about the principle.
Not exact matches
On the reading I propose, the Reformation schism was brought
about instead by contingent human choices in a confused historical context defined less by clear and
principled theological
argument (though that of course was present) than by a peculiar and distinctively sixteenth - century combination of overheated and ever - escalating polemics, cold - blooded Realpolitik, and fervid apocalyptic dreaming.
Indeed, ad hoc engagements in discourse always presuppose this widest possible discourse because any
argument about the validity of social prescriptions is potentially an
argument about the most general moral
principles and thus
about social action generally.
One of the
arguments that the «Christian nationalists» always make is that the country was founded on Christian
principles, when in fact many of the founders held beliefs that were
about as far from any Christian orthodoxy as you could safely be back in those days.
Not only is this disassociation apparent but it seems to leave theology particularly exposed; for while the metaphysician may be criticised for paying insufficient attention to empirical enquiry, and the natural scientist too little to abstract
argument about ultimate
principles, at least both appear to be directed towards describing the structure of things: metaphysical and natural, respectively.
Many of us who have written
about Rawls»
argument have noted that the people behind his famous «veil of ignorance» are a peculiar kind of people (i.e., people very much like John Rawls) and therefore can hardly serve as the normative deliberators producing universal moral
principles.
But the point that is most relevant here is that Rauch's
arguments are
about social consequences and costs, they are not
about the
principles that constitute marriage as such.
Smith says that my
principle of «modal coincidence» (to be possible is to be possible for God, to be actual is to be actual for God) is addressed to the problem of the factual side, but that my ontological
argument must appeal to modal logic as expressive of real possibility and necessity, and that logicians express doubts
about these.
While I agree with your overall point that there is a value of differentiating
arguments of
principle and ultimate values from political strategy and tactics
about how to make change happen, I am somewhat sceptical of the implication that a significant problem has been that modern political philosophy has been too pragmatic or applied.
The
principled arguments he set out then can and are being made now by many people in this party
about the Justice and Security Bill.
In discussion of Denham's
argument, several responses, such as Stuart White's, took the opposite
argument to yours - saying that this was all very well in
principle, but New Labour had quite a lot of focus on «rights and responsibilities» at the bottom, in welfare reform, the New Deal and so on, and had been pretty muted
about applying that
principle higher up.
«I think there is a
principled argument to make
about tax playing a bigger part in the reduction of the deficit because tax makes lives harder for those paying it but cuts on the scale the government are talking
about wrecks lives altogether.
In fact, the more general geometrization conjecture that Perelman's
argument established tells us we can, in
principle, determine a great deal more
about the shape of the universe.
One could make an
argument that since there's a lot we still don't know
about Zika, based on the precautionary
principle the games pose too great a risk to human health.
Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f)
Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the
arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked
about.
Quite apart from
arguments about «responsible solutions» (let's not do that again), an isotope that's radioactive has potential energy — that's what makes it radioactive, after all — so that in
principle transmuting it to a more stable isotope * should release energy, which could be harnessed.
However, the huge amounts of money, time and possible detrimental econmic effects that are being talked
about with schemes such as Cap - n - Trade make your «If» one hell of a gamble to take — it's a classic precautionary
principle argument and that's not necessarily a good way to run anything.
Steve: I agree with bender
about people not bringing up first
principles AGW
arguments.
One could make a reasonable
argument that, on
principle, this was an inappropriate thing for an officer to say
about an elected official: pic.twitter.com / KiQSxCSUBQ
In this case, the Board could participate without compromising the
principles of finality and impartiality (at paras. 60 - 62) and, although Rothstein J. sounded a «note of caution»
about the Board's suggestion that even if it lost on judicial review it would reach the same result in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted in such a way as to present helpful
argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72).
Rather, the point is to illustrate the contestability of these matters which, at root, turn upon a normative
argument about how the three fundamental
principles of the British constitution — the sovereignty of Parliament, the rule of law and the separation of powers — relate to one another.
I believe in journalism, as Bob Friend did, and in honouring his memory by discussing this subject in front of a room full of potentially great journalists, I hope I can support the
principle that journalism is a noble trade, maybe inspire a few to go into it, and above all prosecute an
argument about the nature and future of journalism that I think deserves a hearing.
Principles, Theories, and Models: A persuasive
argument about which mediation practice model is better.
In addition to presenting
arguments about land tenure, the Native Title Report 2005 outlines human rights concerns with the Indigenous Land Tenure
Principles, Principle 4 proposes that in order to facilitate the process of granting individual leases: