Sentences with phrase «argument above points»

Not exact matches

This can be done from many points of view, but I have suggested above that the crucial attack is that which accepts the same data and then shows that the argument does not exclude the presence of contingent elements in God's total nature.

Your perception of me being defensive is innacurate as well, I'm simply pointing out that many are attacking people rather than being respectful, i used the examples above to explain my argument.

But I don't think that undermines the argument I made above, because we're actually making slightly different points.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

Brigitte: I think the above quote from Wikipedia on «Argument from Authority» summarizes the point quite well.

(Again false as just illustrated above and again attacking me personally rather than my argument) None of these have anything to do with the point of discussion in this thread.

As demonstrated above your points of argument were senseless, while you made false claims about what Wenger said.

It boils down to this, if we only buy in one key player per season we are NEVER going to be able to compete with the elite clubs and despite there being a few good points in your argument above its worth noting that only 11 million was spent last summer when it was as clear as the noses on anyones face that we needed a better spine up the middle of the pitch, AW has offered and given Theo a new contract at twice the wages he was on and he is without doubt the highest paid flop in the team.

I think it makes the point validly that climate sensitivity (response to doubling CO2) above 5 deg.C is at least possible, albeit quite unlikely; a conclusion borne out by many other arguments and simulations.

Can you at least point to a specific argument from the crowd that you take to be very strong in promoting the healthfulness of pastured animal foods as being far above non-pastured?

«Expect» is more accurate, so the fact that Chevrolet offers up such a solidly built car with all those features (not to mention the latest and greatest in safety tech) at a price point that is only a couple bills above the national new - car average (about $ 32K) makes for the most compelling argument in the Malibu's favor.

Self - Publishing: Best Idea Ever In a direct response to Eric's post (linked above), Henry Baum points out some inconsistencies in Eric's argument.

Now today, 2018 is critical and the next couple of years as well are far above «truly critical» tipping point of no return — that «battle / argument» has already been lost with the most likely outcome being inaction, denial and ongoing minimisation by those with the only institutional political power to engender change leaving nothing much more and a reliance on a forlorn unrealistic impractical hope» alone.

I think it makes the point validly that climate sensitivity (response to doubling CO2) above 5 deg.C is at least possible, albeit quite unlikely; a conclusion borne out by many other arguments and simulations.

I also stand ready to be disabused of any misconceptions I have about your argument, and to be challenged on any / all of the points of contention listed above.

I can see little point in making vague unquantifiable statements of the above kind, beyond establishing your position on one side or another of the argument.

The only way to prove (b) is to carefully «cherry pick» start and end points of your analysis (usually different ones in different datasets, depending on how badly your argument fares), as outlined in David Middleton's article above.

If you look at the above discussion then you will see that I argued your point repeatedly until the arguments of Mike Jonas forced me to concede that I was wrong.

But the argument above has no merit - all the points in this post, even in the previous paragraph, which is well - established knowledge about climate change, demonstrate the paucity of the «hypothesis».

If you had any intellectual honesty you could, for example, provide constructive arguments to refute the thoughtful points made by SecularAnamist (3 Mar 2014 @ 12:08 PM, ~ # 5 above).

This is the second one of the three points I listed further above on which the appeals court might disagree with Google, in which case there wouldn't be much left of its anti-copyrightability argument.

Finally, the judgment mentions two «problem cases» that had been in issue in the arguments: (i) the «teacher» problem (above)-- here it was pointed out that the court's decision resolved this issue because it meant that the employers could continue to require holidays to be taken out of term time, even though that is not «working time»;

When you combine the three points above, you establish a solid argument for why you deserve to a position over the competition.

To the extent that this argument is an extension of the previous point that the right to negotiate only benefits those in a native title claim, this is dealt with in 3.5.1 above.

The above points highlight Sauber and Worenkliens» (2013) argument that due to a lack of professional awareness of the complex dynamics of family separations, there is a risk that some professionals unknowingly collude with the parent who is engaged in the alienation process.